Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabra

(30,406 posts)
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 12:19 PM Dec 2020

Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds Biden's win, rejects Trump lawsuit

Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

MADISON - The state Supreme Court upheld Democrat Joe Biden's Wisconsin win Monday, handing President Donald Trump a defeat less than an hour before the Electoral College was to meet.

The 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of dozens of losses for the president across the country as Republicans pursue last-gasp efforts to give Trump a second term.

Read more: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/14/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-joe-bidens-win/6529642002/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds Biden's win, rejects Trump lawsuit (Original Post) sabra Dec 2020 OP
I have never been grateful for a former Walker staffer, but thank you Brian Hegedorn and the 3 33taw Dec 2020 #1
That 3 sitting Justices sided with the monster is disturbing randr Dec 2020 #2
Its important to read the suit or article ScratchCat Dec 2020 #5
Ahh, that is good to know. n/t Chemisse Dec 2020 #13
Should have been unanimous... Chicago1980 Dec 2020 #3
yep...scary it was close... dhill926 Dec 2020 #11
Good job Wisconsin! FakeNoose Dec 2020 #4
LOVE THIS! bluestarone Dec 2020 #6
And the losses keep on coming Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2020 #7
Yay!!!!! Talitha Dec 2020 #8
I don't know what is sweeter: Initech Dec 2020 #9
Forward Wisconsin riversedge Dec 2020 #10
4-3. there are 3 judges that don't believe in democracy. samsingh Dec 2020 #12
There was a reason. It's in the article. n/t Chemisse Dec 2020 #14
there reasoning is crap and would be reversed if a Democratic Candidate was involved samsingh Dec 2020 #15

33taw

(2,961 posts)
1. I have never been grateful for a former Walker staffer, but thank you Brian Hegedorn and the 3
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 12:28 PM
Dec 2020

liberal justices.

ScratchCat

(2,510 posts)
5. Its important to read the suit or article
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 12:55 PM
Dec 2020

The three dissenting justices did no over their opinion that having a clerk fill in missing addresses was against State law. That is the only area they dissented.

Chicago1980

(1,968 posts)
3. Should have been unanimous...
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 12:29 PM
Dec 2020

"In dissent were Roggensack and Justices Rebecca Bradley and Annette Ziegler. (The Bradleys are not related.)"

Shame on them.....

Initech

(102,865 posts)
9. I don't know what is sweeter:
Mon Dec 14, 2020, 02:14 PM
Dec 2020

Watching Trump lose the election or watching Trump losing the election 56 times in a row?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Wisconsin Supreme Court u...