Fri Feb 28, 2020, 02:32 PM
Jirel (1,825 posts)
President Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' policy blocked in federal court
Source: Washington Post
A federal appeals court in California halted the Trump administration’s “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy on Friday, a blow to the president’s restrictive immigration agenda that cripples one of the government’s approaches to curbing migration across the U.S. southern border. The program — officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, or MPP — called for pushing asylum seekers back into Mexico to await their U.S. asylum hearings, part of an effort to limit migrant access to U.S. soil and to lessen a record migration surge among Central American families. More than 470,000 parents and children crossed into the United States last fiscal year, and most were quickly freed into the country to await U.S. immigration court hearings after they claimed asylum. The Trump administration has claimed that the migrant families have been exploiting loopholes in U.S. law to secure their release, knowing of the court-mandated 20-day limit for detaining children. The MPP program was designed to prevent families from entering the United States and later skipping their court hearings to avoid deportation; instead, families have been sitting on the Mexico side of the border. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 to uphold a lower-court’s injunction on MPP, saying that the policy “is invalid in its entirety due to its inconsistency with” federal law, and “should be enjoined in its entirety.” Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/trump-remain-in-mexico-halted-federal-court/2020/02/28/87bbf85e-e481-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html?fbclid=IwAR0lbOcHN16KJHrPeRfdHjmyIJm1i_k0XBqnn8-R0psO4B4aNDbkYwpalZQ
|
5 replies, 2120 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Jirel | Feb 2020 | OP |
LakeArenal | Feb 2020 | #1 | |
mpcamb | Feb 2020 | #2 | |
iluvtennis | Feb 2020 | #3 | |
Dem2theMax | Feb 2020 | #4 | |
Eugene | Feb 2020 | #5 |
Response to Jirel (Original post)
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 02:34 PM
LakeArenal (26,448 posts)
1. I hate the assumption by Repukes
That Hispanic refugees are gaming some system.
Cripes. They are way too cashless and subjugated to find enough lawyers and patronage to work any system. We know who is working the system and it ain’t immigrants. |
Response to LakeArenal (Reply #1)
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 04:14 PM
mpcamb (2,716 posts)
2. Gaming the system is when you resort to legal delays. Justice postponed is justice denied.
It's their bread and butter.
|
Response to Jirel (Original post)
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 05:33 PM
iluvtennis (18,087 posts)
3. Excellent news!
Response to Jirel (Original post)
Fri Feb 28, 2020, 08:50 PM
Dem2theMax (9,421 posts)
4. My eyes must be tired.
When I looked at the headline I thought it said
'President Trump's remains in Mexico.' Wishful thinking on my part? ![]() |
Response to Jirel (Original post)
Sat Feb 29, 2020, 08:12 AM
Eugene (57,244 posts)
5. Court halts Trump asylum policy, then suspends its own order
Source: Associated Press
Court halts Trump asylum policy, then suspends its own order
By ELLIOT SPAGAT February 29, 2020 SAN DIEGO (AP) — A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel voted unanimously Friday to suspend an order it issued earlier in the day to block a central pillar of the Trump administration’s policy requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases wind through U.S. courts. The three-judge panel told the government to file written arguments by the end of Monday and for the plaintiffs to respond by the end of Tuesday. The Justice Department said at least 25,000 asylum seekers subject to the policy are currently waiting in Mexico and expressed “massive and irreparable national-security of public-safety concerns.” Government attorneys said immigration lawyers had begun demanding that asylum seekers be allowed in the United States, with one insisting that 1,000 people be allowed to enter at one location. “The Court’s reinstatement of the injunction causes the United States public and the government significant and irreparable harms — to border security, public safety, public health, and diplomatic relations,” Justice Department attorneys wrote. -snip- Read more: https://apnews.com/48092a71a9008e4c76e195e5fb366ea3 |