Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(127,331 posts)
Mon Oct 28, 2019, 07:37 PM Oct 2019

Federal judge reinstates libel lawsuit filed by Covington Catholic teen against Washington Post

Source: Washington Post



A federal judge reinstated part of a lawsuit against The Washington Post filed by the family of a Kentucky teenager that alleged the newspaper libeled the teen in its coverage of his encounter with a Native American activist at the Lincoln Memorial earlier this year. Judge William O. Bertelsman, who rejected the suit in July on First Amendment grounds, said Monday he would allow it to go forward, but narrowed its scope from 33 published statements to three.

The family of Nicholas Sandmann filed suit against The Post in February, alleging that the paper “targeted and bullied” the 16-year-old in articles about his role in an incident involving Nathan Phillips, a Native American advocate. The family sought $250 million in damages. Sandmann was on a school trip with classmates from Covington Catholic High School in Kentucky when the students encountered Phillips on the memorial’s steps. Sandmann and some of his classmates were wearing red “Make America Great Again” hats as they chanted school cheers and Phillips, beating a small drum, approached them.

Videos and news accounts, including in The Post, sparked a heated national debate over what happened next. Phillips claimed Sandmann, who stood in Phillips’ path, had blocked Phillips’ progress. Sandmann later denied doing so, saying he had acted respectfully and had no intention of impeding Phillips. Bertelsman had thrown out the Sandmanns’ claims three months ago, ruling that none of the 33 statements they’d sued over were defamatory and that the majority constituted protected opinion.

“The court accepts Sandmann’s statement that, when he was standing motionless in the confrontation with Phillips, his intent was to calm the situation and not impede or block anyone,” the judge wrote in July. “However, Phillips did not see it that way. He concluded that he was being ‘blocked’ and not allowed to ‘retreat.’ He passed these conclusions on to The Post. They may have been erroneous, but .?.?. they are opinion protected by the First Amendment. And The Post is not liable for publishing these opinions.” But the judge reconsidered on Monday, saying he would permit discovery to proceed on three statements contained in Post articles, specifically that Sandmann had “blocked” Phillips as he ascended the memorial’s stairs and “would not allow him to retreat.” Bertelsman didn’t explain why he reconsidered and found these statements to be potentially defamatory now.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/federal-judge-reinstates-libel-lawsuit-filed-by-covington-catholic-teen-against-washington-post/2019/10/28/30155c52-f9ae-11e9-ac8c-8eced29ca6ef_story.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge reinstates libel lawsuit filed by Covington Catholic teen against Washington Post (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Oct 2019 OP
In Case You've Forgotten, Hunt 4 Blue November Oct 2019 #1
No but I try to MustLoveBeagles Oct 2019 #2
But he made statements about his background that were less than 100% truthful alp227 Oct 2019 #7
I don't think it does as you don't get to pick where they send you when you enlist. nt Baltimike Oct 2019 #12
Vietnam times veteran atreides1 Oct 2019 #15
No but he did say he was a "recon ranger" Jake Stern Oct 2019 #17
Human scum teen? keithbvadu2 Oct 2019 #4
Appears to be. 2naSalit Oct 2019 #5
Congratulations, Mr. and Mrs. Sandmann . . . NellieStarbuck Oct 2019 #10
Haven't forgotten. Entitled white punk mocking/ trying to intimidate Native American and then Evolve Dammit Oct 2019 #3
Affluenza striking once again. Tech Oct 2019 #6
Damn! Why didn't I think of that??? It's so obvious! Hunt 4 Blue November Oct 2019 #16
Lame decision by the judge. He should have left it dismissed. SunSeeker Oct 2019 #8
This judge was first appointed BlueMTexpat Oct 2019 #9
At this point, it is what it is bucolic_frolic Oct 2019 #11
Pure money grab. Scarsdale Oct 2019 #13
most normal parents would have been mortified by their sons behavior acting like this... Javaman Oct 2019 #14

MustLoveBeagles

(11,563 posts)
2. No but I try to
Mon Oct 28, 2019, 08:31 PM
Oct 2019

Nathan is a far better man than these little MAGAT's could ever hope to be. He was telling the truth and I hate the way he was gaslighted by the media.

alp227

(31,962 posts)
7. But he made statements about his background that were less than 100% truthful
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 12:55 AM
Oct 2019

Because he used "Vietnam times veteran" and other such wording that could be easily interpreted to mean (falsely) that he served overseas during the Vietnam war.

atreides1

(16,047 posts)
15. Vietnam times veteran
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 01:46 PM
Oct 2019

In accordance with the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, Phillips is classified as a Vietnam-era veteran.

I would say that "times" is another word for era...so Phillips was truthful!

He never said he served in Vietnam, did he?

Maybe to you the wording could be interpreted that way...being a veteran myself and the son of a father who served in Vietnam, I would know the difference.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
17. No but he did say he was a "recon ranger"
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 10:13 PM
Oct 2019

When, IIRC, his MOS was a refrigeration specialist. Essentially a glorified AC repairman.

NellieStarbuck

(265 posts)
10. Congratulations, Mr. and Mrs. Sandmann . . .
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 06:59 AM
Oct 2019

. . . on raising a nasty, entitled, smirking little shitheel. I'm sure he'll make a good douchebag someday!

Evolve Dammit

(16,632 posts)
3. Haven't forgotten. Entitled white punk mocking/ trying to intimidate Native American and then
Mon Oct 28, 2019, 08:36 PM
Oct 2019

playing victim. Enabled by like-minded parents who trained their son, friends, family and well-paid lawyers.

BlueMTexpat

(15,350 posts)
9. This judge was first appointed
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 03:55 AM
Oct 2019

to the bench by President Jimmy Carter in 1979. He attained senior status in 2001. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Odis_Bertelsman

It's time for him to retire because this is a stupid decision.

bucolic_frolic

(42,680 posts)
11. At this point, it is what it is
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 08:50 AM
Oct 2019

Let them discover nothing, and find there is nothing to rule on, if that's what it is, which is what it sounds like. There's no there there.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
13. Pure money grab.
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 09:35 AM
Oct 2019

The parents thought they found a way to enrich themselves, pay for this little shit's college tuition, with lots left over. Too bad they never taught their son to respect his elders. Where were the chaperones, by the way? One of them should have made this little snot back down, and get some manners. Typicl republican asshole. Maybe he will run for office one day, then get his free money.

Javaman

(62,444 posts)
14. most normal parents would have been mortified by their sons behavior acting like this...
Tue Oct 29, 2019, 10:23 AM
Oct 2019

not the rich. they see a pay day.

greed is the only religion that requires no empathy.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge reinstates ...