The New Yorker Fires Star Reporter Ryan Lizza Over Improper Sexual Conduct
Source: Daily Beast
The New Yorker has let go of its star reporter Ryan Lizza amid allegations of sexual misconduct, the magazine confirmed Monday.
The New Yorker recently learned that Ryan Lizza engaged in what we believe was improper sexual conduct. We have reviewed the matter and, as a result, have severed ties with Lizza, a spokesperson for the magazine said. Due to a request for privacy, we are not commenting further.
In a separate statement, Lizza disputed the magazines description of his firing: I am dismayed that The New Yorker has decided to characterize a respectful relationship with a woman I dated as somehow inappropriate. The New Yorker was unable to cite a company policy that was violated.
He continued: I am sorry to my friends, workplace colleagues, and loved ones for any embarrassment this episode may have caused. I love The New Yorker, my home for the last decade, and I have the highest regard for the people who work there. But this decision, which was made hastily and without a full investigation of the relevant facts, was a terrible mistake.
Read more: https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-new-yorker-severs-ties-with-star-reporter-ryan-lizza
Lonestarblue
(9,958 posts)I love the New Yorker and subscribe. There are so many incidents coming to light that they leave me reeling. I hope we learn more. Is this more of the Al Franken type accusations, which I believe may have been annoying to the women involved but should not have led to his resignation, or are these serious issues of real harassment? If we do not distinguish between what is serious and what is trivial, fairly soon every action will be perceived as trivial, and that does a real disservice to the women who suffer actual injury. I spent my career in corporate America, and while Im sure my unspoken language communicated that I would not tolerate any man who overstepped the bounds, some women are not comfortable with any confrontation. We need to teach young girls and women that their bodies are their own, and they need to make that clear.
Me.
(35,454 posts)Passed around by female journalists this fall of men who are an issue
PSPS
(13,579 posts)SergeStorms
(19,186 posts)a link where I could examine those accusations and supporting facts? I'd like to read them. Thanks in advance.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,222 posts)wasn't there. Anthony Brooks was filling in because apparently Ashbrook has been placed on leave following sexual misconduct allegations.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)The firm noted that the accuser would like their identity to remain confidential.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-new-yorker-severs-ties-with-star-reporter-ryan-lizza
SergeStorms
(19,186 posts)"confidential accuser". Another man denied Due Process, and now his career is permanently scarred. Don't get me wrong, if he indeed committed an act of sexual aggression/impropriety then his employment should be terminated at once.
However, the very nature of #MeToo might be used as a method to settle old emotional scores . I would certainly hate for that to happen, especially when so much weight is being afforded 'anonymous' accusers.
I hope this never reaches the bottom of that barrel.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Just to us.
Victim-shaming in multiple ways, including putting their name out for the abuse and innuendo we know will follow, is just another way to keep them silent.
Losing your job because you are a rude, crude asshole who has no respect for females - that is an everyday event!
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)As Due Process is a 5th Amendment clause ensuring a legal obligation of the state, it begs the question... which court denied this man that?
Or is your usage simply an informal fallacy predicated on emotion rather than critical thought... because "I hope this never reaches the bottom of that barrel."
SergeStorms
(19,186 posts)I'm a sexist pig who has absolutely no respect for women whatsoever. That both of you fail to see, or even worse, don't want to see the point being made here is all I need to know. Buh-bye
BeyondGeography
(39,347 posts)This is supposed to be a big deal?
George II
(67,782 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,347 posts)Thats what happened to Lizza because, if all we go on is whats being reported, one persons word is being taken as the truth over his.
PSPS
(13,579 posts)This is a private matter and we're not entitled to all the facts known to those making the decision. I have faith in the New Yorker making the right decision because they know all the facts.
BeyondGeography
(39,347 posts)His accuser retains her privacy; his career, or this phase of it at least, ends in public disgrace. I have no feelings for him, but they better have something pretty damned good if its to be at all commensurate with the fallout. Meantime, whats he supposed to do, curl up in a ball and die somewhere? He has to fight back because his life is at stake.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)If an accusation from just one woman can get someone fired, then it seems to me that we've crossed a line.
I have plenty of empathy for all girls and women who have experienced all manner of abuse and degrading behavior from men. I am a survivor of two attempted rapes, uncounted incidences of sexual coercion, males yelling obscenities at me from passing cars (starting at age 11) - in other words, pretty much the whole panoply of what most females go through in this male-dominated culture.
Even so, I am not willing to just unquestioningly believe every woman who brings accusations against a particular man. Due in part to the fact, I suppose, that I know from experience that it's not impossible to escape or de-escalate in difficult sexual situations.
I'm just not willing to see men randomly punished for being male. Maybe because I'm the mother or two sons.
PSPS
(13,579 posts)If the New Yorker is known for anything, it's its fact checking. They would never have done this if it weren't justified. Contrary to what many have come to believe from "TV shows," The public at large is not entitled to all the facts that are in the hands of those making these decisions. It's a private matter.
SergeStorms
(19,186 posts)on making it a public matter? Why are headlines splashed all over the media? There's absolutely no reason to go public with this if - indeed - they have all the "facts" that we're not privy to. If it's private on the accuser's end, the entire subject should be private. Someone wants this man's reputation and career destroyed, don't you think? But we're not entitled to know why? If we're not, then keep the matter in house and out of the media.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"If an accusation from just one woman can get someone fired..."
What specifically leads you to believe the consequences are predicated on accusations alone, rather than in addition to a thorough investigation by the company?
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and it's still far from over