HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » NEW: DC Circuit panel put...

Wed Nov 27, 2019, 08:22 PM

NEW: DC Circuit panel puts hold on McGahn testimony for now, will hear arguments on Jan. 3....

Source: Todd Ruger's Twitter account

NEW: DC Circuit panel puts hold on McGahn testimony for now, will hear arguments on Jan. 3 about whether he must comply with House Judiciary Committee subpoena.

Read more:




Kevin M. Kruse Retweeted

https://twitter.com/KevinMKruse

January. 3rd. 🙃🙃🙃




Trump is winning by running out the clock on legal cases. Not dissimilar from how his team slow-walked Mueller responses from the president. Via @charlie_savage




--------

Sorry. Twitter's all I've got. BumRushDaShow, are you still up? Got anything better?

7 replies, 1379 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply NEW: DC Circuit panel puts hold on McGahn testimony for now, will hear arguments on Jan. 3.... (Original post)
mahatmakanejeeves Nov 27 OP
hlthe2b Nov 27 #1
hlthe2b Nov 27 #2
mahatmakanejeeves Nov 28 #5
onenote Nov 28 #6
Chin music Nov 27 #3
jaysunb Nov 27 #4
Buckeyeblue Nov 29 #7

Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Wed Nov 27, 2019, 08:29 PM

1. Panel is two Bush family appointees (Henderson, Griffith) and a Clinton appointee (Rogers).

Circuit Court will hear the case on 1/3. Panel is two Bush family appointees (Henderson, Griffith) and a Clinton appointee (Rogers). Henderson voted in favor of en banc rehearing on Mazars, so she seems a bad draw. Griffith is now the wild card in this and Mueller grand jury case




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hlthe2b (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 27, 2019, 08:32 PM

2. Order:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hlthe2b (Reply #2)

Thu Nov 28, 2019, 05:45 AM

5. Thanks for coming up with the links and tweets.

I'm on dial-up at home. I can't do a lot of searching.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hlthe2b (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 28, 2019, 08:53 AM

6. These are not necessarily the three judges that will hear the case.

I believe this was the "motions panel" that currently handles motions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)


Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Wed Nov 27, 2019, 08:39 PM

4. McGahn sholud be reminded abot the statute of limintations. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Fri Nov 29, 2019, 11:44 AM

7. If possible why not fast-track this to the Supreme Court?

It's a pretty simple question about the supeana power of the House. It seems like the Republicans wouldn't want to risk losing this power when the shoe is on the other foot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread