Amazon shareholders nix warehouse working conditions audit
Source: AP
Amazon shareholders on Wednesday voted down a proposal calling for an independent audit of working conditions at the e-commerce behemoths warehouses.
The proposals defeat at the Seattle-based companys annual shareholder meeting came despite calls from activist groups and unions to improve labor conditions at the warehouses where customer orders are sorted, packaged and shipped.
Amazon had recommended shareholders vote against the proposal and 14 others presented at the meeting, a record for the company. All the resolutions were voted down by a majority of shareholders, the company said, citing preliminary voting results. It did not release shareholder vote totals Wednesday, but its expected to release them in regulatory filings.
Many of the resolutions focused on workers rights and issues such as further disclosure of the companys lobbying and taxes. The resolutions are nonbinding, but usually pressure corporate boards to take action.
FILE - In this Feb. 14, 2019, file photo, people stand in the lobby for Amazon offices in New York. Amazon shareholders on Wednesday, May 25, 2022 voted down a proposal calling for an independent audit of working conditions at the e-commerce behemoth's warehouses. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/workers-rights-75848d9fb0a71b8a83a60eb8ee0e9dc1
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)...
Prof. Toru Tanaka
(1,951 posts)My wallet says "Fuck You" to Amazon.
C Moon
(12,212 posts)ZonkerHarris
(24,220 posts)Rebl2
(13,490 posts)paleotn
(17,911 posts)DENVERPOPS
(8,809 posts)Fascist Corporations of America............simplest definition of fascism is a merger of corporations and government
CloudWatcher
(1,846 posts)I have for years now.
ProfessorGAC
(64,993 posts)2 people. One holds 100 shares. Votes yes.
The other is a fund manager who proxy votes 1 million shares. Votes no.
Two people voting, but the noes have it by 999,900 votes.
bucolic_frolic
(43,124 posts)lonely bird
(1,685 posts)Remove any limited liability they may have.
Warpy
(111,241 posts)The more stock you own, the bigger your vote. Own a few hundred shares in your nest egg, you might as well not bother.
My guess is that Bezos still owns the lion's share. His vote would be biggest.
Igel
(35,296 posts)The votes all get counted but not all votes count equally.
Sue puts in $25M, Cam puts in $25, I put in $2.5. Sue has much more skin in the game than I have. If Cam and I vote to do something that destroys the business, we lose $27.50. Sue loses $25M.
I could see activists on either side having 10k people each buy up a miniscule share of stock just, in an unweighted democratic kind of voting, capture a company. Not what the system's meant for, and it would seriously damage the economy.
Warpy
(111,241 posts)No, it's not skin in the game, it's property. It's mpt speech, as the Roberts court stupidly ruled, it's only property. As such, it needs to be regulated, otherwise we can resign ourselves to a government that rules against the will of the people in perpetuity, the exact opposite of what anyone but the rich ever intended.
PatrickforB
(14,570 posts)They are SHAREHOLDERS, and we hold their profits above all else, as a matter of policy complete with a state supreme court ruling. When we hear someone say that corporations hold profits over people, they DO. They have to. It is a legal precedent, and this is why capitalism profoundly SUCKS. It is too much about profits, and not enough about workers, communities, consumers and the environment itself.
Capitalism
Sucks
DENVERPOPS
(8,809 posts)Thank you Patrick........
70sEraVet
(3,491 posts)Hotler
(11,415 posts)As consumers and workers we have two tools to use to fight back against TPTB, our votes and our wallets and pocketbooks. Our spending dollar is powerful if we use it.