NBC News chairman praises Lauer for forum moderator performance
Source: The Hill
The chairman of NBC News had nothing but high marks for "Today" anchor Matt Lauers performance as moderator of Wednesdays presidential "Commander-in-Chief Forum."
"Against all odds we were able to bring the two presidential nominees together for the first time and presented an important examination of what each would bring to the role of Commander-in-Chief," Andrew Lack, who also serves as MSNBC chairman, wrote in an internal staff note.
...
Lack also praised the ratings generated by the event, which outpaced nine of the Republican presidential primary debates and all but one from the Democratic side.
Matt did a tremendous job driving one of the most serious discussions to date on these topics. Nearly 15 million people watched the event, and over 26 million tuned in at some point during the hour."
Read more: http://thehill.com/media/295235-nbc-news-chairman-praises-lauer-for-forum-moderator-performance
Unbelievable.
Chakab
(1,727 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)Source: CNN
NBC News knows the "Commander-in-Chief Forum" was not Matt Lauer's finest hour.
One executive, speaking anonymously, was blunt about it: "Disaster."
The day after Lauer's back-to-back interviews of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, several high ranking sources at the network said they hear the criticism and agree with at least some of it.
Even his internal defenders acknowledge flaws in the forum's production.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/08/media/nbc-news-forum-trump-clinton-postmortem/index.html
PSPS
(13,580 posts)riversedge
(70,089 posts)TeamPooka
(24,209 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)gordianot
(15,234 posts)Media captains are not that honorable.
spiderpig
(10,419 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Anchor spot on election night. She's better than he and more credible
Democat
(11,617 posts)Clinton needs to be very careful. They are openly promoting Trump and bashing Clinton.
Granny M
(1,395 posts)is that he's also the boss of Lester Holt, the first debate moderator. I hope Holt has the backbone to stand up to him and moderate fairly.
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)Surely, you jest, Granny.
Granny M
(1,395 posts)Trying to hold on to the last shred of nerve, here....
Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)when upper management told them exactly how it was going to be. There was probably an enormous picture of the Cheeto hanging on the wall above them. Remember, after all, that his long-running hit TV show The Apprentice was on NBC.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Granny M
(1,395 posts)My last feeble hope is that the Clinton campaign is aware and preparing.
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)"Mr Trump, can you spell cat? The first two letters are C and A."
"Secretary Clinton, explain in detail your plan for destroying ISIS within your first 30 minutes in office, and why the American people should vote for a liar like you?"
phylny
(8,368 posts)C Moon
(12,209 posts)I'm so tired of these news corporations: listening to corporate media news is like reading the back of a cereal box.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)the best solution is to turn them off.
BumRushDaShow
(128,509 posts)Hey! There used to be cool stuff on the back of cereal boxes!
BumRushDaShow
(128,509 posts)Demit
(11,238 posts)The story properly calls him chairman. When the sex of the officeholder isn't known, that's when you use the genderless "chairperson." Otherwise it's either chairman or chairwoman.
niyad
(113,074 posts)gender-neutral language seem to bother you so much?
we fought the gender-neutral battles for a long time, because we all know the power of gender-based words.
Demit
(11,238 posts)I'm all for gender-neutral language when it makes sense. I'm also all for acknowledging when a man is a man and a woman is a woman. Using a gender-neutral term in this case (when the identity of the chairperson is known) is kind of silly. It is needlessly overcompensating.
niyad
(113,074 posts)basis, and have for decades. again, I ask, WHY does gender neutral language upset you?
Demit
(11,238 posts)Doesn't make it upset me just because you repeat a question.
niyad
(113,074 posts)C Moon
(12,209 posts)I probably shouldn't have emphasized the word. Don't know why I did.
niyad
(113,074 posts)C Moon
(12,209 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)I said this the other day--"Let the word go forth...."
This is why everyone on MSNBC was parroting the "That asshole did a good job" routine.
You say what the boss wants you to say, or you Don't Get Paid.
pwb
(11,252 posts)Wake up media, nobody is watching. Your on your way out if you don't change real soon.
tavernier
(12,369 posts)So of course he is touting it as a success or HIS boss will start asking questions.
Here's the secret... the biggest bosses are the public and the sponsors, and if we refuse to watch their crap and buy their products, they will go away. Matt Lauer has come close to pissing off the public several times that resulted in lost ratings, so it is possible.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)to the issues and then let the audience Vets ask their questions. In 30 mins there was time for only two Veterans questions.
The Clinton issue was the emails, especially classified. She had the time to make the statement, classified information she worked with was always on a different server.
An hour (30 mins each) was to short, I wish each had to answer questions for a couple hours. Clintons been 'stress tested' for several hours of 'questions' many times. Trump never.
Coolest Ranger
(2,034 posts)I been expecting them to come to his defense
rurallib
(62,387 posts)the boys at Comcast were very, very happy
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Yup the MSM can't wait till Trump is elected with their help because...good ratings make a theocratic fascist state OK kids!
turbinetree
(24,683 posts)When you look at the history of the above people that are running the news, not one of them and I mean this, not one of them worked at doing any reporting, just maybe they should quit worrying about shareholder value and take a lesson from this "reporter, JOURNALIST" and how he reported on a issue during my time frame, this man also started a fund to memorialize the deaths of war correspondents.
The first question out of Matt's mouth to the dumpster should have been, if he (dumpster) could explain to everyone the "five medical deferments" he got for a bone spur during the Vietnam time frame, and whcih leg or foot it was, since now its being reported you don't know---------------really.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)The fairness Doctrine .
underpants
(182,627 posts)They have too much invested in Lauer
lark
(23,065 posts)That's what this appears to be saying. Either that, or they are just trying to cover up the apparent bribery.
niyad
(113,074 posts)trueblue2007
(17,194 posts)can't find the video
trueblue2007
(17,194 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,140 posts)Couldn't be happier.
GoCubsGo
(32,075 posts)"I screwed up and gave the job to a guy who had no business having it"? Yeah. Right.
llmart
(15,533 posts)If there hadn't been so much negative feedback about his crappy performance, this jackass wouldn't have had to make this statement.
I am so glad I no longer watch TV news. It's better for my stress levels. Also, I honestly don't know one person who was talking about this event the next day.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)to me and how biased it was in favor of don the con. No secret, that.