Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,748 posts)
Mon May 20, 2019, 05:17 PM May 2019

White House directs former counsel Don McGahn not to testify before House panel

Source: CNN

(CNN)Former White House counsel Don McGahn is not expected to appear Tuesday before the House Judiciary Committee, defying the committee's subpoena and setting the stage for another contempt vote to retaliate against the Trump administration for rejecting the demands of Congress.

The White House argues that as a former senior adviser to the President, he is exempt from having to appear before Congress. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel concluded that former McGahn was not legally required to appear before the House Judiciary Committee and testify about matters related to his official duties as counsel to the President, according to a memo issued Monday and obtained by CNN.

"The Department of Justice has advised me that Mr. McGahn is absolutely immune from compelled congressional testimony with respect to matters occurring during his service as a senior adviser to the President," White House Counsel Pat Cipollone wrote in a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement that McGahn "cannot be forced to give such testimony, and Mr. McGahn has been directed to act accordingly." "This action has been taken in order to ensure that future Presidents can effectively execute the responsibilities of the Office of the Presidency," she said.

Read more: https://us.cnn.com/2019/05/20/politics/white-house-blocks-don-mcgahn-congress/index.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gldstwmn

(4,575 posts)
1. Blatantly obstucting justice for
Mon May 20, 2019, 05:19 PM
May 2019

All to see. How much longer do we have to put up with this? Is anyone going to do the right thing here?

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
2. While I can understand some people being exempt from testifying the blanket approach
Mon May 20, 2019, 05:23 PM
May 2019

the Trump administration is using directly violates the Constitution as it is preventing Congress from exerting its oversight powers and I agree its obstruction and thus impeachable.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
10. Exactly, it's very different from this situation a few years ago.
Mon May 20, 2019, 08:14 PM
May 2019

"In a letter to Representative Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the president’s top lawyer said that as a member of the executive branch the political director, David Simas, had immunity from being compelled to testify before Congress."

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/16/us/politics/obama-official-wont-testify-to-congress.html

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
6. Trump can direct in one hand, and shit in the other, and see which gets filled first.
Mon May 20, 2019, 05:33 PM
May 2019

He has no power to block McGahn.

in2herbs

(2,945 posts)
7. Isn't one reason that McGahn is able to testify is that he already spoke to Mueller and the WH
Mon May 20, 2019, 06:25 PM
May 2019

never raised executive privilege at that time??

BumRushDaShow

(128,748 posts)
8. I did see one opinion article
Mon May 20, 2019, 06:30 PM
May 2019

(I think from back in March on CNN's website) that claimed that the executive privilege waiver supposedly only applied to those folks talking to Mueller vs any of them testifying to Congress. Not sure how far that argument could fly however.

turbinetree

(24,688 posts)
9. Hey McGahn.....................do you understand "criminal intent" because that asshole
Mon May 20, 2019, 06:36 PM
May 2019

and his "current legal team" that you once represented want's "you" to throw yourself under the criminal enterprise bus........let's see what your Federalist Society values say...................since you were once on the team that recommended the packing of the courts with your ilk.................

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House directs forme...