HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Wisconsin Supreme Court u...

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 01:19 PM

Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds Biden's win, rejects Trump lawsuit

Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

MADISON - The state Supreme Court upheld Democrat Joe Biden's Wisconsin win Monday, handing President Donald Trump a defeat less than an hour before the Electoral College was to meet.

The 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of dozens of losses for the president across the country as Republicans pursue last-gasp efforts to give Trump a second term.

Read more: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/14/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-joe-bidens-win/6529642002/

15 replies, 1785 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
Reply Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds Biden's win, rejects Trump lawsuit (Original post)
sabra Dec 2020 OP
33taw Dec 2020 #1
randr Dec 2020 #2
ScratchCat Dec 2020 #5
Chemisse Dec 2020 #13
Chicago1980 Dec 2020 #3
dhill926 Dec 2020 #11
FakeNoose Dec 2020 #4
bluestarone Dec 2020 #6
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 2020 #7
Talitha Dec 2020 #8
Initech Dec 2020 #9
riversedge Dec 2020 #10
samsingh Dec 2020 #12
Chemisse Dec 2020 #14
samsingh Dec 2020 #15

Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 01:28 PM

1. I have never been grateful for a former Walker staffer, but thank you Brian Hegedorn and the 3

liberal justices.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 01:28 PM

2. That 3 sitting Justices sided with the monster is disturbing

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randr (Reply #2)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 01:55 PM

5. Its important to read the suit or article

The three dissenting justices did no over their opinion that having a clerk fill in missing addresses was against State law. That is the only area they dissented.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ScratchCat (Reply #5)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 07:16 PM

13. Ahh, that is good to know. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 01:29 PM

3. Should have been unanimous...

"In dissent were Roggensack and Justices Rebecca Bradley and Annette Ziegler. (The Bradleys are not related.)"

Shame on them.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Chicago1980 (Reply #3)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 04:59 PM

11. yep...scary it was close...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 01:42 PM

4. Good job Wisconsin!




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FakeNoose (Reply #4)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 01:59 PM

6. LOVE THIS!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 02:05 PM

7. And the losses keep on coming

Guess Trump is tired of winning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 02:06 PM

8. Yay!!!!!

I'm glad they waited till just before the EC vote.
It made Dumpy sweat more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 03:14 PM

9. I don't know what is sweeter:

Watching Trump lose the election or watching Trump losing the election 56 times in a row?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 04:29 PM

10. Forward Wisconsin

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sabra (Original post)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 05:35 PM

12. 4-3. there are 3 judges that don't believe in democracy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to samsingh (Reply #12)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 07:18 PM

14. There was a reason. It's in the article. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Chemisse (Reply #14)

Mon Dec 14, 2020, 08:45 PM

15. there reasoning is crap and would be reversed if a Democratic Candidate was involved

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread