Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:10 PM
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (87,800 posts)
Mistrial denied as jury weighs damages against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook defamation trial
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - A Texas judge denied Alex Jones's motion for a mistrial on Thursday as jury deliberations resumed in a defamation case over the U.S. conspiracy theorist’s false claims about the Sandy Hook mass shooting. The mistrial request followed the disclosure at trial that Jones's lawyer accidentally sent two years of the U.S. conspiracy theorist's text messages to the plaintiffs. Federico Andino Reynal, an attorney for Jones, told Judge Maya Guerra Gamble that attorneys for the plaintiffs should have immediately destroyed the records. An attorney for the parents, Mark Bankston, used the texts to undercut Jones’ testimony during cross-examination on Wednesday. Jones, founder of the Infowars radio show and webcast, is on trial to determine the amount of damages he owes for spreading falsehoods about the killing of 20 children and six staff at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, 2012. Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mistrial-denied-as-jury-weighs-damages-against-alex-jones-in-sandy-hook-defamation-trial/ar-AA10jfGM
|
18 replies, 1657 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin | Thursday | OP |
AllaN01Bear | Thursday | #1 | |
emulatorloo | Thursday | #3 | |
EndlessWire | Thursday | #13 | |
ZZenith | Saturday | #18 | |
viva la | Thursday | #2 | |
slumcamper | Thursday | #4 | |
BumRushDaShow | Thursday | #5 | |
TomSlick | Thursday | #8 | |
BumRushDaShow | Thursday | #10 | |
TomSlick | Thursday | #12 | |
EndlessWire | Thursday | #14 | |
BumRushDaShow | Friday | #17 | |
ancianita | Thursday | #6 | |
thucythucy | Thursday | #7 | |
Bayard | Thursday | #9 | |
SunImp | Thursday | #11 | |
tavernier | Thursday | #15 | |
LudwigPastorius | Friday | #16 |
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:13 PM
AllaN01Bear (9,456 posts)
1. sorry charlie .
|
Response to AllaN01Bear (Reply #1)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:19 PM
emulatorloo (38,758 posts)
3. Aw. Will have to play Jones a sad song on my tiny violin.
Don’t feel the least bit sorry for this seditionist serial liar. As seen in another thread:
Link to tweet |
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #3)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 11:06 PM
EndlessWire (4,356 posts)
13. That was refreshing. n/t
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #3)
Sat Aug 6, 2022, 02:27 AM
ZZenith (3,610 posts)
18. I am so thoroughly impressed by that judge.
The little interactions she has with her coworkers says so much about her as a person - she is considerate and efficient, knowledgeable and fair. Everything one could want in a jurist.
|
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:17 PM
viva la (1,799 posts)
2. Why should they have destroyed the records?
The file was sent to them by the other counsel, who was offered a chance to get it back, and ... apparently never noticed.
(Or maybe he hates his client and wants him to lose. ) |
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:33 PM
slumcamper (1,453 posts)
4. Check this out
"The Reynal Law Firm, P.C. is recognized as one of the State’s premier criminal litigation firms."
![]() "Our lawyers successfully handle significant criminal matters in courts across the country. We bring a unique blend of talent, tenacity and teamwork to every case we handle in the relentless pursuit of the best possible outcomes for our clients." ![]() Texas law...you betcha! for additional amusement: [link:https://frlaw.us/| |
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:39 PM
BumRushDaShow (99,387 posts)
5. "request followed the disclosure..that Jones's lawyer accidentally sent two years of..text messages"
Unless the judge ruled it inadmissible with jury instructions to disregard, how would this constitute justification for a mistrial?
![]() These entitled asses are so used to bullshitting their way out of taking responsibility for their chronic malfeasance that they think that doing this will always work in every instance. ![]() |
Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #5)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:45 PM
TomSlick (9,835 posts)
8. There was no way a mistrial was going to be ordered.
The defense lawyers are simply building a record for appeal.
Inadvertent disclosure by counsel can be an issue if the disclosed matter is somehow privileged, e.g. attorney/client communications. (The rules vary from state to state.) In this case, it seems to me the disclosed material was not only not privileged but should have been disclosed in discovery. I only know what I read on DU and the news but I don't see this as a serious issue. |
Response to TomSlick (Reply #8)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:52 PM
BumRushDaShow (99,387 posts)
10. Right
It's grasping at straws.
There have been video clips of the exchange between the prosecutors and Jones (one of the shorter ones) - |
Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #10)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 07:50 PM
TomSlick (9,835 posts)
12. When a trial is going sour, all that remains is to make a record for appeal.
I don't see much hope for an appeal but all I know is what I've read DU and the news.
|
Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #10)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 11:13 PM
EndlessWire (4,356 posts)
14. Did you see the way the Judge was looking at him?
She scares me, and I'm just a spectator. And he's sweating, and trying to spin it his way. Good grief.
|
Response to EndlessWire (Reply #14)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 04:30 AM
BumRushDaShow (99,387 posts)
17. All I could think of that was
watching a younger and calmer version of "Judge Judy".
![]() (I can imagine the crap that civil case judges must hear day after day) |
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:39 PM
ancianita (27,845 posts)
6. ...
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:43 PM
thucythucy (6,819 posts)
7. Imagine if this tactic worked.
"My client is about to get screwed because this civil case is so open and shut. So I'll just do something supremely stupid and then ask for a mistrial."
Repeat as many times as needed until the plaintiffs give up. |
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:47 PM
Bayard (15,567 posts)
9. Should have gotten advice from the Secret Service
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 02:00 PM
SunImp (2,144 posts)
11. Good news
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 11:20 PM
tavernier (10,616 posts)
15. Ha, I nailed it!
Yesterday I posted that he might ask for a mistrial.
And my DU friends who are knowledgeable of the law answered that he would be SOL on that. ![]() |
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 12:15 AM
LudwigPastorius (4,802 posts)
16. Who was Jones' attorney?
Lionel Hutz?
![]() |