Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychological operations
Source: Washington Post
WP EXCLUSIVE
Pentagon opens sweeping review of clandestine psychological operations
Complaints about the U.S. militarys influence operations using Facebook and Twitter have raised concern in the White House and federal agencies.
By Ellen Nakashima
September 19, 2022 at 5:00 a.m. EDT
The Pentagon has ordered a sweeping audit of how it conducts clandestine information warfare after major social media companies identified and took offline fake accounts suspected of being run by the U.S. military in violation of the platforms rules. ... Colin Kahl, the undersecretary of defense for policy, last week instructed the military commands that engage in psychological operations online to provide a full accounting of their activities by next month after the White House and some federal agencies expressed mounting concerns over the Defense Departments attempted manipulation of audiences overseas, according to several defense and administration officials familiar with the matter.
The takedowns in recent years by Twitter and Facebook of more than 150 bogus personas and media sites created in the United States was disclosed last month by internet researchers Graphika and the Stanford Internet Observatory. While the researchers did not attribute the sham accounts to the U.S. military, two officials familiar with the matter said that U.S. Central Command is among those whose activities are facing scrutiny. Like others interviewed for this report, they spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military operations.
The researchers did not specify when the takedowns occurred, but those familiar with the matter said they were within the past two or three years. Some were recent, they said, and involved posts from the summer that advanced anti-Russia narratives citing the Kremlins imperialist war in Ukraine and warning of the conflicts direct impact on Central Asian countries. Significantly, they found that the pretend personas employing tactics used by countries such as Russia and China did not gain much traction, and that overt accounts actually attracted more followers.
Centcom, headquartered in Tampa, has purview over military operations across 21 countries in the Middle East, North Africa and Central and South Asia. A spokesman declined to comment. ... Air Force Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder, the Pentagon press secretary, said in a statement that the militarys information operations support our national security priorities and must be conducted in compliance with relevant laws and policies. We are committed to enforcing those safeguards, he said.
{snip}
Alice Crites contributed to this report.
By Ellen Nakashima
Ellen Nakashima is a national security reporter with The Washington Post. She was a member of two Pulitzer Prize-winning teams, in 2018 for coverage of Russia's interference in the 2016 election, and in 2014 and for reporting on the hidden scope of government surveillance. Twitter https://twitter.com/nakashimae
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/09/19/pentagon-psychological-operations-facebook-twitter/
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)folks! After a years long investigation.
Look away
.and give another 840 billion a year, taxpayers of America!
Money well spent, am I right!??
Bayard
(23,796 posts)"that advanced anti-Russia narratives citing the Kremlins imperialist war in Ukraine and warning of the conflicts direct impact on Central Asian countries?"
wnylib
(23,852 posts)harumph
(2,171 posts)Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)It is not democracy, democracy has to play by the rules or its not democracy.
The military spend wherever it can to justify its bloated budgets.
Farmer-Rick
(11,034 posts)"But if anyone needed a reminder of the dangers of domestic propaganda efforts, the past 12 months provided ample reasons. Last year, two USA Today journalists were ensnared in a propaganda campaign after reporting about millions of dollars in back taxes owed by the Pentagons top propaganda contractor in Afghanistan. Eventually, one of the co-owners of the firm confessed to creating phony websites and Twitter accounts to smear the journalists anonymously. Additionally, just this month, the Washington Post exposed a counter-propaganda program by the Pentagon that recommended posting comments on a U.S. website run by a Somali expat with readers opposing al-Shabab. "Today, the military is more focused on manipulating news and commentary on the Internet, especially social media, by posting material and images without necessarily claiming ownership," reported the Post."
https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/
So, I guess they just continued with their very shoddy propaganda attempts.
Now I have to wonder if they have been helping out TFG with some pro Trump posts and trolling.
jaxexpat
(7,545 posts)Look, the sword has at least two edges. In addition to being a "yes or no" question.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,268 posts)orangecrush
(21,134 posts)certainot
(9,090 posts)they need to look at use of rw radio too. putin's probably using it more now though
herding cats
(19,585 posts)I'm going to guess the demographics following the Russian invasion spotted them and blew them off?
Many of us are hardened to fake accounts on social media now. They only resonate with the more simpleminded, even if their message is similar to ours. Perhaps even especially if their messages are similar. New accounts being overly aggressive on any issue is a red flag of a bot or a troll.
Many are jaded now and have serious trust issues on social media.
Martin68
(24,254 posts)Propaganda is not necessarily negative or unfactual. It is designed to influence opinions. Voice of America broadcast real news stories and rock music into the USSR for years. The truth can be more effective than lies.
summer_in_TX
(3,079 posts)can work but it cannot be from any branch of our government.
The malarkey being spouted on FOX, OAN, RW radio and website cries out for the truth to be presented in ways that may be able to break through.
Nonprofits, especially nonprofit news outlets, could be helpful in countering the mis- and dis-information.