White House directs former counsel Don McGahn not to testify before House panel
Source: CNN
(CNN)Former White House counsel Don McGahn is not expected to appear Tuesday before the House Judiciary Committee, defying the committee's subpoena and setting the stage for another contempt vote to retaliate against the Trump administration for rejecting the demands of Congress.
The White House argues that as a former senior adviser to the President, he is exempt from having to appear before Congress. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel concluded that former McGahn was not legally required to appear before the House Judiciary Committee and testify about matters related to his official duties as counsel to the President, according to a memo issued Monday and obtained by CNN.
"The Department of Justice has advised me that Mr. McGahn is absolutely immune from compelled congressional testimony with respect to matters occurring during his service as a senior adviser to the President," White House Counsel Pat Cipollone wrote in a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement that McGahn "cannot be forced to give such testimony, and Mr. McGahn has been directed to act accordingly." "This action has been taken in order to ensure that future Presidents can effectively execute the responsibilities of the Office of the Presidency," she said.
Read more: https://us.cnn.com/2019/05/20/politics/white-house-blocks-don-mcgahn-congress/index.html
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)All to see. How much longer do we have to put up with this? Is anyone going to do the right thing here?
cstanleytech
(26,280 posts)the Trump administration is using directly violates the Constitution as it is preventing Congress from exerting its oversight powers and I agree its obstruction and thus impeachable.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)Committing impeachable offenses every day.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)"In a letter to Representative Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the presidents top lawyer said that as a member of the executive branch the political director, David Simas, had immunity from being compelled to testify before Congress."
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/16/us/politics/obama-official-wont-testify-to-congress.html
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)Over there apparently
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)He has no power to block McGahn.
in2herbs
(2,945 posts)never raised executive privilege at that time??
BumRushDaShow
(128,748 posts)(I think from back in March on CNN's website) that claimed that the executive privilege waiver supposedly only applied to those folks talking to Mueller vs any of them testifying to Congress. Not sure how far that argument could fly however.
turbinetree
(24,688 posts)and his "current legal team" that you once represented want's "you" to throw yourself under the criminal enterprise bus........let's see what your Federalist Society values say...................since you were once on the team that recommended the packing of the courts with your ilk.................