Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 04:09 PM Oct 2017

Devin Nunes Went Rogue to Find Out Who Paid for Trump-Russia Dossier, Firm Claims

Source: The Daily Beast




Fusion GPS asked a judge to block a subpoena from the Republican who claimed to step aside from the investigation. His colleagues were allegedly left in the dark.

JUSTIN MILLER
SPENCER ACKERMAN
10.21.17 11:55 AM ET

Rep. Devin Nunes, the House intelligence committee chairman who claimed to have stepped aside from the panel’s Russia probe, appears to still be unilaterally carrying out a shadow investigation of his own.

On Friday, the firm behind the dossier alleging Donald Trump’s campaign engaged in a conspiracy with Russia to win the election — and that he witnessed “golden showers” in Moscow — claimed in a federal court filing that Nunes subpoenaed its bank for financial records “that would reveal the identities of Fusion’s clients.” Fusion asked a judge to stop the bank from complying with the subpoena.

Nunes’s subpoena appears to have caught at least some fellow members of the House intel committee off guard. According to a knowledgeable source, Nunes, a Republican, left several House intelligence committee members in the dark about his subpoena of Fusion. It is unclear if committee Republicans signed off or knew about Nunes’ Fusion GPS subpoena. A source familiar with the investigation told The Daily Beast that committee Democrats only learned of it from reading about it in the press.

“The subpoena is a blatant attempt to chill both speech with which Mr. Nunes disagrees and the free association of Americans working on a campaign against Donald Trump,” Fusion argues, adding it would violate the firm’s and its clients First Amendment rights.

Read more: https://www.thedailybeast.com/fusion-gps-claims-devin-nunes-went-rogue-to-find-out-who-paid-for-steele-dossier

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Devin Nunes Went Rogue to Find Out Who Paid for Trump-Russia Dossier, Firm Claims (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2017 OP
Wurmtongue got his instructions from Saruman.... Thomas Hurt Oct 2017 #1
Putin has something on him JI7 Oct 2017 #2
Or maybe Putin has something on tRump & tRump has something on Nunes. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2017 #4
Yeah. There is something he is scared of. Remember he was one the transition JI7 Oct 2017 #6
Don't forget,Nunes has or had a Wellstone ruled Oct 2017 #5
Somebody has something on him. The man has permanent flop-sweat. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2017 #9
Repubs want to know who's the Republican group that ordered the expert PI vetting on 'the donald' Sunlei Oct 2017 #3
Who has the authority over Nunes? BigmanPigman Oct 2017 #7
Speaker Ryan holds the authority DonViejo Oct 2017 #8
Oh shit! BigmanPigman Oct 2017 #10
This bastard needs to be investigated To. The. Hilt. lastlib Oct 2017 #15
Kick red dog 1 Oct 2017 #11
It is known that first a republican hired fusion and Linda Ed Oct 2017 #12
"Who hired fusion" is a distraction argument Merlot Oct 2017 #13
That's true for all "cui bono?" and "follow the money" claims. Igel Oct 2017 #14
Yes I believe you're right about Jeb Bush FakeNoose Oct 2017 #17
k for visibility riversedge Oct 2017 #16

JI7

(89,240 posts)
6. Yeah. There is something he is scared of. Remember he was one the transition
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 04:50 PM
Oct 2017

Team which kicked out christie and his people and put in putin people.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
5. Don't forget,Nunes has or had a
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 04:49 PM
Oct 2017

Russian investor in his Wine Business. Some Guy who owns or controls a Liquor Distributorship . Under stand it went South.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
3. Repubs want to know who's the Republican group that ordered the expert PI vetting on 'the donald'
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 04:44 PM
Oct 2017

Good thing a D got ahold of it short time before the election, turned dossier over to the authorities.

Republicans kept that information secret for 2? years, didn't tell their VOTERS and didn't tell quite a few of their fellow Republicans.

BigmanPigman

(51,567 posts)
7. Who has the authority over Nunes?
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 05:13 PM
Oct 2017

How can he be kicked off of the committee permanently since this is not the first time he has broken the rules and has not stepped aside?

lastlib

(23,152 posts)
15. This bastard needs to be investigated To. The. Hilt.
Sun Oct 22, 2017, 11:24 AM
Oct 2017

He's dirty. Dirtier than dirt! Someone owns him, is pulling his strings, and I'll bet that someone is either Russian or tRumpfenstain. (more likely Russian.) We need to know who!

Linda Ed

(493 posts)
12. It is known that first a republican hired fusion and
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 05:58 PM
Oct 2017

I believe it was Jeb Bush. JMHO

According to news reports, that client is a major GOP donor who was adamantly opposed to Trump. They reportedly hired Fusion GPS in Sept. 2015 and paid the Washington, D.C.-based firm nearly $1 million to investigate Trump.

Glenn Simpson, the co-founder of Fusion GPS and a former Wall Street Journal reporter, isn’t saying. A BBC reporter who had been in contact with Fusion GPS prior to the election reported back in January that a Jeb Bush donor was Fusion’s first client. But the reporter corrected the article after being contacted by Mike Murphy, the chairman of Bush’s super PAC, Right to Rise.

It will come out am sure as everything does eventually. Mueller may know who it was and is just not saying.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
13. "Who hired fusion" is a distraction argument
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 07:18 PM
Oct 2017

No matter who hired them, it's the information (which is being proven true more and more each day) that is important.

It's like when people argue over whether climate change is man made. That argument has taken up so much space because it's easier to fight than whether or not it's happening. To much evidence that it is happening. Like the dossier, to much evidence.

Igel

(35,274 posts)
14. That's true for all "cui bono?" and "follow the money" claims.
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:20 PM
Oct 2017

It's true for all "who funded the research" claims, as well.

Strictly speaking, it's the information that matters. Call that "Option A."

At the same time, there's often a desire on the part of a consultant to give the client what he wants--shading evidence, using not quite reliable evidence, leading out exculpatory evidence or context--so the information that you get might not be entirely trustworthy. Let's call that "option B."

Many decide for option A or option B, with little middle ground, and often choose that based on whether they want to believe the evidence or need to make the evidence go away.

Both option A and option B are always true.

FakeNoose

(32,579 posts)
17. Yes I believe you're right about Jeb Bush
Mon Oct 23, 2017, 12:13 AM
Oct 2017

I seem to recall reading it somewhere last year, around the time of the election. (maybe one of the Gawker blogs)

Gawker and Buzzfeed were reporting the Steele report last November - I'm sure it was before the election. I wasn't on DU at the time, but I remember being infuriated that the "regular" mainstream news media were all ignoring the story.

Meanwhile they all jumped on the bandwagon over Comey's leaked story concerning nothing about Hillary's emails.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Devin Nunes Went Rogue to...