Some Republicans Think the NRA Has Jumped the Shark
Source: Roll Call
The immediate reaction from Republican staffers on Capitol Hill suggests the National Rifle Association might have jumped the shark Friday.
After Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the NRA, blamed mass school shootings on gun-free school zones, suggested there should be a national mental health registry, blamed the medias coverage of violence, pointed fingers at video games and old films and introduced the National School Shield Program, wherein the NRA would train armed school personnel and volunteers, it was just too much for some Republicans.
100 percent true, one GOP staffer said when asked if the NRA had jumped the shark Friday.
True, replied another. But only after they set themselves on fire first. That was BRUTAL.
Read more: http://hoh.rollcall.com/some-republicans-think-the-nra-has-jumped-the-shark/
NICO9000
(970 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)LongTomH
(8,636 posts)BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Long overdo. Lawrence O'Donnell said LaPierre avoided the draft. I suppose he got deferments. Typical for chicken hawks.
EmeraldCityGrl
(4,310 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)"mental health registry". What an arrogant dick.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)A nervous condition that keeps your from serving in the military qualifies as mental illness.
Considering he wants a database of psychiatric patients, he should be on it too.
What a hypocrite.
hatrack
(59,583 posts)And only if that stack is constantly growing.
Kind of like the Winchester House out in California (pun intended).
Skittles
(153,138 posts)YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF *EVERYTHING*
jillan
(39,451 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)At least they are consistent in their anti-American FAIL
calimary
(81,189 posts)Totally, completely, absolutely, and undeniably! Beyond any doubt.
jimlup
(7,968 posts)Might only be underlings. Their bosses will follow the NRA while genuflecting.
OneMoreDemocrat
(913 posts)and I gotta say, it wasn't just the craziness LaPierre was actually saying, but the way he was saying it.
I think an awful lot of Americans, even folks who were NRA supporters feel that he was really over the top; angry, judgmental, defensive.
Those same supporters are the ones that have to do the voting to keep the Congress in office and this performance may very well be difficult to shine up come election time...I'm not sure that proudly boasting of being an NRA supporter will be a great move.
In fact I wouldn't be surprised if LaPierre was looking for a new job soon.
Cha
(297,052 posts)America insinuate NRA had anything to do with death by guns, guns, guns, and more guns.. all kinds of guns.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)That one dies on their knees.
oldhippydude
(2,514 posts)can't we do something about the flow of guns into Mexico..... not only is it a national disgrace, Darrel Issa has used the fast and furious for over a year as whipping boy...
George II
(67,782 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)Squinch
(50,935 posts)Cha
(297,052 posts)innocent victims of killer, Adam Lanza, and America, with a big FU.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The Republicans are schizophrenic and will change their mind once some of these groups start threatening to jerk their purse strings for their campaigns.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)One GOP 'staffer'. Then another staffer! The 'staffers' do not so much as name their office or title much less give their names or the names of the Republicans they serve who have said nothing against the NRA.
No, the Republicans and other right leaning people are still silent and still supporting the NRA and guns for all. Claiming otherwise using unnamed underlings seems to shine rosy light on the Republicans which is fully undeserved.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)It is a way to gauge which way the political winds and public opinion on a touchy matter are blowing without having to commit one way or another.
Right now, the NRA is political poison, and LaPierre wannts the GOP to line up and drink a shit-ton more of it.
Anyone running on a strict NRA approved platform from here on out will now have to do so with also having to apologize for mass murderers in order to justify themselves.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)My point, and I don't much care if you don't like it, is that as a Democrat, I do not count unnamed staff at unnamed offices as 'Republicans against the NRA' . I think the headline serves the right, Republicans and their Third Way allies.
No matter how you slice it, all the 'name' Republicans still support and take money from the NRA. As a Democrat, I'd like to shout that fact from the roof tops, not attempt to craft a false 'balance' with 'both sides doing it' and all. It is bull puckey.
So sure. Some Republican somewhere probably does think that. But to imply it is elected Republicans in DC only serves them. Not one of them has said NRA 'jumped the shark' or any other critical statement. Not one of them.
julian09
(1,435 posts)The NRA has 4 million members against at least 160 million voters; you would think that the 160 million voters, carry more weight and
fear if they organized themselves against the NRA extreem candidates, not NRA members. Overwhelming numbers of their members favor reasonable laws. The NRA is for the gun industry not its' members.
It is time for the majority to push the mere 4 million NRA threath aside and give them the fear of 160 million voters instead.
Same goes for the tax cut on rich and Grover Norquist threath to primary.
rucky
(35,211 posts)after his resignation
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Repukes, like all politicians, don't need to give a shit what their interest groups think for at least another year.
samsingh
(17,594 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Or do they stand to make some big bucks off this proposal? Wow educational dollars going directly into the coffers of the NRA. A wet dream cum true!
Cherchez la Femme
(2,488 posts)To quote a good friend of mine, and of good children whose parents happen to have expendable money this year:
"Hohohohohoho!"
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)connection between NRA and military armaments industry? Why send NRA to U.N. to argue against international gun running regulations.
Steele1762
(31 posts)The NRA is being ridiculous
spicegal
(758 posts)undeterred
(34,658 posts)Resonance_Chamber
(142 posts)the preferred mouth piece for the nutters now....
Gun Owners of America (GOA) is a non-profit lobbying organization formed in 1975 to preserve and defend the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. GOA sees firearms ownership as a freedom issue.
GOA was founded in 1975 by Sen. H.L. (Bill) Richardson (now retired). Richardson continues to serve as the Chairman of Gun Owners of America, bringing his many years of political experience to the leadership of GOA. Richardson is also an avid hunter and outdoorsman.
The GOA Board of Directors brings over 100 years of combined knowledge and experience on guns, legislation and politics. GOA's Board is not satisfied with the "status quo." Americans have lost some of our precious gun rights and WE WANT THEM BACK! This is why GOA is considered the "no compromise" gun lobby.
From state legislatures and city councils to the United States Congress and the White House, GOA represents the views of gun owners whenever their rights are threatened.
GOA has never wavered from its mission to defend the Second Amendment -- liberty's freedom teeth, as George Washington called it.
Over the last 30 years, GOA has built a nationwide network of attorneys to help fight court battles in almost every state in the nation to protect gun owner rights. GOA staff and attorneys have also worked with members of Congress, state legislators and local citizens to protect gun ranges and local gun clubs from closure by overzealous government anti-gun bureaucrats.
http://gunowners.org/protect.htm
http://gunowners.org/
jqanderson1
(2 posts)The GOP should know because they have jumped the shark too. They are now irrelevant.
patrice
(47,992 posts)between inductive and deductive reasoning, that is, if any of them care about the truth at all, instead of making psychosis the goal of ALL Republican efforts, their highest priority over ANY other issue, including national defense.
Crackinrocket
(25 posts)I don't think that word means what you think it means.
patrice
(47,992 posts)describe the NRA (amongst others, e.g. the Tea Party), especially in as much as their means of power acquisition is the ultimate violence possible, or at least the threat thereof?
What do you think the purpose of fascism is?
Crackinrocket
(25 posts)What does an organization that lobbies for the gun industry and gun owners have to do with the unique brand of authoritarianism that fascism implies? Just wanting power doesn't necessarily equate to being a fascist. Almost every politician seeks to acquire power through violence ( supporting military industrial complex, war, police state etc). Are the majority of our politicians fascist?
patrice
(47,992 posts)a single objective, e.g. the propagation of as many guns of every kind as possible to as many people as possible, with no other criteria than more, always more, unceasingly more and, in the case of guns, more = more power over others, whether that power is latent or manifest, more guns = more of it.
patrice
(47,992 posts)by means of the power it takes to suppress/oppress differences?
The turbulence of the time created in people the hunger for the one of things that fascism offers foremost, unity.
- snip -
Fascism became popular because it could do what liberalism and socialism could not. People have the need to belong something greater than themselves. In weakness, the craving for unity and purpose in turn causes them to seek strength and guidance. Fascism provided that.
http://www.enscriptchun.net/words/sa/ps4.html
The opposite of weakness is the power that makes strength possible.
Guns are an ultimate form of power and, hence, the strength to make others do what you want them to do.
patrice
(47,992 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)perspectives is a drive toward power, by any means possible, under any guise/any label available, for power's sake alone.
BanTheGOP
(1,068 posts)There is NO WAY that the organization should be allowed to financially exist. Every donor of this organization should be outed just like the gun owners in Westchester Country, their employers and neighbors notified, and the school officials notified so they can put out notices to city child services. No child should have to live in a household with a weapon other than law enforcement, and no child should ever touch a gun until he or she is an adult in an approved government training course.
Above all, the NRA needs to be DEMONIZED for the racist, republicanist organization that it entails. Period.
AldoLeopold
(617 posts)[link:|