CBS agrees to hand over '60 Minutes' Harris interview transcripts to FCC
Source: AP
By DAVID BAUDER
Updated 6:15 PM CST, January 31, 2025
CBS says it will turn over an unedited transcript of its October interview with Kamala Harris to the Federal Communications Commission, part of President Donald Trumps ongoing fight with the network over how it handled a story about his opponent.
Trump sued CBS for $10 million over the 60 Minutes interview, claiming it was deceptively edited to make Harris look good. Published reports said that CBS parent company, Paramount, has been talking to Trumps lawyers about a settlement.
The network said Friday that it was compelled by Brendan Carr, Trumps appointee as FCC chairman, to turn over the transcripts and camera feeds of the interview for a parallel investigation by the commission. 60 Minutes has resisted releasing transcripts for this and all of its interviews, to avoid second-guessing of its editing process.
The case, particularly a potential settlement, is being closely watched by advocates for press freedom and by journalists within CBS, whose lawyers called Trumps lawsuit completely without merit and promised to vigorously fight it after it was filed.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-cbs-60-minutes-harris-interview-ac36372dd700c9d233eee78773473f49

madaboutharry
(41,836 posts)TimeToGo
(1,415 posts)madaboutharry
(41,836 posts)Bengus81
(8,689 posts)WTF...he could suspend ANYONE from that website posting SHIT about Covid that Trump was doing.
It's his and shareholders website not Trumps. There's no fucking freedom of speech bullshit on FB or on DU for that matter.
DENVERPOPS
(11,745 posts)95+% of ALL Media in the U.S. is owned/operated by Uber Rich Republicans.........Seriously !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just look at the L.A. Times, the Washington Post, as prime examples of Uber Rich, Republican Owners kissing the ring recently.
TimeToGo
(1,415 posts)I meant by the law
DENVERPOPS
(11,745 posts)They have taken "LAW" back to the days of the old west, and with complete support of the USSC which is, at this point,
is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican Corporation...........(You really can't call them a PARTY anymore)
Hitorque
(254 posts)no_hypocrisy
(51,150 posts)cadoman
(1,201 posts)When the quote in full is even more erudite.
Think. Again.
(22,330 posts)I could see it if Harris were to sue for some reason, but what gives trump any mor standing then everyone else?
Callie1979
(652 posts)DENVERPOPS
(11,745 posts)put in charge of the FBI reviewing the records of any and all agents that had ANYTHING to do with prosecuting Trump ! All 2000 of them, for future "discipline" by Trump's appointed head of the DOJ and backed up by the USSC who are a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican Party...........
His actions in the past 24-48 hours is proof he is directing a Coup de Gras to fulfill Putin's wishes to Obliterate the U.S. Economy, Democracy, Constitution and citizens........LOL including all his Trump Humping Voters who were all so stupid they didn't realize what he meant, when he said at all his last months pre-election rally's:......"Vote for me, this one last time, and you will never need to vote again"...........
Of course, he will tell his Trumphumping CULT: "The South Shall Rise Again" or something similar racist statement, and they will all continue to follow him...(into their graves)
kkmarie
(123 posts)He won. He has no damages. Edited or not it did not help VP Harris.
johnnyfins
(1,964 posts)Forget all of this fascism is on the rise and moving toward a dictatorship. It's already here. When do the liberals start getting thrown into ghettos? Because liberals are their ultimate target.
creeksneakers2
(7,639 posts)Mike Nelson
(10,539 posts)... if this is true, that the segment was "deceptively edited to make Harris look good," the entire FOX "News" network should be eliminated for deceptive editing to make a Presidential candidate appear good.
dem4decades
(12,627 posts)works too.
Initech
(104,495 posts)And you MAGA choads who are lurking hoping to get your jollies from us crying, go fuck yourselves. And no, Trump Derangement Syndrome isn't a thing no matter how badly you, him, and your stupid fucking news network want it to be. Fuck you.
Lonestarblue
(12,549 posts)We all know that the Trump team will edit the tapes to make Harriss answers seem scrambled and then say it was CBS that had to make her look good. Harris should sue CBS for the unedited tape as well to use against any edited tape being used by Republicans. Remember the Republican playbook that any Democrat who has a potential future as president has to be destroyed, as they did with Clinton. And Trump will want to destroy her because she is a woman and black.
Bengus81
(8,689 posts)Trump town hall last year. The one where they tweaked the lighting over three days to make that spray tan POS look his best. All the while the fake audience was being assembled of nothing but Trump supporters. They were told too NO MAGA hats or shirts etc. Gotta make it look real enough to fool people.
Go the FUCK after CNN.....
SADAR
(45 posts)and then use AI to change it.
FakeNoose
(37,139 posts)No, this is just a standard mob boss move, so Chump and his lawyers can intimidate ALL the networks.
SADAR
(45 posts)kerouac2
(1,153 posts)Of both huge and ridiculously petty things to do. And they seem to have enough minions to check them all off the list.
Botany
(73,837 posts)
Bok_Tukalo
(4,446 posts)Sue and settle.
Public servants facilitating bribery and extortion.
Rincewind
(1,302 posts)trump did not sue for $10million, he sued for $10BILLION.
Wild blueberry
(7,572 posts)Mr. Mustard 2023
(314 posts)if an interview (of them) was done "properly"? I guess I shouldn't be shocked because for nearly 35 years I've resisted white boy, punk ass racist, mediocre or incompetent - so called "Christians" my entire life telling anyone who would listen how weak & entitled they are.
Therefore, to see punk ass white boys bow down like cuckolds to someone shouldn't surprise me at all, because I long ago realized all their posturing, flexing and braying was for show.
American white boy Republican so called "Christians" are cuckolds and kneeling to their leader, like cuckolds do.
I-teach-kids
(9 posts)Nothing you see on TV. The movies. The songs you listen to is ever edited, right?
Perhaps Kamala should sue also as it was HER response that was allegedly edited!
Id much rather hear her positive message than anything out of the orange menace.
Kid Berwyn
(19,961 posts)Fascists dont like a free press.
Actually, the Harris campaign should have demanded it be unedited in the first place.
By not doing so, it make the appearance of something hiding in the edit.
Kid Berwyn
(19,961 posts)Edited or unedited, it is CBS property. It is standard practice to edit an interview for clarity, length, etc.
Now the NAZI Trumpf demands compensation because an interview with a public figure hurt his fragile feelings.
There is no basis for him to do this, other than to intimidate the press.
FUCK TRUMP.
Dog Walkers Rock
(2 posts)Kamala Harris does not need editing to look good. What CBS should have done was turn around and air the whole unedited interview. Heavily promoted it in advance being sure to get it out there that Trump was suing them and now the FCC was compelling them to turn it over. Then after the interview was over, have a panel of Constitutional scholars discuss freedom of the press and the implications of what the Trump administration is doing.
samsingh
(18,036 posts)imaginary girl
(960 posts)Why care about any of this? His pursuing it implies he has reason to believe it impacted the vote.
emulatorloo
(45,759 posts)Plus a lot of this nonsense is just rotten red meat for his delusional fans - all media is evil and out to get me.
When in reality, our media sanewashed Trump.
Bengus81
(8,689 posts)couple of months with these phony lawsuits without even having to go to court. Look what Zuckerberg paid him a couple of days ago.
https://www.npr.org/2025/01/29/nx-s1-5279570/meta-trump-settlement-facebook-instagram-suspensions
emulatorloo
(45,759 posts)Dave Bowman
(4,983 posts)The best editing in the world couldn't make him look and sound good. A polished turd is still a turd.
mcar
(44,450 posts)marshall
(6,689 posts)Seeing the unedited footage will finally put the matter to rest.
creeksneakers2
(7,639 posts)Kamala gave good answers to the same question. Not even completely different and nothing negative was hidden.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/10/11/60-minutes-edited-harris-answer/
underpants
(189,952 posts)In our research, we found that CBS News did broadcast two different versions of Harris' answers to a series of questions she was asked about Netanyahu. One version aired on Oct. 6 on the Sunday-morning CBS News program "Face the Nation," and the other on "60 Minutes" the following day, during the show's primetime election special. As of this writing, both versions remain available online.
underpants
(189,952 posts)Once he echos I its dogma.
So - see the Snopes link at the response below your question - they aired both responses but these petty little pieces of crap are focusing on just the 60 Minutes episode
In our research, we found that CBS News did broadcast two different versions of Harris' answers to a series of questions she was asked about Netanyahu. One version aired on Oct. 6 on the Sunday-morning CBS News program "Face the Nation," and the other on "60 Minutes" the following day, during the show's primetime election special. As of this writing, both versions remain available online.
louis-t
(24,228 posts)it makes him stronger.
cbabe
(4,872 posts)Festivito
(13,690 posts)I can understand that there can be things that should be hidden, e.g. names and faces of camera operators perhaps. Fine. Blur it and explain the redaction. Put it up on YouTube.
There should not be any secret agents to hide with this.
mackdaddy
(1,748 posts)That makes about as much sense as this.
Joinfortmill
(17,836 posts)FormerOstrich
(2,810 posts)involved in this?
Paramount is considering settling which is bad enough. But now the FCC is stepping in? Tax dollars to investigate CBS's editing practices?
Paramount caving is going to feed the FCC investigation....fuel to restrict free speech, IMO. This is why Paramount should fight ...fight... fight. The more that cave the easier to get stomped.
The FCC stepping in is not a good thing.....all IMO
creeksneakers2
(7,639 posts)By January 21, 2029 there probably won't be much left.
LW1977
(1,497 posts)I wont be watching Colbert anymore in protest
Liberty Belle
(9,659 posts)Of course this is all nonsense--news outlets have zero obligation to turn over unedited transcripts or anything that was not aired or published.
This is a bad precedent.
Marcuse
(8,291 posts)Not only is he a sore loser, hes a sore winner.
orleans
(35,897 posts)MichMan
(14,873 posts)There is zero that anyone should be concerned about in those 60 Minutes interviews. She is just stuck in their minds, so they can't help themselves.
Initech
(104,495 posts)
pfitz59
(11,450 posts)First Amendment press protection? Gone!
AverageOldGuy
(2,530 posts)SWBTATTReg
(25,152 posts)to her lawyers so they can sue djt's a&& if need be. Sue him for slander, first most, and then follow up w/ other topics.
jmowreader
(52,123 posts)I could KINDA see doing this if Harris was totally incompetent (she is not) and clever editing managed to change enough minds about her to push her over the top.
But
Trump won.
It seems to me the person who really has a cause of action here is Harris because several of Trumps interviews were edited to make him look like hes not the crazy uncle no one invites to Thanksgiving dinner anymore.
Evolve Dammit
(20,502 posts)louis-t
(24,228 posts)gives in to his childish whims, it makes him stronger.
ificandream
(11,116 posts)I hope networks no longer edit his interviews. Leave all his belches and farts in the finished interviews, please.
totodeinhere
(13,598 posts)CBS sure did not show any profiles of courage.