Supreme Court to hear potentially landmark case on partisan gerrymandering

every time I think of what we could gain with just this case. However, if we lose, it just means this particular path to needed improvement is closed off, until revisited in another era.

Gerrymandering itself will continue either way since it does serve important functions, and in both cases the 2020 census will of course still be an enormous factor of course.

"Kennedy said he could envision a successful challenge “where a state enacts a law that has the purpose and effect of subjecting a group of voters or their party to disfavored treatment.” What was elusive, Kennedy said, was “a manageable standard by which to measure the effect of the apportionment and so to conclude that the state did impose a burden or restriction on the rights of a party’s voters.”

"Former president Barack Obama has said that one of his post-presidency projects will be to combat partisan gerrymanders after the 2020 Census."

I hope they resolve this complex issue fairly.

In Congressional District 6. It encompasses 8 different towns, but mostly only PARTS of those towns. Primarily it leaves out the black and Hispanic areas of the same towns for other districts. The top of district 6 is a very populous area, while the middle and bottom of it is completely rural.

It's absolutely nonsense. There is no reason (logically) why the district would be drawn this way EXCEPT to ensure it stays republican.

If gerrymandering ended in Texas, then without a doubt, Texas would turn blue and ultimately change the entire national landscape of politics in America (electoral college).

This is a big deal.

http://www.chron.com/news/politics/texas/article/This-is-how-badly-Republicans-have-gerrymandered-6246509.php#photo-7107651

Long but narrow (only a mile wide at one point) coastal district. It no longer exists. It was ridiculous.

Our Congressman is the highest paid congressman in Texas from NRA contributions and District 6 was the epicenter of the Open Carry Movement a few years ago. I wouldn't put a left-leaning bumper sticker on my car if you paid me to, (personal safety).

It snakes through 5 counties trying to pick up R votes in the blue/purple/light red rim counties N, NW, and W of Philly. Before this gerrymandering, this was Joe Sestak's district (Democrat).

Last week a group announced that they were taking the PA Congressional gerrymandering to court (cases had happened back in 2011 for the state legislative districts that had to be partially redrawn). At issue - the state voter registration is 51% Democrat and 49% Republican yet the Congressional delegation is 13 GOP and 5 Democrat due to the gerrymandering.

Gerrymandering is bad even if it could benefit us. Usually it doesn't though.

That's a lovely shaped district they made.

Arnold Porter is a great firm. That will be a fun case to watch

of the country and hopefully the courts will have the common sense to order the people that are setting up the districts to knock it off.

I do not think that CD 6 is one of the districts that will be involved but I will check

There are only 2 districts I believe, both near the boarder.

The three main districts involved in the July 10 trial are CD 27, CD 23 and CD 35. In addition, there was a finding of intentional discrimination for Dallas that could put some of these districts into play

We would be in much better shape with a 5-4 SOTUS majority.

They still have a goal of a permanent Republican majority. And now they have the courts to back them up.

I wouldn't have much hope of anything changing soon now.

gosuck to earn his keep.

Sincerely hope I'm wrong.

But don't count on them LISTENING.

Time to bring out the big guns!

(so to speak)

Didn't the Voting Rights Act require gerrymandering to ensure majority minority districts?

Mike Pompeo and now that lacky in a special election, Ron Estes. Before that Democrat Dan Glickman was elected over and over.