Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

George II

(67,782 posts)
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:02 PM Feb 2019

Pelosi announces Dems for new climate panel

Source: Politico

Speaker Nancy Pelosi built out the Democratic roster for her special select panel on climate change Thursday, pulling from a mix of old and new lawmakers but leaving off the highest profile freshmen like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).

The announcement, on the same day that the proposal for the lofty Green New Deal lands on Capitol Hill and one day after the first climate change hearings in years, gives a further boost to Democratic efforts to bring the issue to the forefront of their agenda.

“I want everybody to be in on the act because this is deadly serious,” Pelosi said in an interview Wednesday, adding that the panel will focus on global warming “from the standpoint of health, security, economics and morality.”

The new House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis will be led by Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), and raising public awareness of the issue will be a top priority; just 35 percent of Americans consider climate change an imminent threat.

The other Democratic members of the panel are Reps. Ben Ray Luján (N.M.), Suzanne Bonamici (Ore.), Julia Brownley (Calif.), Sean Casten (Ill.), Jared Huffman (Calif.), Mike Levin (Calif.), Donald McEachin (Va.) and Joe Neguse (Colo.).

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/07/pelosi-climate-change-panel-1154847



(I posted five paragraphs to include all the members' names)

This was stunning:

After her weekly press conference Thursday, Pelosi told reporters she invited Ocasio-Cortez to be on the panel and that she declined.
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pelosi announces Dems for new climate panel (Original Post) George II Feb 2019 OP
I take it no GOPee congresscritter volunteered for a spot sandensea Feb 2019 #1
I presume Kevin McCarthy will announce their appointees. George II Feb 2019 #5
Louie Gohmert and Mo Brooks among them, no doubt sandensea Feb 2019 #11
... George II Feb 2019 #13
Declined? Eliot Rosewater Feb 2019 #2
Yes, that's odd. LisaM Feb 2019 #6
Someday we will be able to openly discuss JD and how their agenda is to harm Democrats Eliot Rosewater Feb 2019 #7
Probably not here zipplewrath Feb 2019 #10
Especially CERTAIN Democrats NastyRiffraff Feb 2019 #14
JD? YessirAtsaFact Feb 2019 #16
"Justice Democrats". BumRushDaShow Feb 2019 #17
The keystone of her Congressional agenda was supposed to have been... George II Feb 2019 #9
She's on Oversight, so you can imagine how much she has to sift through. Qutzupalotl Feb 2019 #22
True, she clearly wasn't snubbed. It's just odd that she decided to not be a member.... George II Feb 2019 #25
Maybe she read Cillizza's hit piece headline on Pelosi supposedly throwing shade on her and threw a PeeJ52 Feb 2019 #15
Since all but one of the appointees... SixString Feb 2019 #24
I see, so if the committee is imperfect, ignore it. If the candidate is imperfect, allow the Eliot Rosewater Feb 2019 #26
I seriously doubt that. Are you implying the other members are only there to make money? George II Feb 2019 #28
I do love how everything is coming together yaesu Feb 2019 #3
Several possibilities zipplewrath Feb 2019 #8
yes, lots of interesting possibilities. nt yaesu Feb 2019 #12
And quite possibly she did the adult thing... Johnyawl Feb 2019 #19
I seriously doubt that - don't forget this is the committee that she demanded be created.... George II Feb 2019 #21
This was the committee that she demanded be formed by Pelosi back in November. George II Feb 2019 #18
Heard AOC interviewed by Chuck Todd this afternoon summer_in_TX Feb 2019 #34
AOC explained it shellyleit Feb 2019 #36
that makes sense, maybe she would have taken it if asked sooner but felt obligated to the yaesu Feb 2019 #37
Got that impression. summer_in_TX Feb 2019 #38
Jared Huffman is a great choice!!! cally Feb 2019 #4
Nothing against Suzanne Bonamici, but... Reader Rabbit Feb 2019 #20
With Mike Levin on the committee. rogue emissary Feb 2019 #23
Good on all the members who didn't "decline.. Cha Feb 2019 #27
this panel has no real power. It's no surprise AOC declined. Kurt V. Feb 2019 #29
Under ordinary circumstances that would make sense, but she insisted that Speaker Pelosi... George II Feb 2019 #30
the committee didn't develope as she had hoped . this sounds like created drama, Kurt V. Feb 2019 #31
When life gives you lemons, you make lemonade. Now, when she's Speaker............... George II Feb 2019 #32
+100 Kurt V. Feb 2019 #33
Just in case not enough is done in the next few years, Cold War Spook Feb 2019 #35

sandensea

(21,600 posts)
11. Louie Gohmert and Mo Brooks among them, no doubt
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:26 PM
Feb 2019

He wants real bomb throwers in there, or no one at all.

On the other hand, I was hoping for another snowball stunt.

LisaM

(27,794 posts)
6. Yes, that's odd.
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:18 PM
Feb 2019

Some of the stuff she does (like working against other Democrats) raises little red flags for me, but it also could just be that she's already got a lot on her plate.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
10. Probably not here
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:23 PM
Feb 2019

Discussing democrats with whom one opposes is difficult around here. Juries can be quick to act.

George II

(67,782 posts)
9. The keystone of her Congressional agenda was supposed to have been...
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:22 PM
Feb 2019

...the "Green New Deal". She was one of the organizers of that demonstration outside Pelosi's office back in November. One would think she would leave some room on her plate for that.

Qutzupalotl

(14,286 posts)
22. She's on Oversight, so you can imagine how much she has to sift through.
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 04:45 PM
Feb 2019

Not only are the violations blatant, they’re almost innumerable. So she has a daunting task.

I’m glad AOC was offered a spot and declined rather than (as it’s being spun) getting snubbed.

George II

(67,782 posts)
25. True, she clearly wasn't snubbed. It's just odd that she decided to not be a member....
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 05:09 PM
Feb 2019

....of a committee that she demanded be created.

 

PeeJ52

(1,588 posts)
15. Maybe she read Cillizza's hit piece headline on Pelosi supposedly throwing shade on her and threw a
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:31 PM
Feb 2019

sad... Ya never know... don't take long to grow an ego in DC, I hear...

SixString

(1,057 posts)
24. Since all but one of the appointees...
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 05:02 PM
Feb 2019

received money from fossil fuel industry PACS, maybe she thought it would be a waste of time.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,106 posts)
26. I see, so if the committee is imperfect, ignore it. If the candidate is imperfect, allow the
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 05:44 PM
Feb 2019

traitor to win?

George II

(67,782 posts)
28. I seriously doubt that. Are you implying the other members are only there to make money?
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 06:04 PM
Feb 2019

Being on the committee would give her an opportunity to counter any (non-existent) bias.

yaesu

(8,020 posts)
3. I do love how everything is coming together
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:13 PM
Feb 2019

I wonder why Ocasio-Cortez declined, seems like the panel would be perfect for her.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
8. Several possibilities
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:22 PM
Feb 2019

She might have felt, or been told, that if she was ON the committee, she'd have to work THROUGH the committee and she didn't want to do that.
Alternately, Pelosi may have asked for something in return that AOC didn't want to give or do.
Or AOC may perceive this is Pelosi's way of avoiding making any real progress on the issue yet and didn't want to participate.
Or she and Pelosi may have had a discussion and Pelosi advised her that she COULD be on the committee but maybe she'd be more effective, or happier NOT being on it.

Johnyawl

(3,205 posts)
19. And quite possibly she did the adult thing...
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:48 PM
Feb 2019

...at declined to avoid becoming the issue. Since this is a 'signature' issue for AOC Nancy may have thought that her being on the committee would undercut whoever is running it. The media would have treated her like she was running things.

George II

(67,782 posts)
21. I seriously doubt that - don't forget this is the committee that she demanded be created....
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:56 PM
Feb 2019

....back in November. Remember the Sunrise Movement sit-in that she organized outside Pelosi's office?

summer_in_TX

(2,710 posts)
34. Heard AOC interviewed by Chuck Todd this afternoon
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 08:52 PM
Feb 2019

Contrary to his usual, it was a very good interview. He asked good questions and gave her time to answer and interact. He asked her about that, and she was at the point of having enough committee and subcommittee assignments that she thought she was at her personal limit to do good work and serve her constituents well. She's on the powerful Financial Services committee chaired by Maxine Waters (a rarity for a freshman), as well as the House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform (chaired by Elijah Cummings), and (if I heard her correctly) three subcommittees now.

shellyleit

(17 posts)
36. AOC explained it
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 09:46 PM
Feb 2019

Yep, I heard the interview too. She said she was on many other committees and didn't want to do a bad job on them. I got the impression she did not want to spread herself too thin. Still, it's kind of weird and she might just be putting the best possible spin on it.

yaesu

(8,020 posts)
37. that makes sense, maybe she would have taken it if asked sooner but felt obligated to the
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 09:59 PM
Feb 2019

other committees she already joined.

summer_in_TX

(2,710 posts)
38. Got that impression.
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 10:11 PM
Feb 2019

It was reconstituted after the other committee appointments were made apparently and by that time she'd gotten her plate full.

cally

(21,591 posts)
4. Jared Huffman is a great choice!!!
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:14 PM
Feb 2019

Started out as an NRDC lawyer and probably won first election (State Assembly) because of his environmental credentials and endorsements.

Reader Rabbit

(2,624 posts)
20. Nothing against Suzanne Bonamici, but...
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 03:51 PM
Feb 2019

Earl Blumenauer (OR-3) has more experience with environmental/climate issues, at least from the perspective of most Oregonians. Maybe Earl is already on too many committees?

rogue emissary

(3,147 posts)
23. With Mike Levin on the committee.
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 04:59 PM
Feb 2019

I'm excited to see what legislation they propose. He's been a very effective and passionate believer in fighting climate change.

Cha

(296,825 posts)
27. Good on all the members who didn't "decline..
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 05:59 PM
Feb 2019

Mahalo, George.

Benny Ray Luján

"..the U.S. Representative for New Mexico's 3rd congressional district since 2009, and as the Assistant House Speaker since 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, Luján previously served as a member of the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission from 2005 to 2008. He was elected to be Chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2014, and led the Democrats to win a majority in the House in the 2018 elections. Luján's district is based in Santa Fe, the state capital, and includes most of the northern portion of the state."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Ray_Luj%C3%A1n

George II

(67,782 posts)
30. Under ordinary circumstances that would make sense, but she insisted that Speaker Pelosi...
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 07:29 PM
Feb 2019

...resurrect this committee. She got hundreds of people to demonstrate outside Pelosi's office asking to get it resurrected.

A committee working on developing policy on climate change is important. That she declined to serve on that committee was strange.

Kurt V.

(5,624 posts)
31. the committee didn't develope as she had hoped . this sounds like created drama,
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 07:42 PM
Feb 2019

but I'm sure that's beneath us.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
35. Just in case not enough is done in the next few years,
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 09:07 PM
Feb 2019

I hope Musk is able to save a few people by setting up a colony on Mars. Good tv show on Netflix. Takes place on Mars starting in 2033, but it also has real scientists explaining what needs to be done now for it to have a chance to succeed. I have very little, almost no faith that the Earth will be livable for humans by 2100.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pelosi announces Dems for...