UPDATE: Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook will audit thousands of apps after breach of trust
Source: Washington Post
Mark Zuckerberg on Wednesday said Facebook will audit thousands of apps in response to the breach of trust created by Cambridge Analytica the chief executive's first comments since a crisis erupted Friday over data siphoned by the political marketing firm used by the Trump campaign.
In a post on his personal Facebook page, Zuckerberg said the company would investigate thousands of apps that used large amounts of data at the time. He said that Facebook will give users easier access to tools to manage how their data is being used and shared, and will further restrict developers' access to data to prevent abuse.
I started Facebook, and at the end of the day I'm responsible for what happens on our platform, he said. . . . While this specific issue involving Cambridge Analytica should no longer happen with new apps today, that doesn't change what happened in the past. We will learn from this experience to secure our platform further and make our community safer for everyone going forward.
Specifically he said the company will restrict the data that third-party developers can access to names, profile photos and email addresses, and will require developers to sign a contract before being allowed to ask Facebook users for rights to their posts. The company will post a new feature on the top of every Facebook users news feed with a list of the apps they have used and an easy way to revoke the apps access. The latter feature already exists in privacy settings, but Zuckerberg is promising to give it more prominence on the site.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/03/21/facebooks-mark-zuckerberg-in-first-response-to-cambridge-analytica-revelations-says-company-will-audit-thousands-of-apps/?utm_term=.90c3738a3fbc
Original Full Title: Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, in first response to Cambridge Analytica revelations, says company will audit thousands of apps
Original story -
This is a developing story. It will be updated.
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)"We're soooo sorry now we've been caught..."
titaniumsalute
(4,742 posts)All fluff. If he cared it would have been prevented in the first place. Plus he wouldn't have been selling ad time to the shady Russians to begin with last year. He's just a greedy fucking anti-American pig.
Raster
(20,998 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,011 posts)the stock market is he reluctantly crawling out of the shadows.
Leghorn21
(13,523 posts)...Well damn, how do you say Eat shit and die in Russian - ?
Botany
(70,476 posts)n/t
Leghorn21
(13,523 posts)Spasiba, mon ami(e)!!
Response to Botany (Reply #7)
RestoreAmerica2020 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Botany
(70,476 posts)Eat shit and die. The Trump campaign had people who were facebook employees
working full time at Trump's HQ and getting data and information from Cambridge
Analytica and wikileaks and they helped to weaponize that data/information for
the Trump campaign. Facebook was also being used by the Russians to data mine
information on Americans for Cambridge Analytica.
BTW you cashed the checks too.
MontanaMama
(23,297 posts)they didn't know about what CA was doing? Either Zuckerberg is lying or his company is inept or both.
Red Pest
(288 posts)My wife and I have never used Facebook and never intend to use it. We always felt that there was a strong likelihood that the loss of privacy was too great a risk. Whenever there is a choice between money and anything else, entrepreneurs like Mark Zuckerberg will always choose money.
SergeStorms
(19,190 posts)the second time I logged in there were over 100 people who wanted to be "my friends", only about 5 of whom I actually knew. I decided right then that Facebook was not for me, because I didn't want to be besieged with that crap every time I logged on. And before the Facebook "fans" tell me I can filter people out, and keep people from seeing my information, I never believed that for a moment. I deactivated my account (because I guess you can't really ever delete your information) and haven't logged back on since.
Facebook THIS, Zuckerberg!
BigmanPigman
(51,582 posts)parents, sister and brother in law, and their college age kid. I was raised to be skeptical (like the CA guy Wylie said on one of the videos this weekend). He doesn't not distrust people bit he believes "a healthy dose of skepticism is the best way to go through life".
sarge43
(28,941 posts)"we'll look into closing the barn door."
Liberalhammer
(576 posts)I deleted my account.
poboy2
(2,078 posts)Facebook and Cambridge Analytica worked side by side at a Trump campaign office in San Antonio
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210388760
ffr
(22,665 posts)https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-cambridge-analytica-lawsuits/facebook-cambridge-analytica-sued-in-u-s-by-users-over-data-harvesting-idUSKBN1GX1XK
Proof that illegal activity for any company only takes notice once money is involved.
Their problems have just started.
DeminPennswoods
(15,270 posts)If he allows users to restrict data and/or restricts use of the data, Facebook won't be attractive to developers or advertizers. If that happens, it doesn't make money.
The only way to keep making money is to keep selling Facebook's "product", it's users and their personal info.
LeftInTX
(25,201 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)Facebook, like the other internet monopolies, are all about feeding the wall street banksters, they are as useless as the banksters, don't make or produce a thing, worthless piece of shit.
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,825 posts)Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
AC_Mem This message was self-deleted by its author.
summer_in_TX
(2,727 posts)They need to be regulated. Does anyone trust them to police themselves? I don't think so.
Yavin4
(35,427 posts)Why can't Facebook do the same?
C_U_L8R
(44,996 posts)As they say, you are the company you keep. Broadcast and print media often curate who they'll accept as advertisers and what they can run. Maybe Facebook should wise up and be more selective.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Fuck him
Egnever
(21,506 posts)We never gave a crap about what they were doing with your data before...we will now trust us.
Pobeka
(4,999 posts)Think about it -- the user database is *the* tangible asset value of FB. You have attorney's, sysadmins, etc hired to protect that data. You don't just let it out of your hands, unless someone pays for it contractually.
At best Zuckerberg is being disingenuous, but I think he's flat out lying.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)F**k Facebook, F**k Zuckerberg!
Hugin
(33,100 posts)Cool story, bro.