Brazile: I found 'no evidence' Democratic primary was rigged
Source: Politico
By CRISTIANO LIMA
11/05/2017 10:21 AM EST
Updated 11/05/2017 11:11 AM EST
Donna Brazile, the former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee, said Sunday she found "no evidence" that the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged in favor of eventual nominee Hillary Clinton, seemingly walking back her recent stinging criticisms of the electoral process.
"I found no evidence, none whatsoever" that the primaries were rigged, Brazile said during an appearance on ABC's "This Week."
Last week, a scathing excerpt from Brazile's upcoming book, "Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House," published in POLITICO Magazine, detailed what Brazile described as an "unethical" agreement between the Clinton campaign and the committee that she claims allowed the Democratic candidate to exert "control of the party long before she became its nominee."
.................................
The remarks were widely interpreted as a blunt accusation of favoritism by the former interim DNC chair, though she stopped short of saying the actual voting process was rigged. But Brazile appeared to temper her claims Sunday, disputing the characterization of the process as being rigged to favor Clinton over Sanders.
......................................
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/05/donna-brazile-rigged-democrats-clinton-sanders-244566
the bad comments went around the world. Now she says this!

Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Decree that.
dhol82
(9,523 posts)Too little, too late.
FarPoint
(13,877 posts)" No One"....
onit2day
(1,201 posts)She commented that noting illegal was done merely unethical in the way funding was distributed. She states funding was distributed like it always has been only a year early. Normally once we have a candidate then control of party funding all goes to get that candidate elected. It happens after the primary and a candidate is chosen. Since no one expected Clinton would be seriously challenged the DNC just wanted to get a jump on the race and pretty much gave control of funding and control to the Clinton campaign, ignoring the Sanders campaign. It should have been equally distributed if given at all before the primary was concluded. It wasn't. Sanders was excluded and all control was thrown to the Clinton campaign as if she had no challenger at all. Like I said it should not be done and it never is done this way until after the primary has concluded and we have a candidate. Bernie was cheated. It wasn't fair and won't be done again. Accept it and let it go. Brazille pointed it out so it would not be repeated and there would not continue to be a denial or cover up. We can move on united behind our FDR principles as being the party of the people and the working man, not the bankstesr or corporations or wall street lobbyists
dhol82
(9,523 posts)published after the upcoming elections. This has just given republicans a topic they can use to tar our candidates and sow dissent among us.
Sorry, I dont think, if she had these issues, that she did it the right way.
roomtomove
(238 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)If you don't like the rules, get them changed. Just don't cry about it afterwards like you didn't know the rules to begin with. Clinton won the Primary by some 3 1/2 million votes anyways.
roomtomove
(238 posts)I was fighting in the streets before you were born my child, against backroom politics and other things, so please don't lecture me.
sandensea
(22,850 posts)No nominating process will ever be free of widespread suspicions of rigging as long as a few hundred people can have as much (or more) of a say than 30 million+ Democratic primary/caucus voters.
Said luminaries should be given a chance to endorse a candidate, and of course the DNC should try to make sure the voters know who endorsed whom - but that's it.
Until we get there, these things will always have a cloud of suspicion - unfounded or not.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)You confuse my laying out facts with your own condescension.
herding cats
(19,659 posts)Too little, too late.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)James Carville in some lobbing deal.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Tell the story but never become a part of it. The backlash speaks for itself.
Goodbye Donna. Happy retirement.
Glorfindel
(10,081 posts)Maybe she's a reanimated corpse. Who knows?
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Effect on her speaker fees. Go to hell Donna. Go to hell.
SergeStorms
(19,502 posts)I think a full page apology in the New York Times to someone would go a long way in starting the healing.
NBachers
(18,385 posts)Picking up speed on the way down the Slide to Irrelevance.
Akoto
(4,289 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)CRISTIANO LIMA
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)I pre-ordered from Amazon.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Trump LOVED it, so did freakrepublic and the rest of the reich wing.
You are dead to me Donna Brazile.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)think is going to buy her book? I wouldn't give her the time of day.
Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)just to see the story fizzle out like this....?