Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,394 posts)
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 10:43 AM Jul 2019

Stricken Russian Nuke Sub Crew Prevented 'Planetary Catastrophe'

Source: Bloomberg

Politics

Stricken Russian Nuke Sub Crew Prevented 'Planetary Catastrophe'

By Henry Meyer and Stepan Kravchenko
July 8, 2019, 7:19 AM EDT

-- Top officer praises role of 14 dead sailors, Fontanka says
-- Russian authorities were slow to give information on accident

The 14 sailors who died during a fire last week on a nuclear-powered Russian military submarine prevented a "planetary catastrophe," a top naval officer said at their funeral, according to media reports. ... Captain Sergei Pavlov, an aide to the commander of Russia's navy, praised the heroism of the men, who died as they battled to stop the fire from spreading in the submersible. ... "With their lives, they saved the lives of their colleagues, saved the vessel and prevented a planetary catastrophe," he said at the funeral Sunday attended by the navy chief according to the Fontanka news service.
....

'Absolutely Classified'

Russian authorities had previously refused to say whether the country's worst naval incident in more than a decade involved a nuclear-powered vessel. They have also refused to say what type of craft was involved, with the Kremlin calling the information "absolutely classified." Neighboring Norway contacted Russia for more details though it said it hadn't detected any increased radiation levels.

The vessel is linked to a secret nuclear-submarine project known as Losharik, RBC news website reported. Russia said the sailors died from smoke inhalation after the fire started while the deep-water submersible was exploring the sea bed in its territorial waters. The craft was later taken to the Russian Northern Fleet's Severomorsk base on the Barents Sea coast.

The fire was Russia's most serious naval incident since 20 people died on a Nerpa nuclear submarine in 2008. The Losharik submarine can operate at a depth of 6,000 meters (20,000 feet), according to RBC. The craft reportedly was used to target undersea communications and other cables.
....

Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-08/stricken-russian-nuke-sub-crew-prevented-planetary-catastrophe



Rick Wilson Retweeted

https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson?langen

BREAKING: Sailors who died fighting fire on a nuclear-powered Russian submarine last week averted a "planetary catastrophe," top naval officer says https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-08/stricken-russian-nuke-sub-crew-prevented-planetary-catastrophe ... via @bpolitics


18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stricken Russian Nuke Sub Crew Prevented 'Planetary Catastrophe' (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2019 OP
This is so sad. Mach1miles Jul 2019 #1
Given the number of naval reactors that have simply vanished into the seas over the years AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #2
I kind of took that as an 'environmental' catastrophe pecosbob Jul 2019 #4
That would make sense. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #5
It would make sense, in that it downplays the drama and fits with likely tech. Igel Jul 2019 #12
ikr bluewater Jul 2019 #9
The New Cold War pecosbob Jul 2019 #3
What's a little radiation poisoning? czarjak Jul 2019 #6
I wonder if this is why Pence was called back to the Whitehouse last week Dorn Jul 2019 #7
Does Pence Have Any Interaction With Epstein?....nt global1 Jul 2019 #8
KARMA? Brainfodder Jul 2019 #10
history repeating itself, Soviet submarine K-19. nt yaesu Jul 2019 #11
Vlad has his echo chamber. saidsimplesimon Jul 2019 #13
Seems to me Russia does Not have a good track record when dealing with nuclear reactors. Farmer-Rick Jul 2019 #14
I should feel sad for these saboteurs in training ? bluedigger Jul 2019 #15
'Planetary catastrophe' is a typical Russian PR move. We'll really never know, will we. ancianita Jul 2019 #16
I feel bad for the sailors and their families. Sapient Donkey Jul 2019 #17
! Marcuse Jul 2019 #18
 

Mach1miles

(95 posts)
1. This is so sad.
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 10:57 AM
Jul 2019

It is heartbreaking that so much effort is put into machines of war. For those who may haven given all to avoid disaster, I say thank you. My thoughts are with the survivors and the families of those lost.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
2. Given the number of naval reactors that have simply vanished into the seas over the years
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 11:06 AM
Jul 2019

with nary a burp from the oceans, one wonders what it is about this particular incident that had potential for 'planetary catastrophe'?

Igel

(35,300 posts)
12. It would make sense, in that it downplays the drama and fits with likely tech.
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 11:54 AM
Jul 2019

On the other hand, it would actually be wrong. (on edit: Given what was reported to have been said. I have no video of the funeral.)

The "high placed military personnel" that was at the funeral of the sailors who died said, "не допустили катастрофы планетарного масштаба."

A clumsy, overly parallel translation would be "did not permit a catastrophe of world-wide proportions to happen".

Peskov, somewhat later, (he's the chief Kremlin spokesfolk) said he didn't know if those word were said or, if they were, who said them. Otherwise he left it hanging, as far as I can tell. (But, to be honest, it's not worth a huge amount of time.) https://tsargrad.tv/news/katastrofa-planetarnogo-masshtaba-na-as-31-losharik-doshla-do-kremlja_207267

I side with the option of the twit who tweeted, "if these words weren't said for rhetorical effect" and assume that they were, in fact, not about the vaunted Putinesque atomic wonder-weapon (referred to in the tweet).

bluewater

(5,376 posts)
9. ikr
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 11:39 AM
Jul 2019

Didn't VP Pence suddenly cancel a trip and return to Washington when this broke?

The responses seemed more intense that the "usual" nuclear submarine disaster.

The whole "research vessel" description of the incident fanned speculation too.

pecosbob

(7,537 posts)
3. The New Cold War
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 11:07 AM
Jul 2019

I served in the first one...chasing Soviet Boomers. Good sailors...bad engineers, the Russians.

Brainfodder

(6,423 posts)
10. KARMA?
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 11:51 AM
Jul 2019

Soft selling Russian spying and possible sabotage attempt gone wrong?

The finale of the Twilight Zone rolls on!

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
13. Vlad has his echo chamber.
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 12:03 PM
Jul 2019

The fat man without a brain sitting constipated on an overflowing toilet. (I'm willing to bet that Vlad enjoys the image.)

Farmer-Rick

(10,154 posts)
14. Seems to me Russia does Not have a good track record when dealing with nuclear reactors.
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 12:12 PM
Jul 2019

short little man Vlad just can't seem to get it right.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
16. 'Planetary catastrophe' is a typical Russian PR move. We'll really never know, will we.
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 12:57 PM
Jul 2019

I don't believe their pretensions of truth telling. Ever.

Sapient Donkey

(1,568 posts)
17. I feel bad for the sailors and their families.
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 02:51 PM
Jul 2019

I wonder if Russia will compensate the family's of the sailors. Who, in their words, prevented a catastrophe much worse.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Stricken Russian Nuke Sub...