HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » White supremacists are en...

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 01:42 PM

White supremacists are encouraging members to infect Jews with coronavirus: FBI

Source: ABC News via Rawstory



The FBI is warning that white supremacists have started encouraging their followers to contract COVID-19 and then intentionally spread it to police officers and Jews.

ABC News reports that the FBI’s New York office sent out an alert recently that warned neo-Nazi groups are pushing members to spread the virus though “bodily fluids and personal interactions” to their perceived enemies.

“The FBI alert, which went out on Thursday, told local police agencies that extremists want their followers to try to use spray bottles to spread bodily fluids to cops on the street,” ABC News reports. “The extremists are also directing followers to spread the disease to Jews by going “any place they may be congregated, to include markets, political offices, businesses and places of worship.”

Michael Masters, the head of Secure Communities Network that coordinates security for synagogues, tells ABC News that neo-Nazis have been claiming that Jews are responsible for the spread of the virus in the United States.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/2020/03/white-supremacists-are-encouraging-members-to-infect-jews-with-coronavirus-fbi/



This is what happens when you have a fascist in the white house.

60 replies, 2182 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 60 replies Author Time Post
Reply White supremacists are encouraging members to infect Jews with coronavirus: FBI (Original post)
George II Mar 23 OP
marble falls Mar 23 #1
BGBD Mar 23 #20
marble falls Mar 23 #21
ck4829 Mar 23 #2
kysrsoze Mar 23 #3
Progressive Jones Mar 23 #4
47of74 Mar 23 #5
sdfernando Mar 23 #10
sarisataka Mar 23 #14
marble falls Mar 23 #24
sarisataka Mar 23 #30
marble falls Mar 23 #34
sarisataka Mar 23 #36
marble falls Mar 23 #39
sarisataka Mar 23 #42
marble falls Mar 23 #44
sarisataka Mar 24 #49
marble falls Mar 24 #54
sarisataka Mar 24 #55
Marcuse Mar 23 #25
sarisataka Mar 23 #31
marble falls Mar 23 #37
sarisataka Mar 23 #41
SpankMe Mar 23 #6
Jirel Mar 23 #7
bluescribbler Mar 23 #8
AllaN01Bear Mar 23 #9
IronLionZion Mar 23 #11
JudyM Mar 26 #60
dhill926 Mar 23 #12
BlueIdaho Mar 23 #13
sandensea Mar 23 #40
BlueIdaho Mar 24 #46
sandensea Mar 24 #47
BlueIdaho Mar 24 #48
sandensea Mar 24 #50
Behind the Aegis Mar 23 #15
Progressive Jones Mar 23 #17
Behind the Aegis Mar 23 #18
Progressive Jones Mar 23 #28
Behind the Aegis Mar 24 #45
Progressive Jones Mar 24 #51
Behind the Aegis Mar 24 #52
Withywindle Mar 24 #53
Progressive Jones Mar 24 #56
marble falls Mar 23 #22
Progressive Jones Mar 23 #27
marble falls Mar 23 #29
Progressive Jones Mar 23 #32
keithbvadu2 Mar 23 #16
Firestorm49 Mar 23 #19
marble falls Mar 23 #23
rockfordfile Mar 23 #26
DashOneBravo Mar 23 #33
Initech Mar 23 #38
DashOneBravo Mar 26 #59
Initech Mar 23 #35
captain jack Mar 23 #43
BigDemVoter Mar 24 #57
ck4829 Mar 26 #58

Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 01:47 PM

1. Ignorant jerks. Why do they think they'd survive and someone else wouldn't? ...

What makes these Nazis think they'll find medical treatment for themselves when most of them don't seem able to find a Dentist?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #1)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 05:58 PM

20. I'm sure

it has something to do with them being ubermensches.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BGBD (Reply #20)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 06:03 PM

21. Don't you mean gooberschleppers?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 01:49 PM

2. Should go without saying: Not Antifa, not Muslims, not immigrants, not Syrian refugees

Why can't these white supremacists assimilate into American society?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 01:54 PM

3. I hope they infect their own families and friends instead. Screw the nazis.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 01:58 PM

4. If law enforcement knows of these plans,

then law enforcement knows who the leadership is.
Why won't law enforcement "remove" the leadership?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Progressive Jones (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 02:03 PM

5. too many Klansmen in the departments

They sympathize with these fuck sticks.

I personally think we should have been harder on the south after the Civil War. I think we would have prevented a lot of problems if we had given them more than a slap on the wrist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 47of74 (Reply #5)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 02:34 PM

10. It most definitely would have been different if Lincoln was not assassinated

Johnson was a Democrat (back when the DEMS were more like today's REPS). He wanted quick re-integration of the southern states with basically no protection for former slaves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sdfernando (Reply #10)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 03:52 PM

14. How would it have been different

If Lincoln had lived?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #14)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 06:14 PM

24. You mean other than than Lincoln wouldn't have vetoed rights to released slaves, among other things?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #24)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:48 PM

30. Maybe, or maybe not

Lincoln's plans for reconstruction were far more lenient than Johnson's. Although Lincoln did acknowledge that the freed slaves would have to be accepted as a part of the political landscape he did approve the first draft of Louisiana's new constitution that did not blacks the right to vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #30)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:59 PM

34. I think I may have misunderstood you. To be clear: in the immediate aftermath of the civil war ...

the lives of freed slaves would have been better if Lincoln not been murdered, that Johnson made things worse. Right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #34)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 10:07 PM

36. I think had Lincoln lived it would have been better for all parties

I think black civil rights would still have moved slowly but overall quality of life and integration may have turned out much better. I do not believe Lincoln would have completely turned his back on the plight of the former slaves.

Johnson was definitely worse than Lincoln would have been. He tried to create a middle ground between Lincoln's lenient plans and the severe punishment road the radical Republicans imposed. His lack of political savvy and negotiating skills resulted in utter failure and created a situation that allowed persecution and the Klan to flourish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #36)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 10:17 PM

39. Thats my sense of the history of it too. I'd argue though, that after Reconstruction ...

Regardless of whether it was Lincoln or Johnson (both would have been out of power) after ten years of the Reconstruction, everything would have turned to shit for Black Americans all across the US but especially in the South anyways.

What magic thing could have stopped what happened to Black Americans in three more years of Lincoln.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #39)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 10:35 PM

42. Just an opinion

which has not much to base it on, since Lincoln was killed, is that his plan would have cause less resentment among the southern population.

They would still have been upset over the loss of slavery (although towards the end the Confederate government even considered freeing an amount of slaves) and accepting blacks as (near) equals would have been a bitter pill to swallow.

It is my belief that the atmosphere that allowed the KKK to flourish would not have been present. I do not doubt that there would have been some organization formed to terrorize blacks 'back into their place' but that such a group would not have been supported so heavily. The average person on the street would feel he had to much to lose if the Yankees came down to take over because of the actions of radicals. The way reconstruction occurred, the average person had nothing to lose by supporting the Klan.

In short, under a Lincoln led reconstruction black people would still have been fucked but not as hard. Perhaps the civil rights movement of the 60's would have happened several decades earlier. The suffrage movement and a civil rights movement may have found common ground in a less toxic environment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #42)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 11:43 PM

44. Revisionist history, The proximate cause of the war was slavery. The Federal government ...

wanted it stopped and the traitors in the South reveled. Federal power and State's Rights was incidntal. If the Federal Govt hadn't had an issue - SLAVERY - there was no need to fight. The issue was the South wasn't going to give slavery because the mistakenly thought it was their right.

Seriously, where did you learn "the war was a fight ove states rights".

Funny, you argued somewhere that Lincoln had intention of curtailing Black American Rights to salve the South - but states rights was the cause of huge blood shed. Where did you read about that stuff?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #44)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 01:26 AM

49. If you are going to attribute a quote to me

I.e. "the war was a fight ove states rights" you should look to see if I actually said those words. I did not.

I was stating Lincoln's view of the war which derive from his own words in a letter published April 22, 1862 which reads in part:
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. 


Many abolitionists saw the war as a chance to destroy slavery but Lincoln was not one of them. His goal was to preserve the United States. To say he was leading an antislavery crusade is a pleasant fiction, but it is s fiction.

I did not argue it was his intention to curtail the rights of the freed slaves but stated the was my opinion. I based that opinion on his writings on his views of his duty as President to preserve the Union at all cost, one example above, and his willingness to accept a constitution of a southern state for readmission to the Union that prohibited slavery without granting full rights to the freed slaves.

If you know of writing by Lincoln indicating a goal of freeing all slaves and granting full rights to them after the war, please direct me to them. I would be most interested in reading his thoughts on the subject.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #49)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 10:29 AM

54. Yeah, its called the Emancipation Proclamation. Do you have any indication in documentation ...

this wasn't going to be the law of the land? I'm thinking the war ended before Lincoln was shot and all the slaves were freed is a pretty good indication "Lincoln freed the slaves."

What do you think? I wasn't quoting you I paraphrasing you: you said that the war was not about slavery it was about the withdrawing from the Union over disagreements over slavery. If that isn't states rights vs Federal authority what was it??????

The issue was slavery. The Feds against it, the traitorous South for it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #54)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 11:43 AM

55. "Lincoln freed the slaves"

Would be called by mythbusters 'mostly true'. As I pointed out, the Emancipation Proclamation only applied to areas under control of the Confederacy. Two states still had slavery after the Civil War, Delaware and Kentucky until the passage of the 13th Amendment.

The Emancipation Proclamation was not (by itself) going to be the law of the land because the President cannot change the Constitution by proclamation. That is why the 13th Amendment (strongly supported by Lincoln) was needed, to eliminate slavery Constitutionally.

The issues of states rights and slavery were inseparable issues at that time. Lincoln personally opposed slavery, quite vehemently, his primary reason for the war was the Union. I am not claiming everyone held this viewpoint. Many northerners did see the war as being about slavery.

You may find this an interesting read- https://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/emancipation-proclamation

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #14)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 06:26 PM

25. Not very. Republicans soon colluded with Democrats, resulting in a century of Jim Crow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Marcuse (Reply #25)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:51 PM

31. It is quite possible Lincoln would have

sacrificed the rights of blacks in order to quickly rebuild the country. He was willing to tolerate slavery continuing if it would have prevented the war.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #31)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 10:11 PM

37. Sacrifice the rights of a people we fought a bloody war with traitors for five years that took ...

655,000 dead? And he was going to take away the rights that were fought for so long and bloodily to cozy up the Southern traitor's in their abject loss???

Where are you getting your history?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #37)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 10:23 PM

41. You are making the common mistake

believing that Lincoln fought to free the slaves. Although he was opposed to slavery, he fought the war to preserve the Union. The issue of slavery was secondary.

Note the wording of the Emancipation Proclamation:
all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free

Slaves within states that did not secede or in areas under control of Union forces were not affected by this proclamation.

Lincoln's plan to readmit southern states, the Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction, granted pardon to all southerners except political leaders. To accept the amnesty Lincoln only required 10% of registered voters of a southern state to take an oath of loyalty.

Yes, IMO Lincoln would have sacrificed some civil rights for blacks if the result was a rapid reconstruction.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 02:05 PM

6. If liberals were threatening to infect a particular group in this manner...

...the FBI would already have made arrests and filed charges for biological terrorism.

But, they're taking a 'wait-and-see' and 'we-don't-have-enough-data-yet' approach with white supremacists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 02:06 PM

7. We can only hope...

that they contract it and give it TO EACH OTHER and their families, and wipe themselves out in the process.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 02:07 PM

8. "Very fine people on both sides"

IQ45 strikes again by providing cover for these creeps.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 02:17 PM

9. dunkoffs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 02:42 PM

11. Time to round up Nazis and quarantine them in internment camps

just like America did to Japanese-Americans during WW2.

or is it? Hmm...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IronLionZion (Reply #11)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 09:10 PM

60. Delicious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 03:30 PM

12. conspiracy to commit murder perhaps....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 03:44 PM

13. Are they assuming their Aryan blood will protect them?

cuz that just ain’t gonna happen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueIdaho (Reply #13)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 10:22 PM

40. Probably.

White, pro-Apartheid South Africans thought the same of AIDS.

One of the most disturbing revelations that emerged from Mandela's Truth and Reconciliation Commission, you may recall, was that South African Security deliberately infected black prostitutes with HIV - trying (and successfully so) to spread it in the black comunity.

They were so convinced it only killed Africans, that they called it the "Black bomb."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sandensea (Reply #40)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 12:35 AM

46. Thanks for the reminder!

I mean that seriously... I had forgotten their insanity - same as it ever was...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueIdaho (Reply #46)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 12:59 AM

47. Sure.

While we're on the subject, wasn't Trump on the pro-Apartheid camp in the 1980s?

Former British PM David Cameron famously was (photos emerged of his ecstatically holding "Hang Mandela" signs as a student at the time).

I seem to remember that Trump was - but am not sure (Reagan certainly was).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sandensea (Reply #47)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 01:17 AM

48. Tough to know...

He has always held a fistful of convenient contradictory views. No doubt his racism was and is a well known fact. But was he pro-apartheid like Reagan and Thatcher? It wouldn’t surprise me...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueIdaho (Reply #48)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 01:51 AM

50. "A fistful of convenient contradictory views"

Excellent description for Duplicitous Don.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 03:59 PM

15. Oh the fucking irony!

"neo-Nazis have been claiming that Jews are responsible for the spread of the virus in the United States." and yet, now they are trying to destroy us with it?!



Of course, as long as they stick to trying to kill Jews, most won't notice, much less care; it will be more about making political statements than actual concern for the Jewish people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Behind the Aegis (Reply #15)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 04:55 PM

17. I think the second part of your comment paints with way too wide of a brush. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Progressive Jones (Reply #17)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 05:28 PM

18. Think what you'd like; I think the brush is about that wide.

Thanks for 'splaining it though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Behind the Aegis (Reply #18)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:19 PM

28. Nice passive aggressive shitting on an ally. Thanks for 'splainin it all to me. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Progressive Jones (Reply #28)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 12:06 AM

45. Speaking of passive aggressive...

...the ole, "how dare you! I am an ally!" Whatever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Behind the Aegis (Reply #45)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 02:20 AM

51. You're welcome. My Jewish partner says "Hi". nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Progressive Jones (Reply #51)


Response to Progressive Jones (Reply #28)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 03:27 AM

53. Real allies stand up for the group they're allying with

not claiming "ally" status to shut them down.

I try to be an ally for many groups I'm not a part of. A big part of that is sitting still and listening when someone of that group tells you that you have got something wrong. Jews know more about anti-Semitism than non-Jews. (And no of course they're not a monolith, but if you are not Jewish, please, just...think. Consider it.)

I'm not Jewish but I am LGBT and old enough to have VERY vivid memories of an epidemic where people like me were painted as non-persons who were perfectly fine collateral damage and punchline to a lot of jokes...up until straight guys started getting it. Only then was it taken seriously.

If you're not part of a population that has been the target of active or passive genocide....just sit still and breathe when someone who belongs to a group that has expresses frustration with something you said. Think about their point of view, which is different from yours, and then decide how to proceed after reflection.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Withywindle (Reply #53)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 12:27 PM

56. Thanks for 'splainin' all that to me. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Progressive Jones (Reply #17)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 06:10 PM

22. You don't get out enough. Racism and antisemitism is worse than ever and I don't see ...

any program that is trying to put a lid on it. You know, only 'fine people on both sides' and that level of crap.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #22)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:17 PM

27. Considering that I firmly believe that the only good nazis are dead nazis, you are telling the wrong

guy he doesn't get out enough.

(yes, I support a white nationalist "purging" so to speak. Fuck their feelings...)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Progressive Jones (Reply #27)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:38 PM

29. What are you mad at me for? I honestly was responding to your comment, I don't know anything ...

about you personally. I am sorry I came off that way.


btw: we are on the same fucking side.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #29)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:52 PM

32. Peace. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 04:05 PM

16. Trump's fellow nationalists.

Trump's fellow nationalists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 05:38 PM

19. This sounds too stupid to be real.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Firestorm49 (Reply #19)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 06:13 PM

23. Trump sounded too stupid to be President. Yet there he is. Stupid is the hallmark of anything ...

the RW creates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:16 PM

26. Those are trump supporters

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 09:54 PM

33. White ISIS

Treat them the same. Do raids and start digging them out where ever they are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DashOneBravo (Reply #33)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 10:11 PM

38. I've been saying this since Charlottesville.

When you play with white supremacy and white nationalism, you are playing with fire. And Trump lit the match.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Reply #38)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 08:59 PM

59. That may be where I got that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 10:06 PM

35. This is terrorism. Hell, it's bio terrorism.

All from Trump's "very fine people".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Mon Mar 23, 2020, 11:22 PM

43. Eco-Sabotage equals Eco-Terrorism. Bio-Terrorism/Attempted Murder equals White Supremacy/Extremism

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Tue Mar 24, 2020, 07:33 PM

57. It wouldn't have to be violent or hurt. . .

I would just like all of these neo nazis to be. . . dead.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Original post)

Thu Mar 26, 2020, 08:41 AM

58. Kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread