Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 07:07 AM Jul 2016

Tony Blair could face contempt of parliament motion over Iraq war

Source: The Guardian

Tony Blair could face a motion of contempt in the House of Commons over the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which the Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, has said he would probably support.

Conservative MP David Davis, backed by the SNP’s Alex Salmond, has said he will present on Thursday the motion, which accuses the former prime minister of misleading parliament . MPs could debate the issue before the summer if it is accepted by the Speaker, John Bercow.
...
Davis said: “It’s a bit like contempt of court, essentially by deceit. If you look just at the debate alone, on five different grounds the House was misled, three in terms of the weapons of mass destruction, one in terms of the UN votes were going, and one in terms of the threat, the risks. He might have done one of those accidentally, but five?”

Salmond said he believed Corbyn’s support would mean the motion had enough cross-party support. “No parliament worth its salt tolerates being mislead,” the former Scotland first minister told ITV’s Peston on Sunday.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/10/tony-blair-contempt-motion-iraq-war-mps



It would be symbolic, nothing more, but it would damage Blair's reputation a bit more - the speeches and fees from financial corporations might flow less freely.

For the record, David Davis was on the Conservative opposition front bench at the time, and voted for the invasion of Iraq (ie he voted 'no' in the crucial 'case for war not established' division): http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2003-03-18&number=117&display=allpossible
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tony Blair could face contempt of parliament motion over Iraq war (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Jul 2016 OP
The majority in Parliament cheered the Iraq war on T_i_B Jul 2016 #1
I have to wonder if doubling down on this man's bad reputation is adequate? midnight Jul 2016 #2
I like the part, "No Parliament worth its salt tolerates being misled." Hoppy Jul 2016 #3
+1 deminks Jul 2016 #4
I continue to be in contempt of Congress. Hoppy Jul 2016 #5
War crimes, Reparations owed uawchild Jul 2016 #6
Couldn't this also read: "contempt of humanity"? nt thucythucy Jul 2016 #7
Lying To Wage Unnecessary War Is Just Fine (Says The 1% They Answer To) Yallow Jul 2016 #8
I can remember a time when PatSeg Jul 2016 #9
He was always inclined to military intervention muriel_volestrangler Jul 2016 #10
Then Bush was just the American PatSeg Jul 2016 #11

T_i_B

(14,737 posts)
1. The majority in Parliament cheered the Iraq war on
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 07:38 AM
Jul 2016

I can't help but think that they should be looking at themselves for their failure to hold the executive to account at the time.

 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
3. I like the part, "No Parliament worth its salt tolerates being misled."
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 08:38 AM
Jul 2016

White House officials have lied to Congress time and time again without consequence. W.M.D., "We don't spy on citizens' phone conversations."

uawchild

(2,208 posts)
6. War crimes, Reparations owed
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 10:27 AM
Jul 2016

Tony Blair, among others, should be tried for war crimes for orchestrating the totally indefensible invasion of Iraq.

Both the UK and the US should be made to pay war reparations to Iraq for the devastation they have caused. The Iraqi people are continuing to suffer as a direct consequence of the U.K.'s and the US's actions.

PatSeg

(47,368 posts)
9. I can remember a time when
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jul 2016

I really liked Tony Blair, until he started hanging out with Bush & Co. I can't believe he bought into Bush's macho cowboy routine. Mothers everywhere have warned us about the company we keep. Maybe Blair wanted to be Churchill to Bush's FDR.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
10. He was always inclined to military intervention
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 01:47 PM
Jul 2016

In 1999, he was in the coalition that bombed Serbia because of the Kosovan situation. After that, he made a speech in Chicago putting forth what became known as the 'Blair Doctrine'.

In 2000, he supported the Sierra Leone government in their civil war (the rebels were associated with Charles Taylor), which is generally recognised as successful and justified.

All that happened before Bush.

PatSeg

(47,368 posts)
11. Then Bush was just the American
Sun Jul 10, 2016, 02:00 PM
Jul 2016

president he was hoping for. Guess I really can't blame Bush for everything. Some people are just assholes naturally, but Blair did it with an English accent.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tony Blair could face con...