Trump reiterates request that Chutkan recuse herself from his his Jan. 6 case

Delay! Delay! Dealy! All the shitbird knows.

TFG basically repeats most of the arguments made in first filing

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Here is a link to the filing
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.58.0.pdf

a black female really getting on Trump's nerves

of HIS precious right to a trial. We need to protect our rights from this consistent abuser of our country and his conspirators that attempted to destroy it in so many ways. Why, he's even intimated, if I parse more eloquently, that he confessed his malicious attempts to do so. It's time to put a FULL STOP on this indicted loser and former leader who has been criminally charged for bringing together ALL the domestic terrorists of 1/6. If he wants to protect his freedoms rather than his rights, he should STFU! He's been indicted after no less than a bipartisan congressional committee and an experienced investigative Special Prosecutor presented facts to a Grand Jury and a judge was selected. His lawyers know he hasn't got any defense against his charges! I've run out of patience; I've run out of watching him make a shitshow of his worst fears and mine. More delays MUST NOT HAPPEN! More insidious webs of words and deeds CANNOT HAPPEN! I've lost my patience with these sniveling manipulative abusers. For his own protection and ours, he needs to end his frivolous murderous campaign in a locked and solitary cell until the end of days - I can't think how best to see him and a complicit GOP/GQP party out of their misery covering for this monstrous individual's alleged deeds any longer. Nor can I hope for justice while that same bias persists in SCOTUS.

In the words of a 9/11 American victim of foreign terrorists who gave it all in an attempt to protect our Capitol and the democratic processes that sometimes take place there and as we contemplate the damage yet to be done by the GQP swine and their willfully ignorant, "Let's roll."

He should be addressed as the former Pretender.

Obfuscate, delay, bury the original lawsuit in a mountain of legal bullshit - that ALL unfortunately has to be sifted through like a litterbox.

He's answering here because the Judge gave him a deadline for rebuttal. I can't see where he expanded the argument. I think that his interpretation of the "disqualifying statement" is only what he needs or wishes it to be.

If the defendant before her is using Trump as an excuse, then IMO her comments are part of the legitimate explanation for the defendant. They may not like it, but that comment can be taken both ways. It is just not defined to the extent that you can say it definitely means what they want it to mean. It is just a statement of fact, even to emphasize that the defendant can't rely on his position because Trump is still walking around.

"The core value at issue here is whether the public will accept these proceedings as legitimate; or instead view them as a politically motivated effort by the incumbent administration to take out its most significant political opponent in a presidential campaign—the opponent who, by the way, is not only free, but has a strong lead in the polls" (page 9).

IMO, this statement completely undermines everything they said in pages 1-8. In their haste to make the point that they consider this entire indictment as being election interference, they have inadvertently supported Judge Chutkan's remark. Can you see it? I wouldn't be surprised if Trump was looking over their shoulders guiding their document. Lauro was never impressive on the news shows, and he does not impress here, either.

If she recuses herself, I shall be so disappointed.

period

And he keeps on losing!

Start fining him for a frivolous waste of the court's time.

Her statements were statements of fact, not opinion, not indicative of bias. And they were statements within the context of sentencing, used to support sentencing decisions. Can't see how facts used in sentencing others can be construed as bias.

They were following their leader. zilch there.

It was a reply to the DOJ opposition, specifically authorized by the court, filed by the deadline set by the court. And it didn't merely repeat the arguments from the initial motion, but took on and sought to rebut DOJ's legal arguments, including DOJ's characterizations of the relevant statutory standard and the case law.

I think Chutkan will deny the motion, but this is was one of the more professionally-written (with certain exceptions) filings made by Trump's lawyers.

Everyone knows Trump is a ruthless narcissistic sociopath who will do anything to win.
He will destroy as many people as it takes to get what he wants. This is a given
and not a surprise.

It is Chutkin's job to keep everyone connected to the trial safe.
And to prevent a miscarriage of justice by letting someone out on bail
taint the proceedings.

So far she is not doing her job.

She's doing her job extremely well.

The "experts" are always better at understanding the law than actual judges and lawyers it seems. Judge Chutkan is a badass. She is on top of this and will not be recusing herself for true statements that describe a situation accurately.

Wants Fani out
Wants Chutkan out
Wants prosecutor in NY case out?

Why NOT Cannon, hmmmmmm?

Oh never mind. We know.

from the United States and never return.....