Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,290 posts)
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 04:47 PM Oct 2017

Treasury Department sides with Wall Street, against federal consumer watchdog agency on arbitration

Source: Washington Post

Treasury Department sides with Wall Street, against federal consumer watchdog agency on arbitration rule

By Renae Merle October 23 at 2:02 PM

In a highly unusual move, the Trump administration on Monday attacked a rule proposed by one of its own agencies. ... The intergovernmental fight pits regulators appointed by President Trump — Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and acting comptroller of the currency Keith Noreika — against one of the few Obama administration appointees remaining — Richard Cordray, the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

It is not unusual for such regulators to disagree, but rarely do those squabbles spill out into public view. The Trump administration has made unwinding many of the regulations put in place following the Great Recession a top priority, arguing that eliminating cumbersome rules would spark economic growth. But Cordray has repeatedly been a stumbling block in some key areas.

The regulation at the center of the fight addresses the fine print in many of the agreements that consumers sign when they apply for credit cards or bank accounts. These agreements typically require them to settle any disputes they have with the company through arbitration, in which a third party rules on the matter, rather than going to court or joining a class-action lawsuit.

The rule approved by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a watchdog agency, would block mandatory arbitration clauses, allowing more people to file or join a lawsuit to press their complaints. ... The new measure is widely loathed on Wall Street, which has estimated it would cost them billions of dollars, and among Republicans in Congress, who call it a gift to plaintiffs' attorneys.
....

Renae Merle covers white collar crime and Wall Street for The Washington Post. Follow @renaemerle

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/10/23/treasury-department-sides-with-wall-street-opposes-elimination-of-mandatory-arbitration-clauses/



Shocking, I know.

* * * * *

Retweeted by David Fahrenthold: https://twitter.com/fahrenthold

Treasury Department sides with Wall Street, against federal consumer watchdog agency on arbitration rule


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Treasury Department sides with Wall Street, against federal consumer watchdog agency on arbitration (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2017 OP
Trump voters who work as greeters at Walmart dont want protection Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #1
ok everyone show shock and surprise vlyons Oct 2017 #2
Wasnt going to post the same thing! Im so shocked!! Docreed2003 Oct 2017 #7
Lol. Yes, conspiracy to transfer wealth and power to Hortensis Oct 2017 #8
TRUMP! Because.. thinking is hard.. vkkv Oct 2017 #3
"arguing that eliminating cumbersome rules would spark economic growth" DBoon Oct 2017 #4
and crash the economy again while they're at it mdbl Oct 2017 #6
Because, you know, privileged criminals just should not be accountable and have to pay up. coolsandy Oct 2017 #5

Eliot Rosewater

(31,106 posts)
1. Trump voters who work as greeters at Walmart dont want protection
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 04:49 PM
Oct 2017

from the corps and employers who are destroying their lives.

They dont.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
8. Lol. Yes, conspiracy to transfer wealth and power to
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 06:17 PM
Oct 2017

a kleptocratic class on track. When we've had enough, will we allow them to keep 80 acres and 2 mules, minus those we send to prison of course, or take off their heads? Only figuratively speaking, of course, but I'm getting angrier all the time.

How dare they?! There are 330 million of us. Is it ballsiness combined with contempt, greed and stupidity or just incredibly ignorant contempt combined with greed and stupidity?

DBoon

(22,340 posts)
4. "arguing that eliminating cumbersome rules would spark economic growth"
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 05:16 PM
Oct 2017

Translation:

"We could become even more obscenely wealthy if we didn't have to follow the law"

mdbl

(4,973 posts)
6. and crash the economy again while they're at it
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 05:45 PM
Oct 2017

that way the average US citizen can plunge deeper in debt and become penniless.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Treasury Department sides...