US Senate Republicans block assault-style weapons ban as mass shootings rise
Source: Reuters
December 6, 20231:36 PM EST
WASHINGTON, Dec 6 (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Republicans moved to block a ban on assault-style weapons put forward by Democrats on Wednesday, as the United States recorded the highest number of mass shootings for the second year in a row.
The motion, put forward by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, would have reauthorized the Assault Weapons Ban, which first passed in 1994 and expired 10 years later.
The ban covers certain semi-automatic firearms and large capacity ammunition magazines, and ushered in a decrease of deaths from gun violence while it was in place. "The American people are sick and tired of enduring one mass shooting after another," Schumer said on Wednesday in a speech bringing the motion to the floor. "Theyre sick and tired of vigils and moments of silence for family, friends, classmates, coworkers."
Republican Senator John Barasso blocked Schumer's attempt to reauthorize the ban by unanimous consent. "Americans have a Constitutional right to own a firearm," he said in a speech on the Senate floor, arguing that the bill was about "trying to label responsible gun owners as criminals."
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senate-republicans-block-assault-style-weapons-ban-mass-shootings-rise-2023-12-06/
Schumer had attempted this via the fast-track "Unanimous Consent" motion (which is how many non-controversial laws are passed) except if there is an "objection", which is what happened here, and then that means it would be required to go through regular order (cloture vote, debate/amendments, final vote, etc.).
Walleye
(37,041 posts)Traildogbob
(10,382 posts)Just heard Randi mention it on her program, then saw this post about GQP. They need those weapons for trumps takeover after he loses again. No way will any GQP take those gun away, especially now they are dead in the water with a fair election
Walleye
(37,041 posts)We are being governed by people who are really unintelligent
The next Jan 6 will be armed. And according to GQP, Pelosi was all powerful to deploy the National Guard, (which is bullshit) does any one think Mike Johnson will not open the capital doors and demand Guard and Police not interfere with Trump terrorist in 2024, to install trump the Orange Jesus?
Walleye
(37,041 posts)Traildogbob
(10,382 posts)And it is gonna be a battle.
Walleye
(37,041 posts)BumRushDaShow
(145,769 posts)right after I posted.
llmart
(16,331 posts)Senator John Bar-asshole.
Kid Berwyn
(18,763 posts)Trump Extremists Demand Civil War, Mass Murder After New Indictment
Tom Dickinson
Rolling Stone, June 9, 2023
Extreme supporters of Donald Trump have met news of his federal indictment with visions of violence and retribution.
At The Donald, a forum for ultra-MAGA Trump supporters, users demanded public executions and other forms of lynching to avenge the federal prosecution of Trump, for the alleged mishandling of state secrets at Mar a Lago after he was no longer president.
The calls for violence appeared in comment threads, responding to posts on the front page of the forum Thursday night, after news broke of Trumps latest legal troubles. The most extreme comments were written in response to a fanciful post insisting the only solution to DOJs efforts to lock up Trump would be to vote him back into the presidency, so Trump could pardon himself and begin arresting those guilty of insurrection and sedition.
A user named Belac186 offered a far deadlier fix: The only way this country ever becomes anything like the Constitution says this country should be is if thousands of traitorous rats are publicly executed. Commenter DogFaceKilla quickly chimed in to offer supplies: I got some rope somewhere in the garage And Heavy_Metal_Patriot added: Hans says we can borrow the flammenwerfer a reference to a battlefield flame thrower used to by German soldiers in World War II.
The proposal for mass killing struck user BlackPilledMAGA as going too far: Doesnt have to be thousands, just a few dozen would do. Shit would STOP immediately. But user Nerdrem1 insisted taking out a few elites wouldnt make the difference, suggesting the number of dead required was on a genocidal scale: Millions. The real problem is the people that vote for them, as long as they exist the problem cant be solved. A user named Heavy_Metal_Patriot concurred: Correct.
Continues
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-extremists-demand-civil-war-202112664.html
republianmushroom
(18,548 posts)But once you are out of the womb your on your own. From cradle to grave with no help from them.
Well possibly a though and pray.
The assault ban does not stop one from owning a firearm. So the MAGraT's can still stroke their gun.
groundloop
(12,440 posts)The authors of the Second Amendment could have never foreseen the ultra efficient killing machines that are in use now. Gun humpers have been brainwashed into looking upon the Second Amendment as gospel, meanwhile our youth are being slaughtered by modern murder weapons. All so that the gun industry can earn a handsome profit.
sop
(12,069 posts)ananda
(31,090 posts)!!!
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)So what excuse does the murder cult have?
Response to Hermit-The-Prog (Reply #13)
Name removed Message auto-removed
William769
(56,435 posts)If you think I read the article wrong, I'm welcome to hear why.
Response to William769 (Reply #19)
Name removed Message auto-removed
carpetbagger
(4,995 posts)Clearly there's an understanding here about not allowing mass destruction by private citizens. The only difference is now a majority want that option out there.
The NRA and Reagan of course had a completely different view when it was black people open carrying, so the poster's contention about purpose and optics of gun ownership, brandishing and use holds weight
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)It is no longer a Supreme Court, it is an Extreme Cult.
See, e.g.,
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf
Or, for a summary:
Thomas changed the test courts are to use when analyzing the constitutionality of such regulations. Only firearm regulations that are consistent with this Nations historical tradition comply with Second Amendments protections, he wrote, in an assertion that puts in jeopardy any restriction that does not have a historical parallel to the nations founding.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/23/politics/second-amendment-gun-rights-supreme-court-new-york-test/index.html
This "court" distorts the Constitution to suit its ideology, rather than following logic, law and precedent.
Response to Hermit-The-Prog (Reply #22)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Response to Hermit-The-Prog (Reply #24)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Swede
(35,057 posts)And yes Japan. The guy there had to make his gun. Didn't have a military rifle with multiple magazines.
SYFROYH
(34,206 posts)Has the AWB been relegated to a political football for both parties?
BumRushDaShow
(145,769 posts)Democrats have attempted continually to get this in place, so by attempting a different tact of a renewal of what was an earlier, bipartisan bill that was allowed to expire, doing the "unanimous consent" puts on record who is blocking the removal of weapons of war out of the general public's hands.
SYFROYH
(34,206 posts)But youre right that a AWB wil pass if it ever gets the numbers.
BumRushDaShow
(145,769 posts)for what the Assault Weapons Ban was designed to do, but you knew that.
Polybius
(18,823 posts)Not now anyway.
Response to Polybius (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
riversedge
(73,875 posts)SouthernDem4ever
(6,618 posts)They can't go against their mother NRA.
Vinca
(51,407 posts)in case a shooter turns up in the produce section of the grocery store. It's true. I actually gave it some thought and made sure I knew where the back doors were. Yet they vote "no" when it comes to protecting Americans. More will die on a daily basis. It's obscene.
Demsrule86
(71,036 posts)but this is a gun-humping right-wing shit-spewing troll IMHO and if a consensus is reached at some later time...I am a nuke.
IronLionZion
(47,315 posts)because "Dems are coming for your guns, better buy lots more just in case". So Republicans benefit from mass shootings and using the threat of bans to pander to their idiot voters.
Lonestarblue
(12,105 posts)There is a mass shooting almost every day in the US. What the media often ignores is how many people are injured in these shootings is the number of injured, many with lifelong injuries such as paralysis or other injuries causing major life disruptions. The visual shows both those killed as well as those injured. It is a chilling but effective visual.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2021/may/27/us-mass-shootings-database
BumRushDaShow
(145,769 posts)with breakdowns (using various types of plots) for all mass shootings - https://www.theviolenceproject.org/mass-shooter-database/
For example -
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Imagine something like the animation in your sig, except it flashes for each mass shooting (or other, selectable gun violence) year by year.
BumRushDaShow
(145,769 posts)That site I linked to has that data in an animation (where you can hit a refresh icon to start it over).