Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 01:30 PM Oct 2012

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: Re-elect Obama: The made-over Mitt Romney is no alternative (Endorsement)

Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

In making his case to be the nominee for his radically more conservative party, Mr. Romney had to pretend to be someone he wasn't. As part of this makeover, he has promised to scuttle Obamacare, even though it was modeled after his own successful state health care plan, and with only vague notions of how to replace it.

Driven by the political need to repudiate Mr. Obama's bailouts, he stooped so low as to say he would have allowed a large part of the auto industry in Michigan, where he grew up, to go into bankruptcy, which would have doomed it along with millions of jobs. This was not his father's Republicanism.

Because they have been such implacable critics of Mr. Obama's policies, we know what the Republicans would have done -- and by extension now, Mr. Romney will do -- with control of the White House. There will be no stimulus money for jobs, regulations will be cut back severely on the environment and Wall Street (where the recession was hatched due to loose rules in the first place) and, of course, the well-to-do will be showered with tax cuts.

With a Romney victory, the nation would return to the fiction of the George W. Bush years -- that taxes could be slashed, revenues wouldn't suffer and the deficit wouldn't swell. Mr. Romney says he can cut tax rates for individuals by 20 percent by removing certain deductions, but he won't say clearly what they are. This is ideological alchemy in search of fool's gold. The less polite term is baloney.


Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/editorials/re-elect-obama-the-made-over-mitt-romney-is-no-alternative-659567/



Another Newspaper endorsement of President Obama.

Ironically, when newspapers have endorsed Mitt Romney, it has mainly been because recalcitrant Republicans in Congress would be more willing to work with him, which strikes me as giving House Republicans a free pass. In other words, why punish the reasonable party and reward the party that is more interested in scoring political points, than governing the Nation.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: Re-elect Obama: The made-over Mitt Romney is no alternative (Endorsement) (Original Post) TomCADem Oct 2012 OP
Ha! SoapBox Oct 2012 #1
Last week, the Scaife-owned right-wing paper in Steel City, the Tribune-Review, endorsed Romney. alp227 Oct 2012 #2
very good editorial/endorsement renate Oct 2012 #3
Wonderful endorsement. So many good comments. I particularly like the final summation below, wisteria Oct 2012 #4

alp227

(32,018 posts)
2. Last week, the Scaife-owned right-wing paper in Steel City, the Tribune-Review, endorsed Romney.
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 04:48 PM
Oct 2012
http://triblive.com/opinion/editorials/2786321-74/mitt-romney-president-america-policy-government-obama-public-scandal-think

As Cenk would say: "OF COOOOURSE!!!"

I wonder how many cities out there have two papers with politically different editorial boards besides Pitt?

In San Francisco, the Examiner (the tabloid-formatted newspaper) used to have a right-wing ed board that endorsed McCain in 2008. This year, the Examiner editorial board proudly proclaimed: "Today, as a different paper under new ownership, we wholeheartedly endorse Barack Obama and Joe Biden for a second term so that they can move forward with reforms this country needs." Meanwhile, it's no secret the San Francisco Chronicle ed board is liberal. Nonetheless, the SFC made sure to point out in its its pro-Obama editorial: "President Obama has disappointed some partisans on the left with his hawkishness on foreign affairs and his willingness to compromise on fiscal issues...This nation needed - and received - a steady, measured president who is neither beholden to ideological dogma nor fearful of taking risks for what is right."

Hmm...now back to my main topic:

Cincinnati used to have two newspapers: the Enquirer with a left-leaning ed board and the Post with a right-leaning ed board. In 2007, the Post shut down and merged with the Enquirer.

Boston has the Globe with a liberal ed board (the NY Times Company owning the paper is probably why) and Herald with conservative ed board. Not to mention the exposes on Romney the Globe has broken such as Romney's dishonest testimony about Staples stock and questioning when exactly did Romney leave Bain Capital. On the other hand, the Herald was the first Boston-area paper to question Elizabeth Warren's claims of Native American ancestry. Oh, local right wing yapper Howie Carr has a column there too.

Detroit: the Free Press (a Gannett property) to the left, the News (MediaNews Group, which also owns my local paper in SJ) to the right. (No, the Detroit Free Press's freep.com domain name has nothing to do with Freepers.)

Chicago: I guess the Sun-Times is to the left because it endorsed Kerry in 2004 and Obama in 2008, while the Tribune (the larger-circulation Chicagoland paper, owned by Tribune Media) endorsed Bush in 2004, then Obama in 2008.

For both the 2004 and 2008 elections, both Seattle dailies (the Post-Intelligencer and Times) endorsed the Democratic candidates. Ditto with Philadelphia (the Daily News tabloid and Inquirer)

Tampa has two papers now: the Tribune that endorsed Romney this year and Times that is for Obama (the Times used to be based in St. Petersburg.)

New York City: the Times to the most left, the Daily News tabloid I think is also liberal (it endorsed Obama in '08, and Juan Gonzalez of Democracy Now works there), and the Post tabloid (a News Corporation/Murdoch paper) is to the right.

The Minneapolis/St. Paul area: the statewide-published Star-Tribune to the left (Obama both times), the St. Paul Pioneer-Press to the right (Bush in 2004).

Las Vegas: the Review-Journal went for Bush, McCain, and now Romney. Not to mention that the owner of that paper (Righthaven Media) tried to sue DU over copyright infringement, am I correct? At least the LVRJ is packaged with the Las Vegas Sun, which went for Obama this year.

Washington, DC: the Post has the more left-wing board. The Times (formerly owned by the Rev. Sun Myung Moon...enough said) and the competing tabloid Examiner...you know where they are.

Los Angeles: the Times (a Tribune company) and Daily News (MediaNews Group) both endorsed the Democrats in '04 and '08. But the LAT went for Obama this year, the LADN for Romney (while also supporting current Dem senator Dianne Feinstein).

Salt Lake City: the statewide-oriented Deseret News is owned by an LDS church-owned corporation thus has a right-leaning ed board. That paper does not endorse presidential candidates, but the Salt Lake Tribune went for Obama both years.

Source for 2004, 2008 endorsements

Source for 2012 endorsements
 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
4. Wonderful endorsement. So many good comments. I particularly like the final summation below,
Sun Oct 28, 2012, 06:25 PM
Oct 2012

"This well may be a generation-defining moment. What will America's future be? Will this still be a land of opportunity and freedom for all people or just for the favored few? Because we still hope, we endorse for president Barack Obama, whose heart -- unlike his challenger -- has not wavered nor his principles changed." edited to add quotes.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: ...