Trump says he won't comply with key transparency measures in the coronavirus stimulus bill
Source: VOX
The administration says it wont provide documentation for audits into $500 billion in corporate bailout funds.
By Anya van [email protected] Mar 28, 2020, 11:41am EDT
President Donald Trump said on Friday that he will not adhere to a portion of the $2 trillion coronavirus stimulus bill that would authorize an inspector general to oversee how $500 billion in business loans will be spent.
In a statement released early Friday evening, Trump announced that he had signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security or CARES Act, a relief package aimed at mitigating some of the economic fallout caused by efforts to allay the spread of Covid-19.
That bill also establishes a Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery (SIGPR) within the Treasury Department to audit and investigate half a trillion dollars in loans for large businesses. In his signing statement, Trump said that this provision raises constitutional concerns, adding that his administration would not comply with such an officials request for documents.
I do not understand, and my Administration will not treat, this provision as permitting the SIGPR to issue reports to the Congress without the presidential supervision required by the Take Care Clause, part of Article II Section 3 of the Constitution that states a sitting president shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed. This seems to suggest the administration believes it is the presidents duty and not that of an inspector general to ensure the funds are distributed as the law intends.
Read more: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/3/28/21197995/coronavirus-stimulus-trump-inspector-general-wont-comply?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=vox.social&utm_content=voxdotcom&fbclid=IwAR0BH5tnKELWW055w5C0fAcdHLnQUxcZRt45NTwxzLbpff0JkzskzP4vqCA
Anyone surprised?
Can you say Kleptocracy Trump Style?
James48
(4,428 posts)Doesnt want anybody to know who he is handing out money to, and what kickbacks he is asking for it.
Impeach the bastard in this one alone.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,966 posts)onetexan
(13,024 posts)rockfordfile
(8,699 posts)abqtommy
(14,118 posts)their death spiral continues and is accelerating. It's the duty of all Democrats and thinking people to
make sure this is so and plays out to the end as quickly as possible.
agingdem
(7,805 posts)aren't stupid ... pretty sure they anticipated this...
Thekaspervote
(32,715 posts)I just cant imagine the legal team for the Dems on this bill would have possibly overlooked this. Madam speaker and Schumer...not easily hoodwinked
True Blue American
(17,981 posts)For those who missed it rerun at 12. Doctor Fauci on,too.
Jake asked Nancy about the signing. She answered loud and clear!
SergeStorms
(19,187 posts)Trump to adhere to any rules or laws he doesn't like? He never has, but everyone thought he'd start now? He's gotten away with more things that would have put any other president out on the street looking for work, but with the help of his loyal asskissers in Congress, and the butt-lickers he's installed in every key Cabinet post, he'll continue to back the Trump Trucking Company 18 wheeler right up to the Treasury's loading dock for pallets of the taxpayers money.
Trump, follow laws and rules? HA! That's for chumps and losers.
tikka
(762 posts)Rube Icon
(78 posts)Picking and choosing which laws to obey. Of course, given Trump's girth, Mega-BUFFET President might be more apt.
ffr
(22,665 posts)Tens of thousands of Americans are going to die and all he can think of is looting the U.S. Treasury.
Prison is too good for this criminal.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)The IG conducts a review of the financial transactions and makes a detailed report to Congress. The IG has no say in the spending decisions. This IG is no different than all of the other IG's operating in the government. If this goes to court and they rule in favor of Trump it would have consequences up and down the government agencies that have an IG function.
Thekaspervote
(32,715 posts)DallasNE
(7,402 posts)That is the amount the President can spend in the various agencies of the government. Major agencies have an IG imbedded that can be called upon to investigate compliance with the will of the Congress. Generally the threat of an investigation is enough for the executive to toe the line. It is about the only transparency and accountability feature we have. Now Trump wants to end that. What is sure to follow is corruption on a massive scale should Trump be granted the power edit the IG report before it is made public. It is a power grab, plain and simple.
rickford66
(5,522 posts)CousinIT
(9,225 posts)If it's Trump and the Senate, they may as well not bother because whoever it they choose will do more to stonewall and hide info than to work towards transparency and sharing w/ Congress.
BumRushDaShow
(128,525 posts)But there are also other things being set up -
The bill would also set up several layers of independent oversight for the rollout of more than $2 trillion in emergency spending. First, the bill creates a new inspector general post inside the Treasury Department. The president would appoint and the Senate would confirm a Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery. This IG would oversee a $500 billion Exchange Stabilization Fund. Oversight of this particular fund, which Treasury will use to provide some relief to the airline and other industries, was a sticking point for senators during legislative negotiations earlier this week.
The bill would also stand up a Pandemic Response Accountability Committee made up of agency inspectors general who would conduct audits and investigate claims of fraud, waste and abuse of coronavirus spending. The bill would give the committee an $80 million budget, and would ensure IGs have access to documents and testimony from agency officials and private-sector recipients of funding. It would also require the committee to post its findings on Oversight.gov.
Members of the committee would include IGs from several agencies involved in coronavirus response. Michael Horowitz, the Justice Departments inspector general and chair of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, would consult with House and Senate leadership to name the executive director of the committee. I am very pleased that the bill includes important provisions to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used effectively and efficiently, House Oversight and Reform Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) said in a statement Thursday.
The Government Accountability Office would receive an additional $20 million to audit agency coronavirus spending, and would receive authority to oversee and investigate private entities that receive funding. GAO wouldnt be the only legislative watchdog. The bill would also stand up a five-member Congressional Oversight Commission that would oversee spending from the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve.
https://federalnewsnetwork.com/legislation/2020/03/what-the-2t-coronavirus-stimulus-means-for-federal-employees-retirees-and-contractors/
(bolding mine)
But there will be a Congressional oversight function as well - where a (what I assume will be) bicameral oversight panel set up with members of Congress to oversee and monitor what is going on. Katie Porter (D-CA) was on MSNBC's Last Word (this past Friday) and mentioned wanting to be part of that panel. She is currently a member of the House Oversight Committee (Chaired by Carolyn Maloney) -
crickets
(25,952 posts)True Blue American
(17,981 posts)Because Nancy made it clear this morning how companies award big bonuses and stock buy backs.
That is stopped in the bill, too.
Igel
(35,282 posts)It's the usual claim that Congress is overreaching and the counterclaim that anything Congress passes is Constitutional.
As though no law has ever been struck down as unconstitutional.
oasis
(49,335 posts)Guess again mofo.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)badhair77
(4,210 posts)to put them wherever cash is kept. Add his audacity in ignoring laws and doing what he wants, then tying the whole thing up in the courts. Seriously, this cant go on. At some point the people have to rise up.
lark
(23,065 posts)He will fill up his personal coffers emptied by his mis-management and stupid decisions, he will dump money on hackers, manipulate the states voter database and/or hack the election results & produce fake materials about Biden to try to hide what he's doing behind the curtain, he will fluff up Bernie, might even give him a huge contribution through a back door, Sinclair, Faux Snooze, anyone that will give him a huge bribe gets money and there will be zero repayment. Our economy will talk and he will have then done what the rw has been trying to do since day 1, steal all the workers funds and cut social security, medicare and medicaid to the bone.
machoneman
(3,999 posts)-by lawsuit, by a vote of no confidence in Mnuchin (acted in bad faith), by appealing a freeze to district courts and more.
Keep in mind too that another round (at least one more) will be required to get us back on an even keel. Pelosi and Schumer can easily galvinize our troops to refuse any and all parts of this next round unless a.) Mnuchin steps down b.) Treasury complies with the already passed rules (who, what, where, when) and 'proves' where the cash went. c.) we not the Senate Republiscums write the nect bill, the bill which ONLY helps people with zero $ for corporations, wealthy folks and Trump's family in particular.
dreamland
(964 posts)Will the DEMs look the other way knowing that most of this money will help the crisis even if shithead dipface will be profiting as well? Von Clownstick's crumbs from a stimulus cake. If it didn't benefit him in any way, he wouldn't have signed it. Remember he refused the congressional aid in Feb. That signing photo is proof of GOP kleptocracy.
Turbineguy
(37,295 posts)two years from now he'll be complaining about the food they serve in prison.
Harker
(13,985 posts)a Sharpie line item veto?
I think not.