Fri Mar 17, 2023, 06:10 AM
Omaha Steve (92,540 posts)
Regulators monitor cleanup of 400,000 gallon radioactive water leak in Minnesota
Source: AP
By STEVE KARNOWSK ST.. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — Minnesota regulators said Thursday they’re monitoring the cleanup of a leak of 400,000 gallons of radioactive water from Xcel Energy’s Monticello nuclear power plant, and the company said there’s no danger to the public. “Xcel Energy took swift action to contain the leak to the plant site, which poses no health and safety risk to the local community or the environment,” the Minneapolis-based utility said in a statement. While Xcel reported the leak of water containing tritium to state and federal authorities in late November, the spill had not been made public before Thursday. State officials said they waited to get more information before going public with it. “We knew there was a presence of tritium in one monitoring well, however Xcel had not yet identified the source of the leak and its location,” Minnesota Pollution Control Agency spokesman Michael Rafferty said. ![]() Read more: https://apnews.com/article/minnesota-xcel-energy-nuclear-radioactive-tritium-leak-c7a12ecb1b203179c5f7fef42bd0a3aa?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=TopNews&utm_campaign=position_03
|
10 replies, 1292 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Omaha Steve | Mar 17 | OP |
Emile | Mar 17 | #1 | |
sybylla | Mar 17 | #2 | |
Blues Heron | Mar 17 | #3 | |
Alexander Of Assyria | Mar 17 | #4 | |
Blues Heron | Mar 17 | #5 | |
Alexander Of Assyria | Mar 17 | #6 | |
womanofthehills | Mar 17 | #7 | |
flying_wahini | Mar 17 | #9 | |
Alexander Of Assyria | Saturday | #10 | |
sl8 | Mar 17 | #8 |
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 06:44 AM
Emile (11,892 posts)
1. The company said there's no danger to the public! Don't that give you
a nice warm relaxing feeling?
|
Response to Emile (Reply #1)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 08:41 AM
sybylla (7,977 posts)
2. Blazing warm.
JFC. How do corporations not understand it would just be better if they stopped characterizing everything they do as harmless when it's 98.9% BS.
|
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 09:37 AM
Blues Heron (4,827 posts)
3. tritium in the ground water already?
Nukes leak - period. They are so complex and the maintenence is so expensive that corners are inevitably cut. Then they will try to cove up the leaks- like here - they knew in November, now its March. WTF? |
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 09:38 AM
Alexander Of Assyria (4,617 posts)
4. Feds were notified...tritium heavily diluted in water is not a safety issue.
Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen that occurs naturally in the environment and is a common by-product of nuclear plant operations. It emits a weak form of beta radiation that does not travel very far and cannot penetrate human skin, according to the NRC. A person who drank water from a spill would get only a low dose, the NRC says.
|
Response to Alexander Of Assyria (Reply #4)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 10:20 AM
Blues Heron (4,827 posts)
5. would you drink it?
would you want it in your well?
|
Response to Blues Heron (Reply #5)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 10:37 AM
Alexander Of Assyria (4,617 posts)
6. Depends on the confirmed concentration of tritium in my glass.
External exposure to tritium gas or tritiated water is not very dangerous because tritium emits such a low energy beta particle that the radiation cannot penetrate the skin. Tritium does pose some health risks if it is ingested, inhaled, or enters the body through an open wound or injection. The biological half-life ranges from around 7 to 14 days, so bioaccumulation of tritium is not a significant concern. Because beta particles are a form of ionizing radiation, the expected health effect from internal exposure to tritium would be an elevated risk of developing cancer.
|
Response to Alexander Of Assyria (Reply #4)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 12:37 PM
womanofthehills (7,266 posts)
7. The big problem is drinking it everyday and who knows what else besides tritium is in the water
Other journal studies say it can penetrate the skin and if foods get contaminated with tritium we can ingest it.
I know the Oyster Creek reactor(now closed) at the Jersey shore released lots of tritium and people in a ten mile radius were offered iodine pills for quite a while. Don't know if the iodine was because of the tritium or other radioactive elements. |
Response to Alexander Of Assyria (Reply #4)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 02:44 PM
flying_wahini (4,988 posts)
9. So how about if you are drinking it everyday? Cooking with it? Bathing in it?
How about young children who will be exposed to it for decades? |
Response to flying_wahini (Reply #9)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 09:50 AM
Alexander Of Assyria (4,617 posts)
10. If one is wallowing hourly in tritium water, yes...dangerous!
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 12:53 PM
sl8 (11,881 posts)
8. Tritium limit for drinking water for various countries.
I was wondering what safety limits had been set and found this. I'm a bit surprised how much it varies between countries.
http://nuclearsafety.gc.ca/eng/resources/health/tritium/tritium-in-drinking-water.cfm Units are becquerels per litre (Bq/L). Country / Organization Tritium limit for drinking water (Bq/L)
Australia 76,103 Finland 30,000 WHO 10,000 Switzerland 10,000 Russia 7,700 Canada (Ontario) 7,000 United States 740 European Union 1 1001 ODWAC proposed limits 20 California Public Health Goal (not enforceable) 14.8 1 The EU does not use this number as a limit, but rather as a screening value to indicate the possible presence of other artifical radionuclides. |