Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 09:17 AM Jul 2018

Trump Claims Twitter Engaged in 'Illegal Practice' of 'Shadow Banning' Republicans

Source: Mediate



by Caleb Howe | Jul 26th, 2018, 8:27 am

On Thursday, Donald Trump tweeted that Twitter has been “shadow banning’ prominent members of the GOP, and called it “discriminatory and illegal”, and said that the administration will “look into” it.




The president is likely referring to a story published by Vice News on Wednesday about the practice. Twitter has admitted in the past to using the practice, which is a way of limiting the visibility of certain types of tweets or particular users, hiding them from search results and the news feeds of other users, but has stated it is only used for abusive accounts or content.

Vice Reports that Twitter says the shadow banning of GOPers “is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform,” but points out that it does not appear to affect top Democrats. Among the accounts the listed were GOP chair Ronna McDaniel, Republican Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Donald Trump Jr. spokesman Andrew Surabian and others.

The president did not explain how it would be an “illegal” practice.

###

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-claims-twitter-engaged-in-illegal-practice-of-shadow-banning-republicans/
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Claims Twitter Engaged in 'Illegal Practice' of 'Shadow Banning' Republicans (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2018 OP
Whiners. 2naSalit Jul 2018 #1
Not an Attorney Roy Rolling Jul 2018 #2
You got me. I'm stealing that. underpants Jul 2018 #10
Funny! Great line! n/m machoneman Jul 2018 #16
Hahaha got me good! blugbox Jul 2018 #19
It's still early.... Wuddles440 Jul 2018 #21
He shouldn't be bitching bc Crutchez_CuiBono Jul 2018 #3
Fake News Generator and BS Tweeter calls kettle black bucolic_frolic Jul 2018 #4
Twitter Is Not 'Shadow Banning' Republicans New York Magazine riversedge Jul 2018 #5
+1 dalton99a Jul 2018 #7
Wonder if this is really about russian bots getting kicked out? lark Jul 2018 #14
Yes I'd say. It's easy for small-minded wingers to make the connection... machoneman Jul 2018 #18
Hypocrite bans CNN corrrespondent bucolic_frolic Jul 2018 #6
well you know the cnn reporter hurt Trump's ego. she had to be punished! that is what Trump does! riversedge Jul 2018 #15
He violates their posted terms of service on literally a daily basis. Dave Starsky Jul 2018 #8
How is it illegal? This is the same government that just shot down net sinkingfeeling Jul 2018 #9
He's still a traitor..................another deflection for his treason turbinetree Jul 2018 #11
Twitter is still a business, and people post for free as guests on their platform. forgotmylogin Jul 2018 #12
Twitter is a private corporation NewJeffCT Jul 2018 #13
Pretty sure he bans people on his Twitter page? titaniumsalute Jul 2018 #17
Bc normal (nonTrumpeters) people don't post fake and abusive content Snellius Jul 2018 #20
No, it's only a big deal when it happens to them on twitter. haele Jul 2018 #22
Fine, the Orange Monon can delete his account. apnu Jul 2018 #23
He's right, they shouldn't shadow ban Republicans jmowreader Jul 2018 #24

Roy Rolling

(6,908 posts)
2. Not an Attorney
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 09:23 AM
Jul 2018

I'm not an attorney and didn't write this opinion, but I think the legality of this issue was settled in the case of Boo v. Hoo.

Crutchez_CuiBono

(7,725 posts)
3. He shouldn't be bitching bc
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 09:23 AM
Jul 2018

he breaks the rules most everyday. Hopefully, they'll ban him. He acts like he owns everything.

riversedge

(70,084 posts)
5. Twitter Is Not 'Shadow Banning' Republicans New York Magazine
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 09:30 AM
Jul 2018





Twitter Is Not ‘Shadow Banning’ Republicans



http://nymag.com/selectall/2018/07/twitter-is-not-shadow-banning-republicans.html



July 25, 2018 4:36 pm
By Brian Feldman @bafeldman


The concept of the “shadowban” has existed practically since the inception of the web forum. The idea is simple: Instead of banning a user outright and informing them of such punishment, a shadowban makes a user’s post visible only to themselves. In other words, they think that they’re still part of a community, but nobody is able to see or interact with them. The shadowban is useful in that rather than someone immediately being locked out and possibly retaliating by, for example, making a new account, the user fades away gradually due to the lack of interaction from other users.

As forums have evolved into social-media platforms, the shadowban and its descendants have come along with them. Facebook argued that the best way to dispel misinformation from places like Infowars, which argues that the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting was a staged hoax, was to secretly minimize their distribution in the site’s News Feed — a similar but not identical tactic. I myself have previously argued — tongue in cheek — that Twitter should shadowban (or “hellban”) President Donald Trump, who most recently threatened a cataclysmic war against Iran. The idea being that he gets the feeling of communicating with his followers while his actual posts are hidden from the (volatile) world.

More than anywhere else, though, the shadowban has persisted among the conspiracy-minded, as a great weapon of censorship, generally thought to be perpetrated by liberal Silicon Valley operatives at the expense of conservatives. That right-wing voices are being “shadow banned” by Twitter and Facebook has become all but an article of faith among internet-native conservative activists and publishers — despite little evidence to support the claim.



It’s no surprise, then, that a Vice article claiming that Twitter is “shadow banning” Republicans has already taken hold in the minds of the most online right-wingers. At issue, though, is not “banning” but Twitter’s search mechanism. Usually, Twitter will automatically complete a search query and suggest an account when a user begins typing in Twitter’s search bar. If you type in “Donald,” for example, brings up Trump’s account as an easily accessible hyperlink, so that you don’t have to click through to the results page; if you type in “Hillary,” you’ll get a similar autocomplete suggestion of Hillary Clinton....................................



A quick search via google:




About 138,000 results (0.30 seconds)
Search Results
Story image for what is shadow banning from New York Magazine
Twitter Is Not 'Shadow Banning' Republicans
New York Magazine-16 hours ago
The concept of the “shadowban” has existed practically since the inception of the web forum. The idea is simple: Instead of banning a user ...
Republican feels 'victimized' by Twitter 'shadow banning'
The Hill-10 hours ago
Twitter 'Shadow Banning' Prominent Republicans
Highly Cited-National Review-18 hours ago
Twitter has placed 'shadow bans' on prominent Republicans: Report
In-Depth-Washington Times-17 hours ago
Twitter slammed for 'shadow banning' prominent Republicans
Highly Cited-Fox News-17 hours ago
EXCLUSIVE: GOP Rep. Gaetz Threatens Twitter With FEC Complaint ...
In-Depth-The Daily Caller-10 hours ago

lark

(23,061 posts)
14. Wonder if this is really about russian bots getting kicked out?
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 10:01 AM
Jul 2018

I know it really pissed him off when he lost millions of pro-drumpf posters in a few days. Of course none of these were real people, just russian fakes.

machoneman

(3,997 posts)
18. Yes I'd say. It's easy for small-minded wingers to make the connection...
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 10:17 AM
Jul 2018

between the huge loss of fake followers and now the shadow-banning issue which has been a conspiracy theory among all those home-schooled clowns for a long time now.

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
8. He violates their posted terms of service on literally a daily basis.
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 09:34 AM
Jul 2018

They should have really banned HIM ages ago.

sinkingfeeling

(51,438 posts)
9. How is it illegal? This is the same government that just shot down net
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 09:36 AM
Jul 2018

neutrality. The same party that has fought 'Government regulation' of private business for decades.

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
11. He's still a traitor..................another deflection for his treason
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 09:41 AM
Jul 2018

he just lies in bed every night, thinking of how to just whine and blame every one for his own misery that he creates for the next day.....................................

"Twitter “SHADOW BANNING” prominent Republicans. Not good. We will look into this discriminatory and illegal practice at once! Many complaints."


Your one to talk asshole...................your lackey the lying evangelical Sarah "Red Hen" Huckster and your bunch of traitors ..................have now thrown out a reporter from CNN..................I'm filing a complaint and discriminatory practice against traitors this coming November...........................so there.................ban your bunch forever into prison.................

November 2018 cannot get here fast enough...................vote


We need Paper Ballots.........

forgotmylogin

(7,520 posts)
12. Twitter is still a business, and people post for free as guests on their platform.
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 09:44 AM
Jul 2018

It is not illegal nor discriminatory to throttle people who abuse their platform rules and make their sponsors look bad.

Snellius

(6,881 posts)
20. Bc normal (nonTrumpeters) people don't post fake and abusive content
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 12:11 PM
Jul 2018

This shit news comes COMPLETELY from followers of the Bullshiter in Chief.

haele

(12,640 posts)
22. No, it's only a big deal when it happens to them on twitter.
Thu Jul 26, 2018, 12:20 PM
Jul 2018

Liberals and liberal subject searches are slowed down, put in time out, or banned all the time in Twitter.

According to spouse, who is big on twitter, one of the first ways you can tell a subject or poster is being reviewed or has been banned for content issues when the "hashtag auto fill" on a subject or person you've been posting on suddenly stops working.

And if you've been banned or are under review, it's made very, very clear to both you and everyone else.

Haele

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Claims Twitter Enga...