Tue Jan 31, 2023, 02:17 PM
BumRushDaShow (110,019 posts)
EPA vetoes controversial Alaska mining project in effort to protect salmon population
Source: ABC News
The Environmental Protection Agency has vetoed a controversial proposed gold and copper mine in Alaska. Pebble Limited Partnership, the company that would control the mine commonly known as Pebble Mine, argues it would bring economic opportunity to the Bristol Bay region of Alaska. However, the location of the mine and the infrastructure needed for it to become operational is the focus of a coalition of local Alaska Natives, fishermen and conservation groups concerned about the environmental impact it would have on the Bristol Bay watershed, which is home to the world’s largest sockeye salmon fishery. “After extensive review of scientific and technical research spanning two decades, and robust stakeholder engagement, EPA has determined that certain discharges associated with developing the Pebble deposit will have unacceptable adverse effects on certain salmon fishery areas in the Bristol Bay watershed,” the EPA said in a statement Monday. The EPA, citing the Clean Water Act, said it has the authority to veto the project because of the impact of "certain discharges of dredged or fill material associated with development of a mine at the Pebble deposit." Pebble Limited Partnership said it will fight the EPA's decision, which it said will hurt the economic opportunity for local residents. Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/epa-vetoes-controversial-alaska-mining-project-effort-protect/story?id=96770254 Good. ![]()
|
8 replies, 1008 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
BumRushDaShow | Jan 31 | OP |
Faux pas | Jan 31 | #1 | |
Magoo48 | Jan 31 | #2 | |
republianmushroom | Jan 31 | #3 | |
Warpy | Jan 31 | #4 | |
2naSalit | Jan 31 | #8 | |
Historic NY | Jan 31 | #5 | |
Canoe52 | Jan 31 | #6 | |
Bayard | Jan 31 | #7 |
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2023, 02:18 PM
Faux pas (13,683 posts)
1. Kickin' With Gusto!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2023, 02:41 PM
Magoo48 (3,899 posts)
2. Yahooooooooo
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2023, 03:04 PM
republianmushroom (5,871 posts)
3. like it
thank you EPA for this
|
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2023, 03:17 PM
Warpy (106,553 posts)
4. Good. Those greedy bastards kill off the salmon, nobody eats.
That's how important salmon are to coastal Alaskans.
|
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2023, 03:24 PM
Historic NY (36,589 posts)
5. Robust stakeholders...meanwhile Pebble is well Canadian owned.
The Pebble partnership, owned by Canada-based Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd., is appealing a decision from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during the Trump administration in 2020 that denied approval of a key permit for the project in southwest Alaska.Sep 7, 2022
In the Fall of 2020, both Alaskan Senators announced their strong opposition to the mine, as did candidate, now President, Joe Biden. The Trump Administration's Army Corps of Engineers denied a permit for the project in November 2020. Looks like no one except bloodsuckers wanted it. They even had a well organized media promising jobs. |
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Tue Jan 31, 2023, 03:40 PM
Canoe52 (2,888 posts)
6. But look they're really just doing it for the locals!
“Pebble Limited Partnership…said will hurt the economic opportunity for local residents”
![]() |