HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Justices ask for more bri...

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 02:50 PM

Justices ask for more briefing in Trump tax-returns cases

Source: SCOTUS blog

This morning the Supreme Court issued orders from the justices’ private conference last week. The justices did not act on two cases that have been repeatedly relisted in recent weeks, a death-penalty case from Texas and the federal government’s challenge to one of California’s “sanctuary state” laws, which prohibit state and local law-enforcement officials from cooperating with federal immigration officials. The most noteworthy order came instead in a set of cases scheduled for argument in the justices’ upcoming argument session and could potentially derail congressional efforts to obtain President Donald Trump’s financial records.

The justices have scheduled oral argument for May 12 in a trio of cases involving efforts by the U.S. House of Representatives and a Manhattan district attorney to obtain Trump’s financial records from his long-time accountant and his lenders. In the two cases involving Congress, which are consolidated for one hour of argument, the question is whether the committees can subpoena Trump’s records, while in the New York case the question is whether a state grand-jury subpoena can be enforced while the president is in office.

Today the justices asked the parties to the congressional-subpoena cases and the federal government, which filed a “friend of the court” brief supporting Trump, to file supplemental briefs addressing whether the political-question doctrine applies to the cases – that is, whether courts should stay out of the fight over the subpoenas because it is fundamentally a political dispute between the branches of government. If the justices were to conclude that the doctrine applies, they could dismiss the cases without ruling on the merits of the dispute – which might be a particularly appealing outcome for some justices in the lead-up to the presidential election. Such a decision could have mixed results for Trump: Without a ruling in his favor, he might not be able to block the accountant or lenders from turning over the records, but on the other hand Congress would not be able to enforce a subpoena if the companies holding the records opted not to comply.

The justices will meet again for their next conference on Friday, May 1. We expect orders from that conference on Monday, May 4, at 9:30 a.m. EDT.

Read more: https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/04/justices-ask-for-more-briefing-in-trump-tax-returns-cases/#more-293381

9 replies, 1789 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread

Response to Calista241 (Original post)

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 02:54 PM

1. This sounds merely like a delay, likely a long delay, masterminded by the conservatives on the SC.

Yeah, they will delay as long as possible and even then, if forced, will take a pass to avoid any ruling before the election.

If so, we lose, the SC conservatives and Trump win. Sad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Calista241 (Original post)

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 03:23 PM

2. More briefing? Wouldn't NOW be a good time to know why Dump is acting so suspiciously?

Who the F does he owe money to, and where are his allegiances? Because he certainly doesn't seem to have the American Peoples' best interest at heart!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flibbitygiblets (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 03:38 PM

4. Actually, it's too late for 55,000 dead - but it could help a few more stragglers get the picture...

before November 3rd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flibbitygiblets (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 04:44 PM

5. Who does Trump owe money to?

I would suspect that Trump owes money (and lots of money) to:

1. Russian banks

2. Chinese banks

3. The House of Saud

4. Israeli business partners (silent partners)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SkatmanRoth (Reply #5)

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 06:38 PM

8. Forgot one. #5 Deutsche Bank and Trump: $2 Billion in Loans (NYT)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mpcamb (Reply #8)

Tue Apr 28, 2020, 09:33 AM

9. Money laundering for Putin?

nt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Calista241 (Original post)

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 03:29 PM

3. The laws were written to prevent what happened after the Tea Pot Dome

and after what Nixon did and his shit.............by political parties from both sides...........this is going to be interesting to say the least.................

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Calista241 (Original post)

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 05:14 PM

6. Here's your briefing. A hundred year old law says Congress can access tax returns.

Any questions?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Calista241 (Original post)

Mon Apr 27, 2020, 05:19 PM

7. Kickin'

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread