Federal prosecutor doesn't rule out charging Trump for inciting Capitol riot
Source: CNBC
The top federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C., on Thursday pointedly did not rule out charging President Donald Trump in connection with inciting a riot where his supporters invaded the U.S. Capitol complex a day earlier.
This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/07/federal-prosecutor-doesnt-rule-out-prosecuting-trump-for-inciting-capitol-riot.html
The Velveteen Ocelot
(121,125 posts)Then we'll see if he can really do it. I think not.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,946 posts)There is precedent for that. Pence could be President for a day/week/whatever. William Henry Harrison would finally be knocked off the shortest tenure platform.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(121,125 posts)It's hard to sign a pardon from under a bus.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,946 posts)...and I get that Trump feels betrayed. I think others would talk Pence into it "for the good of the country."
thesquanderer
(12,364 posts)We know that pardon's don't affect state charges. D.C. is not a state, but it does have its own local government... I'm guessing a pardon would not help him there, I don't think D.C. charges count as federal charges, do they?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(121,125 posts)DC has its own criminal code; those crimes are not covered by federal statutes. So presumably a violation of a DC criminal statute would not be pardonable.
Lonestarblue
(11,862 posts)One is the Justice Department opinion that a sitting president cannot be indicted. And the second is the ability of a president to pardon himself for all crimes committed in office.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Its about time we destroyed those two canards with judicial rulings.
Duppers
(28,249 posts)His minions will just blame Biden/Biden's administration.
Problem, however, is would we get those rulings changed at this time? That's definitely not ensured, is it?
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)The DOJ simply took these positions and refused prosecute. That then became, not a policy but a practice. Its always dicey to take a case to court - but I think its worth the risk to affirm that no one is above the law and that self pardons are unconstitutional.
Duppers
(28,249 posts)dalton99a
(84,496 posts)Response to dalton99a (Reply #3)
Duppers This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bayard
(24,145 posts)Wait two weeks, then charge trump.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(115,684 posts)world wide wally
(21,832 posts)thecrow
(5,520 posts)I hear hes got it in the bank. Grifted from his treasonous minions.
Taxpayers should not have to pay for this mess. Strip him of his campaign funds.