Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ChiTownDenny

(747 posts)
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 01:46 PM Jul 2020

SCOTUS Allows FL Ex-Felon Voter Restrictions Struck Down By Judge To Be Reinstated

Source: TPM

Florida’s restrictions on ex-felon voting will likely remain in place at least for August’s primary, after the Supreme Court on Thursday refused to remove a hold on a trial judge’s ruling that those restrictions are unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court’s action in the case, where the voting rights of hundreds of thousands ex-felons could be at stake in the swing state, is the latest example of the conservative majority siding with restrictive laws.

Though the Florida case is not technically linked to the pandemic, in several other recent disputes where voter access in the outbreak was in play, the Supreme Court has consistently sided with keeping in place the more restrictive voter regimes.

Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/supreme-court-florida-ex-felons-voter-restrictaions



The case involves a law Florida Republicans passed in 2019, after the state’s voters in 2018 approved a constitutional amendment giving certain ex-felons the right to vote. The 2019 law requires that those ex-felons pay back all remaining court fees before they regain the franchise. The law’s challengers say that the mandate amounts to an unconstitutional poll tax.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS Allows FL Ex-Felon Voter Restrictions Struck Down By Judge To Be Reinstated (Original Post) ChiTownDenny Jul 2020 OP
This is SO FRUSTRATING! Desert grandma Jul 2020 #1
It's not just fines. It's also restitution. Jose Garcia Jul 2020 #3
The repub legislature could just say that was a work around, and did not meet the standard not_the_one Jul 2020 #10
Judges can commute those fines to community Phoenix61 Jul 2020 #2
Roberts made up for his decisions... atreides1 Jul 2020 #4
Roberts has a thing for eliminating voting rights BumRushDaShow Jul 2020 #7
64.5% of Florida voters voted to have these rights restored EleanorR Jul 2020 #5
this is fucked up-- more voting suppression from the rightwing LymphocyteLover Jul 2020 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author NoRWNJ Jul 2020 #8
This would be a good application of Bloomberg's offer to help Dems win. Pay em all off. JudyM Jul 2020 #9
+1 appalachiablue Jul 2020 #12
Why don't any articles say what the vote was? Polybius Jul 2020 #11
From the OP article: sl8 Jul 2020 #13
Then they shouldn't have to pay taxes MissMillie Jul 2020 #14

Desert grandma

(1,053 posts)
1. This is SO FRUSTRATING!
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 01:49 PM
Jul 2020

Some Democratic billionaires need to get together and pay these fines to allow these Floridians to vote!

 

not_the_one

(2,227 posts)
10. The repub legislature could just say that was a work around, and did not meet the standard
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 07:25 PM
Jul 2020

of requiring the felon to pay the fine, or restitution.

And they would do just that. And appeal.

Phoenix61

(17,594 posts)
2. Judges can commute those fines to community
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 01:53 PM
Jul 2020

service. The really big issue is finding the fine. They are sold to collection agencies who can then resell them over and over and over. Trying to trace one that is 10 years old becomes impossible. That was the biggest gripe. It’s not just a poll tax it’s a poll tax it’s next to possible to find so how can you possibly pay it.

atreides1

(16,359 posts)
4. Roberts made up for his decisions...
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 03:35 PM
Jul 2020

...about Trumps taxes!

So much for the court not being political!!!!

BumRushDaShow

(141,760 posts)
7. Roberts has a thing for eliminating voting rights
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 04:41 PM
Jul 2020

He did it with the Wisconsin absentee ballot extension case during the height of the pandemic in April and he did his coup de grace with the VRA ruling in 2013.

EleanorR

(2,434 posts)
5. 64.5% of Florida voters voted to have these rights restored
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 03:54 PM
Jul 2020

Lets hope this judicial activism negating their votes pisses them off and brings them out to vote in November.

Response to LymphocyteLover (Reply #6)

JudyM

(29,517 posts)
9. This would be a good application of Bloomberg's offer to help Dems win. Pay em all off.
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 05:50 PM
Jul 2020

... or just those with Dem voting records

Polybius

(17,728 posts)
11. Why don't any articles say what the vote was?
Thu Jul 16, 2020, 11:12 PM
Jul 2020

This article says three liberals descended, but doesn't even say which three except that one is Sotomayor. That means one liberal sided with the majority. Who? Kagan? Breyer? Certainly not RGB.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-deals-blow-to-felons-in-florida-seeking-to-regain-the-right-to-vote/2020/07/16/2ede827c-c5dd-11ea-a99f-3bbdffb1af38_story.html

sl8

(16,245 posts)
13. From the OP article:
Fri Jul 17, 2020, 04:21 AM
Jul 2020

Last edited Fri Jul 17, 2020, 06:09 AM - Edit history (2)


[...]
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan joined Sotomayor’s dissent, but it’s possible that another justice may have dissented privately.
[...]



Also, the article includes a copy of the dissent, which identifies the three justices.


Regarding the actual vote, they don't publicly announce that for orders like this. Keep in mind that this wasn't a case they heard argued. This was the court declining a request to vacate a stay from a lower court. in an unsigned order.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»SCOTUS Allows FL Ex-Felon...