Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,018 posts)
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 05:47 PM Oct 2012

Quebec nuclear reactor shutdown will cost $1.8 billion

Source: CBC

Quebec's only nuclear power plant will shut down on Dec. 28, Hydro-Québec announced Wednesday, but the process of dismantling it will take 50 years and cost $1.8 billion.

The official statement confirms what the new Parti Québécois government has been saying for weeks: that the province won't pay to refurbish the Gentilly-2 reactor and instead will have it decommissioned.

Hydro-Québec's most recent economic analysis, made public on Wednesday, recommends against spending the billions of dollars that would be required to rebuild the reactor to allow it to continue operating.

The Crown corporation says it now estimates the refurbishment would cost $4.3 billion, up from the $2 billion that the previous Liberal government had budgeted.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/10/03/montreal-gentilly-2-shutdown-cost-hydro-quebec.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quebec nuclear reactor shutdown will cost $1.8 billion (Original Post) alp227 Oct 2012 OP
But rebuilding the damn thing will cost $4.3 billion, and the old plant would still need to be torn leveymg Oct 2012 #1
Not to mention the eternity of costs to protect the planet against the spent fuel on point Oct 2012 #2
They have to pay to let it cool down sulphurdunn Oct 2012 #3
just say no to nuke plants,. Civilization2 Oct 2012 #4
Whinging bastards rootProbiscus Oct 2012 #5
What is "whinging"? DavidL Oct 2012 #6
Oi, Yank... C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Oct 2012 #7
Not a good start at making new friends. nt Xipe Totec Oct 2012 #8
Is that what you have to add to the discussion? nm rhett o rick Oct 2012 #10
and each US plant is insured for a whopping (sarcasm) $350 million---US taxpayers pay the rest if wordpix Oct 2012 #9

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
1. But rebuilding the damn thing will cost $4.3 billion, and the old plant would still need to be torn
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 06:04 PM
Oct 2012

down, as will be the new one, eventually. With decommission costs running almost as much as building new ones, nuclear doesn't look like a bargain, and the construction and operating estimates often omit the high cost of decommissioning these things.

No thank you.

on point

(2,506 posts)
2. Not to mention the eternity of costs to protect the planet against the spent fuel
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 06:22 PM
Oct 2012

They NEVER include the on going costs of dealing with the spent fuel, for which there is no good answer and which can stretch into THOUSANDS of years!!

Economic net net nuclear power is a loss!!

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
3. They have to pay to let it cool down
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 06:25 PM
Oct 2012

for 40 years before they can even begin taking it apart over the next 10 and they have a cost estimate of $1.8 billion?

 

Civilization2

(649 posts)
4. just say no to nuke plants,.
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 06:31 PM
Oct 2012

the costs are pushed onto the 99% while the few run off with a sht load of cash for "developing" the plants,. it is a money pit and a terrible theft from the many for the enrichment of the few.

rootProbiscus

(38 posts)
5. Whinging bastards
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 06:45 PM
Oct 2012

They have successfully decommissioned two nuclear plants already - Chernobyl and Fukushima
Only another 500 to go

C_eh_N_eh_D_eh

(2,204 posts)
7. Oi, Yank...
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 07:03 PM
Oct 2012

From dictionary.com:

whinge
? hwinj, winj
verb (used without object), whinged, whing·ing. British and Australian Informal .
to complain; whine.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
9. and each US plant is insured for a whopping (sarcasm) $350 million---US taxpayers pay the rest if
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 07:27 PM
Oct 2012

anything goes wrong.

NO to NUKES!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Quebec nuclear reactor sh...