HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Biden admin transfers a G...

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 12:20 PM

Biden admin transfers a Guantanamo detainee to Belize

Source: NBC News

The Biden administration transferred a detainee from the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on Thursday and is preparing to transfer at least two more in the coming weeks, according to two senior U.S. officials and a former senior administration official. 

Majid Khan left Guantanamo early Thursday and arrived in Belize several hours later, the officials said. He is the first detainee to be resettled by the Biden administration and one of the few to be sent to a location in the Western Hemisphere.

A Pakistani citizen and Guantanamo’s only known legal U.S. resident, Khan was granted asylum while attending high school near Baltimore in 1998. He returned to Pakistan in 2002 and, according to a Defense Department detainee assessment, joined Al Qaeda and became a direct subordinate to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, often known as KSM, Al Qaeda’s senior operational planner and the principal architect of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

KSM, according to the U.S. documents, tasked Khan with delivering money and transporting another senior Al Qaeda figure to carry out a deadly attack on the Marriott Hotel in Jakarta, Indonesia, in August 2003. KSM intended to use Khan to attack U.S. gas stations and water reservoirs, the U.S. alleges.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/biden-guantanamo-detainee-majid-khan-transferred-belize-rcna68166



Apparently this guy was kept at one of the CIA "black sites" in 2003 and transferred to Guantanamo in 2006. He plead guilty in 2012 and was sentenced to 10 years detention there, which was up last March.

NBC News says there are 34 left and they linked to this article that has a rough tally from March 2020 -

U.S. sends Saudi detainee accused of link to 9/11 home from Guantanamo


March 7, 2022, 7:08 PM EST
By Courtney Kube, Mosheh Gains and The Associated Press

A Saudi detainee at Guantanamo Bay who allegedly tried to take part in the 9/11 hijacking plot has been sent back to Saudi Arabia, the Pentagon said on Monday.


Al-Qahtani is the second Guantanamo prisoner released during the Biden administration. Nearly 800 detainees have been held at Guantanamo since 2002. Thirty-eight remain, including 10 who face trial by military commission. Five have alleged links to 9/11. Nineteen other detainees are awaiting repatriation or resettlement outside the U.S.

15 replies, 1087 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
Reply Biden admin transfers a Guantanamo detainee to Belize (Original post)
BumRushDaShow Feb 2 OP
Mr. Evil Feb 2 #1
BumRushDaShow Feb 2 #5
Mr. Evil Feb 2 #7
BumRushDaShow Feb 2 #8
C0RI0LANUS Feb 2 #2
slumcamper Feb 2 #3
BumRushDaShow Feb 2 #6
C0RI0LANUS Feb 2 #9
BumRushDaShow Feb 2 #10
C0RI0LANUS Feb 2 #11
BumRushDaShow Feb 2 #12
C0RI0LANUS Feb 2 #13
BumRushDaShow Feb 2 #14
C0RI0LANUS Feb 2 #15
C0RI0LANUS Feb 2 #4

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 01:00 PM

1. So...

Why Belize?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mr. Evil (Reply #1)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 01:51 PM

5. The article did mention the considerations

and how Blinken had been working on it for awhile -

The Biden administration reached out to about a dozen countries to find a place to resettle Khan, now 42. In the end, Secretary of State Antony Blinken was personally involved in negotiating the deal with Belize, according to two U.S. officials. A senior State Department official said the issue was one of the items on the agenda during a meeting with the Belizean prime minister in September, but said the U.S. and Belize had been discussing the issue for months before that.

The senior State Department official said the U.S. looked at a lot of countries where Khan might be transferred, factoring in locations that have a good relationship with the U.S., have the ability to support the individual, including any medical or security requirements, and have the political willingness.

“This is a political ask,” the official said. “Belize was a great choice because, ultimately, we have a lot of things to do with them.” The official said Belize was willing to take Khan in part as a humanitarian gesture. 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #5)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 02:25 PM

7. Ah...

I missed the link. Thanx!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mr. Evil (Reply #7)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 02:31 PM

8. You're welcome

because when I first saw the breaking news banner and went to read the article before posting, I was also like, "Huh? Why Belize?"

This guy actually had a U.S. green card (resident) and apparently has relatives still here so that arrangement might also be an easier way for them to get access to him. I expect there are some other goodies that we must be throwing in as part of the agreement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 01:02 PM

2. Pres Biden is trying to close up Guantanamo Bay, like the "Forever Wars"

The remaining detainees should be transferred to an FCI for trial or released. I think Colorado has two co-located-- one being a Supermax. Hey, GQP: They are escape proof.

Guantanamo Bay was more of an Inquisition than a gold-mine of al-Qaida super-plots.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to C0RI0LANUS (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 01:27 PM

3. Fodder for Tucker?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to C0RI0LANUS (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 02:12 PM

6. Congress must approve it

and THAT has been the damn problem since Obama was in office.

"No one" wants them "in their backyards" so they have not only refused to move them to prisons on U.S. soil but have refused to FUND the closure of the facility.


They REFUSED in 2009

Senate Democrats reject funding for Guantánamo closure
This article is more than 13 years old
Vote is the latest setback for the Obama administration following criticism over reinstating military tribunals


Daniel Nasaw in Washington and agencies
Wed 20 May 2009 12.36 EDT


President Barack Obama's campaign pledge to shut the prison at Guantánamo Bay was rejected by his own party yesterday when Senate Democrats joined their Republican counterparts in voting not to pay for the closure. The vote is the latest setback for the Obama administration, which has been widely criticised by supporters for deciding to restart the controversial military tribunals for detainees, first established by President George Bush, but halted by Obama when he came to office.

The 90-6 vote in the Senate follows a similar decision in the House of Representatives last week - a clear sign to Obama that he may struggle to convince the Democratic-controlled Congress to agree with his plans to shut down the detention centre and move the 240 detainees.

Last month, Obama asked for $80m (£60m) for the Pentagon and the US justice department to close the facility at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, by January. The administration put its congressional Democratic allies in a difficult spot by requesting the Guantánamo closure money before developing a plan for what to do with its detainees.

Obama is scheduled to give a major address tomorrow outlining in more detail his plans for Guantánamo, but it's already clear that Congress has little appetite for bringing detainees to US soil, even if the inmates would be held in maximum-security prisons.

(snip)

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/may/20/close-guantanamo-funding-senate-obama


They REFUSED in 2014


December 1, 20148:08 PMUpdated 8 years ago
Congress deals blow to plan to shut Guantanamo prison

By Reuters Staff



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lawmakers dealt a blow to President Barack Obama’s five-year-long effort to close the prison camp at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba by omitting a plan to shut the facility from an annual defense authorization bill.

U.S. Senator Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told reporters on Monday that the final version of the massive bill will not allow the president to transfer inmates to the United States. “Our language (on Guantanamo) ... will not be in,” Levin said.

The defense bill, which has been passed annually for more than half a century, is likely to be approved by the House of Representatives and Senate in the coming days and then sent to the White House for Obama to sign into law.

Obama has promised to shut the detainee camp since he entered the White House in early 2009, citing its damage to the U.S. reputation around the world. He has so far been unable to do so, partly because of resistance from Congress.

(snip)

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guantanamo-congress/congress-deals-blow-to-plan-to-shut-guantanamo-prison-idUSKCN0JG01L20141202


In 2018, the LAST "President" (in quotes) REFUSED to close it and wanted to expand it

US military plans for future at Guantanamo because of Trump

By Ben Fox, The Associated Press
 Jun 7, 2018


GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba — A new dining hall for guards at the Guantanamo Bay detention center has a shimmering view of the Caribbean and a lifespan of 20 years. Barracks scheduled to start getting built next year are meant to last five decades. And the Pentagon has asked Congress to approve money for a new super-max prison unit to be designed with the understanding that prisoners will likely grow old and frail in custody — some perhaps still without being convicted of a crime.

President Donald Trump’s order in January to keep the Guantanamo jail open, and allow the Pentagon to bring new prisoners there, is prompting military officials to consider a future for the controversial facility that the Obama administration sought to close. Officials talked about the plans in an unusually frank manner as a small group of journalists toured the isolated base where 40 men are still held behind tall fences and coils of razor wire on the southeastern coast of Cuba.

“We’ve got to plan for the long term,” Army Col. Stephen Gabavics, commander of the guard force, told reporters this week. “We ultimately have to plan for whether or not they are going to be here for the rest of their lives.”

(snip)

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2018/06/08/us-military-plans-as-if-guantanamo-wont-close-for-decades/


So after almost 15 fucking years, someone in Congress finally got the damn message, but it was too late because they would have needed GOP votes to do it -

Republicans scoff as Democrats try to close Gitmo again

by Aris Folley and Jordan Williams - 07/05/22 5:16 AM ET


Democrats are reviving their efforts to shutter the Guantánamo Bay detention facility, but the push faces an uphill battle in the Senate, where Republicans are already writing it off as doomed.

In the past month, House Democrats have advanced legislation seeking to close the facility in Cuba as part of a larger annual defense spending bill leaders are expected to bring to a vote in the full chamber, where the party holds narrow control, in the coming weeks. 

But in the Senate, where Democrats will need GOP support to pass the defense funding bill, the move faces a wall of opposition from Republicans.

“I’m sure it’s not going to happen,” Sen. James Inhofe (Okla.), the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, told The Hill, adding “no rational person’s going to support that. It’s an absolutely vital institution.”

(snip)

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/3544387-republicans-scoff-as-dems-try-to-close-gitmo-again/


We had 8 years of bullshit spewed on DU about Guantanamo Bay and "Why hasn't Obama closed it", showing a clear refusal to understand the problem and how government works.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #6)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 02:52 PM

9. Nobody on DU should have been blaming Pres Obama for the Gitmo fiasco.

Perhaps the better language is "expediting the trials, transfers, or releases of the detainees," and leave Gitmo hollow like the Bastille-- a grim reminder of a cruel and feudal system.

The GQP did everything they could to undermine America's first President of color: Sabotage Obamacare, deny Merrick Garland a seat on SCOTUS, and prevent him from closing Gitmo.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to C0RI0LANUS (Reply #9)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 03:09 PM

10. I have been here for almost 15 years (next week)

and it was obscene (and I know you are new).

Unfortunately our own party's excuse (members of Congress) was that they "wanted to see a plan" - with the obvious caveat that NONE of the detainees were to be resettled in prisons here in the U.S. and not many here on DU "got the memo". It was non-stop bashing.

I don't know how many damn posts I have done trying to point out all the Congressional blocking.

For example -

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=356973

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #10)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 04:04 PM

11. All of that explaining must have been exhausting.

I read the linked thread, thank you. One day I may relate a story to you about Gitmo-- maybe via email-- but not today. You are already atop the internal and external mechanisms surrounding this testament to man's indifference to man.

Coriolanus

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to C0RI0LANUS (Reply #11)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 04:15 PM

12. I am a retired fed

and I know that to do anything associated with the federal government, it has to have funding - and that even means closing any government facilities, which requires appropriations designated to do it. Since 2009, Congress has been explicitly banning any funding in the annual NDAA for closing that facility.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #12)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 04:18 PM

13. 1811?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to C0RI0LANUS (Reply #13)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 04:44 PM

14. 1320

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #14)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 04:50 PM

15. Thanks. Check your email please.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Thu Feb 2, 2023, 01:48 PM

4. Belize is a major recipient of US foreign aid.

This is probably a quid pro quo. "You get more funding, Belize, but please take this thorn out of my side." I think Albania or Kosovo is in a similar situation.

This particular ex-detainee is on all the watch-lists and will probably get wire-tapped from time to time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread