Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Survivoreesta

(221 posts)
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 09:36 PM Jan 2012

Trial not likely for Jared Lee Loughner in 2012

PHOENIX - The mentally ill man charged in the Tucson shooting rampage that killed six people and wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and 12 others isn't expected to go to trial in 2012 as he continues to be forcibly medicated to make him psychologically fit to stand trial.

The case was put on hold indefinitely when psychologists diagnosed suspect Jared Lee Loughner with schizophrenia and a federal judge ruled the 23-year-old wasn't fit to stand trial in the shooting that occurred a year ago Sunday.

Loughner is being treated at a Missouri prison facility, where he has been forcibly medicated for more than five months with psychotropic drugs. Even though psychologists say his condition is improving, his lawyers have vigorously fought the government's efforts to medicate him.

Mike Black, a former federal defender who is now in private practice as a criminal defense attorney in Phoenix, believes it would take Loughner's lawyer a long time to prepare for a trial, if he is ever declared mentally fit.

Read more: http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_central_southern_az/tucson/trial-not-likely-for-jared-lee-loughner-in-2012#ixzz1ijS2Zgxt

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trial not likely for Jared Lee Loughner in 2012 (Original Post) Survivoreesta Jan 2012 OP
Loughner will plead insanity, and proceed to get away with murder. PuffedMica Jan 2012 #1
Loughner is clearly mentally ill. Spider Jerusalem Jan 2012 #7
TY Spider blaze Jan 2012 #9
He's completely out of his mind. There was never any evidence that he was a political terrorist. chrisa Jan 2012 #11
Mentally ill people are perfect targets for stochastic terrorism nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #18
One legally mentally ill is not one who "gets away with murder" treestar Jan 2012 #28
Where did the gun and assault clips come from? onehandle Jan 2012 #2
He bought them at a Sportsman's Warehouse in Tucson. hack89 Jan 2012 #3
BTW - you do know that "assault clip" is a made up and meaningless term. nt hack89 Jan 2012 #4
Follow the dead people. onehandle Jan 2012 #5
So lying is ok as long as it is for a good cause? What a shock. nt hack89 Jan 2012 #6
When I'm killing people, I want as many bullets as I can get. onehandle Jan 2012 #8
If you don't want a serious conservation just say so. nt hack89 Jan 2012 #13
No good reason to have such mags Blandocyte Jan 2012 #10
For many handguns the standard magazine is greater then 10 rounds. hack89 Jan 2012 #12
Ten is the lowcap mag available on Glock 19's. boppers Jan 2012 #19
All those pauses didn't save any lives at Virginia Tech hack89 Jan 2012 #23
But Meanwhile, Let's Make Sure The Mentally Ill Have Plenty Of Firearms. Paladin Jan 2012 #27
No - lets fully fund mental health. Lets do something in the realm of possible vice fantasy. hack89 Jan 2012 #29
Take It Back To Guns/RKBA, Where It'll Be Appreciated. (n/t) Paladin Jan 2012 #30
No - I don't think I will. hack89 Jan 2012 #32
No-one is advocating what you assert. PavePusher Jan 2012 #34
OK, Prove Me Wrong. Paladin Jan 2012 #35
Sorry but it's your duty to support your claims. PavePusher Jan 2012 #36
Our measures have led to historically low rates of gun violence hack89 Jan 2012 #41
The three round rule for shotguns only applies Drahthaardogs Jan 2012 #25
*sigh* boppers Jan 2012 #39
By civilian I am sure you are including law enforcement? pipoman Jan 2012 #14
What if you just had a gun for each hand? nt Snake Alchemist Jan 2012 #17
And one on each foot? boppers Jan 2012 #20
Most full size 9mm average about 15-16 per magazine. Snake Alchemist Jan 2012 #31
Yeah, I was guessing as to the origin of the suggested limit. boppers Jan 2012 #40
There is no good reason for many things Drahthaardogs Jan 2012 #24
Police first. PavePusher Jan 2012 #33
Do you realize pipoman Jan 2012 #15
I have a personal agenda? onehandle Jan 2012 #16
Reducing senseless deaths enabled by a pro-violence culture? boppers Jan 2012 #21
No way. I clearly want to ban guns, collect the existing ones, melt them down... onehandle Jan 2012 #22
LOL! Well played. boppers Jan 2012 #38
Thanks for the technically accurate 'tactical carbon fiber thumb grip.' onehandle Jan 2012 #42
Loughner: another tragic lesson on the importance of treating the mentally ill. aikoaiko Jan 2012 #26
+1 tawadi Jan 2012 #37

PuffedMica

(1,061 posts)
1. Loughner will plead insanity, and proceed to get away with murder.
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 09:42 PM
Jan 2012

Not a mention of his being influenced by the right wing hate media will be made at the trial.
 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
7. Loughner is clearly mentally ill.
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 04:23 PM
Jan 2012

Paranoid schizophrenia pretty much fits any criteria for "insanity"; sure, what he did was terrible, and the nature of his delusions may make him a threat to himself and others, but I'm not sure justice is best served by sentencing him to life in prison or execution rather than indefinitely commiting him to a maximum-security mental facility.

chrisa

(4,524 posts)
11. He's completely out of his mind. There was never any evidence that he was a political terrorist.
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 08:12 PM
Jan 2012

This is definitely someone that deserves to be in a mental institution.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
18. Mentally ill people are perfect targets for stochastic terrorism
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 04:29 AM
Jan 2012

not that our lovely media or prosecutors will connect THAT DOT... they might have to prosecute somebody and it is not Loughner, under conspiracy charges. In this country that be a first.

But Mr. Loughner is not well... and insanity is real in this case.

Of couse, this means he should spend the rest of his natural life in a hospital for the criminally insane... that is another story,

treestar

(82,383 posts)
28. One legally mentally ill is not one who "gets away with murder"
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 12:21 PM
Jan 2012

but is found not to have murdered due to not having the required mental state.

The question would be did he take any steps to indicate he knew it was wrong - anything he did to avoid getting caught, for example.

Blandocyte

(1,231 posts)
10. No good reason to have such mags
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 07:59 PM
Jan 2012

in civilian hands. Limit every civilian to 10-round mags. You'd just have to change the mag while you're shootin' them holes in paper. It doesn't take *that" long, and while you are reloading, if you're shooting folks, it gives sane people a chance to tackle you.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
12. For many handguns the standard magazine is greater then 10 rounds.
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 10:47 PM
Jan 2012

sounds like a round-about-way to ban popular hand guns. The Brady Bunch wouldn't be that duplicitous, would they?

Why 10? Why such an arbitrary number? Explain to me why that 11th round is so deadly?

boppers

(16,588 posts)
19. Ten is the lowcap mag available on Glock 19's.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 04:53 AM
Jan 2012

Maybe that's the reasoning? (Loughner used a Glock 19). It normally has 15 rounds, he used a 30 round mag+1, so he got off 31 shots, and had another 30 round clip, and two 15 round clips... 91 shots total.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/01/robert-farago/giffords-shooter-jared-loughner-used-a-glock-with-extended-clip/

Personally, I'd get rid of all these insane variants of legal patchwork for weapons and just apply the shotgun standard across the board. 3 shots before reloading, regardless of firearm, regardless of caliber, regardless of form factor, regardless of firing speed.... no more spray and pray. If you feel you *must* be able to fire more rounds, in rapid succession, get federally licensed, and be subject to mental health screening and extensive background checks.

"Explain to me why that 11th round is so deadly?"

It's not about the 11th round. It's about a pause before firing it.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
23. All those pauses didn't save any lives at Virginia Tech
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 10:11 AM
Jan 2012

Here is something to ponder - as all these guns have proliferated, gun violence has plunged to historic lows. You have never been safer.

The issue in Loughner's case is mental health. If we had a properly funded mental health system in America, do you think this shooting could have been prevented? Lets fix the real problems.

Paladin

(28,243 posts)
27. But Meanwhile, Let's Make Sure The Mentally Ill Have Plenty Of Firearms.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 12:19 PM
Jan 2012

You're not fooling anybody but yourself, here.

And a special shout-out on this occasion to one of your fellow DU Gun Enthusiasts, the one who posted a gripe about Gabby Gifford's voting record not being sufficiently pro-gun---said criticism being made within 24 hours of the Congresswoman's shooting. Stay classy, gun militants.....

hack89

(39,171 posts)
29. No - lets fully fund mental health. Lets do something in the realm of possible vice fantasy.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 12:29 PM
Jan 2012

you are the guys that are using a very rare event to advocate for the stripping of Constitutional rights from other Americans. You must have loved the Patriot Act - after all it was to make us all "safer".

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
34. No-one is advocating what you assert.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 03:00 PM
Jan 2012

The only person fooled here is... you.

And you can cite your claim, yes?

Paladin

(28,243 posts)
35. OK, Prove Me Wrong.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 03:59 PM
Jan 2012

What proactive measures does the gun rights movement advocate which would prevent even a portion of such bloodbaths in the future? What have you got, besides pie-in-the-sky notions of taking care of the mentally ill (Where's the money coming from? How many years before aid measures get past the Republicans and are implemented?), or everybody arming themselves and embracing full-scale Law Of The Jungle behavior? Gun activists readily accept things like the Arizona massacre as a fair price for (somebody else) to pay, in return for having access to as many and as varied a selection of firearms as possible. Daily proof of this sick attitude is available on the DU Gun Control/RKBA group.....

hack89

(39,171 posts)
41. Our measures have led to historically low rates of gun violence
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 06:08 PM
Jan 2012

you have never been safer and next year you will be even safer - even you have to admit we are on the right track.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
25. The three round rule for shotguns only applies
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 11:17 AM
Jan 2012

in waterfowl hunting. Most pumps and semi-autos hold four in the magazine (assuming a 3-inch 12 guage firing 3-inch shells). You have to plug the gun to make sure the magazine will only hold two rounds.

Most guys I know take their plugs out for turkey hunting.


A gun smith should have known that.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
39. *sigh*
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:25 PM
Jan 2012

1. Doves are not waterfowl. Hint: Waterfowl isn't relevant. Migrating birds is.
2. Yes, all weapons can be modified to be "non-standard" (long clips, rotating magazines, reciprocal firing systems, etc), I was advocating for a standard.
3. Yes, you can pull a plug. That is, of course, *totally* missing the point I was making.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
20. And one on each foot?
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 04:56 AM
Jan 2012

A ten round clip, in each hand, would be 20 rounds. Loughner emptied 31 rounds in seconds, with one hand, before pausing to reload.

 

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)
31. Most full size 9mm average about 15-16 per magazine.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 01:30 PM
Jan 2012

10 round magazines would be more common in .45 pistols and compact 9mm.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
24. There is no good reason for many things
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 11:14 AM
Jan 2012

Let's put governors on all cars so they cannot go over 75 mph.

Let's re-instate prohibition.

Let's outlaw cigarettes and snuff.



As a dog trainer, this argument reminds me of the people who always sneer when I break out the electronic collar and say "You are going to SHOCK my dog?". To which I reply "It is a training device, and a very good one in the right hands. It the wrong hands, it is a torture device, but then again so is a leash, a heeling stick, and even a leather collar. If a person is an idiot, they will find a way to everything bad even it is mostly good. It is why they are idiots".

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
15. Do you realize
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 12:02 AM
Jan 2012

how incredibly unconscionable it is to use people you don't know and to use their tragedy for some sort of justification of your own very personal agenda? I'm sure you really don't care.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
21. Reducing senseless deaths enabled by a pro-violence culture?
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 06:28 AM
Jan 2012

Such deaths facilitated by people who treat weapons as toys to play with, or have fun with, rather than objects of violence to be treated with fear and reverence?

Am I close?

People who have "fun" shooting at targets should be treated the same way as people who have "fun" disemboweling creatures.

I am proficient with quite a few firearms, having grown up with a gunsmith father, *and* I grew up on a farm, so yeah, I can disembowel just about most mammals and avian creatures, and clean and rebuild a wide variety of firearms, as well.

...but anybody who actually enjoys doing either, well, yeah, that's a pretty big signal of something *possibly* being very wrong in their head.

Consider this: A Gun nut vs. a Shovel nut. Both are tools. Both are common (the tool, not the nut).

Do you know shovel nuts who worry about their shovel's finish?
Do you know shovel nuts who obsess about who made their shovels?
Do you know shovel nuts who collect shovels? Do they have more than 10 shovels?
Do you know shovel nuts who argue for a right to attach items to their shovels, in order to "enhance" their shovel?
Do you know shovel nuts who can't wait to go somewhere, and practice shoveling all day?
Do you know shovel nuts who fear the loss, or tracking, of their shovels?

Yeah.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
22. No way. I clearly want to ban guns, collect the existing ones, melt them down...
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 10:08 AM
Jan 2012

...and use the metals to build the worlds largest drum circle bandstand for peace.

Living in the deep South, I've never even seen a gun much less fired one.

Now excuse me. I have to go polish my shovel collection.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
38. LOL! Well played.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 05:03 PM
Jan 2012

Hey, have you seen that new shovel handle mod with the tactical carbon fiber thumb grip?

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
42. Thanks for the technically accurate 'tactical carbon fiber thumb grip.'
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 07:18 PM
Jan 2012

The 'shovel grabbers' out there just call it an 'assault grip.'

They're just showing their ignorance.

aikoaiko

(34,163 posts)
26. Loughner: another tragic lesson on the importance of treating the mentally ill.
Sun Jan 8, 2012, 11:48 AM
Jan 2012

Most schizophrenics are harmless to others, but there is a small percentage of them and others who suffer from mental disorders who need intervention badly to keep them from harming others or themselves.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trial not likely for Jare...