Poll: Clinton up 10 points among likely California voters

who think they are "independents" are actually registered to the American Independent Party and not eligible to vote in the Democratic.

He said he signed up that way decades ago because he liked the name and didn't want to sign up as a Republican or a Democrat. I told him AIP is a wack job anti-abortion party. He had no idea. But he didn't seem to care; said he never votes in primaries and did not send in his ballot.

If one poll shows a time out of five that one is correct. The other 4 are due to the FUCKING NEOLIBERAL DLC MAINSTREAM MEDIA BLACKING HIM OUT!!!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512111114

and it won't be over till the superdelegates vote at the convention because she will not have enough pledged delegates! Fucking media pisses me off to no end.

I think there is probably a very good reason why they are not publishing the method of the poll, or the numbers of people polled.
Wonder what that could be.

far, far ahead of president obama.

And by magic I mean bias and trickery.

because to do that he'd have to win 67% of all remaining pledged delegates -- and he's only achieved that percent in one state primary: Vermont's.

All of his "big" wins were in white caucus states that don't resemble CA at all.

As it is, the AP is very likely to announce that he has a majority of all delegates, pledged and superdelegates, after the voting ends in N.J. -- because Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands will have already voted and he only needs 71 votes to reach the total needed. This has been how the AP has called elections since superdelegates were created, in 1984.

I've been enjoying your responses on a lot of posts lately!

I wonder why Hillary cancelled NJ rallies to go to CA since it will be over after NJ according everybody Hillary.

That makes good sense.

But the outcome won't change the primary result.

Her actions show her it is over isn't what her team thinks.

Super delegates are not going to flip.

Brad Ashford isn't the only one that endorsed her last year and decided to stay home. But Hillary and the press are still counting him even though he won't be there to vote for Hillary.

She loses CA, she has a problem for several reasons. Sigh.

I doubt he will, but even if he wins, he will not be the nominee.

Wouldn't be surprised if it's a double digit win.

We will know in five days.

I think it is silly to call a poll bullsh*t just because it projects a victory for one candidate or another.

I guess this country will get what they deserve.

one of the best parts about democracy!

They said the same thing about Oregon, but Sanders won. Maybe this is a voter discouraging strategy.

This afternoon on NPR they said that two new polls out this week had Clinton up by only 2 points, within the margin of error. Unfortunately I didn't hear who did those polls, if they said.

Take note of questions 21,22, and 30 inparticular

https://gqrr.app.box.com/s/xcuxiz76cj9ff0a5v4a1ruwo9gl0u566

Thanks for sharing!

New Jersey closes hours before CA, so she'll go over the delegate count needed to be the nominee then. CA would be nice to win, but mostly irrelevant at that point.

The haste with which Clinton is being coronated is a Karl Rove strategy: declare the victory in advance of the actual clear count, then pound that message home through all media outlets that will take the bait ( or that you own outright. ) Get some of your top political supporters to keep repeating the message too, til people begin to believe it.

There are still states that need to vote, and most independent, non-partisan projections show neither candidate will have enough delegates to win outright. So please stop trying to shorten the process ( I sympathize; it's been painful ) and stop disregarding the rights and votes of Americans who have yet to vote.

No. He was declared nominee by media as soon he hit total delegate count. Same thing will happen now.

But among BS supporters and some others, Hillary should be subject to different rules, of course.

Not to mention Hillary is way more ahead than Obama was when he clinched.

Why the double standard? Sexism. Sorry if that makes you upset. You all likely aren't even aware of it. All other objective reasons would point to there being no controversy about her being nominee.

Thanks for mansplainin' that to me.

I was told in sixth grade I couldn't take shop, cause that's only for boys. I HAD to take Home Ec.

I was told in seventh grade not to sign up for Algebra, cause I wasn't gonna need it; but all the boys got to sign up for it. Take typing, they said, cause you'll need that if you ever get a job.

I was told in high school that even though I found Physics enchanting, I couldn't take it...cause I didn't have the math requirement for it. And it was really a subject for boys anyway.

Sexism? Yay, gender card!!!

You know why the delegate count matters now? Because it's gracious and RIGHT and proper to allow everyone to finish casting their votes before you announce. If I lived in any of the states and territories that had yet to vote or caucus, I'd take that as a GIANT middle finger from the Democratic Party.
EVEN after a member of the DNC said there would be no superdelegates included in the total until at least July 25th.

So you know what I'm doing this afternoon, after 40 years of being a loyal and true member of the Democratic party since 1976? I'm going to change my party affiliation to Independent, here in lovely Madison, Wisconsin.

And from this day forward, F**K the Democratic party.
( Still going to Fighting Bob Fest, at Breese Stevens, though! )

Oh, and to head off the inevitable, "Hillary needs to pivot to the General Election" nonsense; she needs to prepare to fight Trump like she'd need to prepare to fight Kim Kardashian. Trump's gonna implode under his own hubris, in short order.

why should everything be different for Hillary? Media called Obama nominee once he had the delegates. You want media to treat the first woman nominee differently. Why?

So relax and don't do stupid stuff.

Just watching the true colors of "my party" over the last few election cycles, and it's all there for the observant to see: the Democratic party is the "Blue Republican" party now. The only difference between the parties now is that most of the religious crazies are on the Republican side. My view is more nuanced than that. There are GOOD people in the Democratic party, and they're worth fighting for, and worth supporting with sweat and with dollars, but they're fewer and farther between more than ever.

And while the Repubs are hell-bent on destroying everything in their path, too many Dems are just sitting back and watching it happen.

CA dont matter,,, HRC45 will clinch teh nomination in NJ before the poll s close in CA!

As soon as they can.
They called Trump
They will call Clinton
Berners. will remain annoyed.

Expect nothing but the truth!

by announcing that she is the winner at 8pm Eastern time, thus suppressing the vote.

Otherwise it would be "too close to call" or "too early to call". If they say "Hillary won CA", then it means she has the majority of votes.

and THAT suppresses the vote. People feel that their vote will not count in CA, and will not show up to vote.
This is just WRONG! For either candidate it is WRONG!

Someone posted this poll as new. Visibility for the whole truth.

Hillary leads by 10 pts in likely voters.

I'm really trying to figure out what lies his campaign will tell when he loses California...he's pretty much thrown everything out there thus far...none of it worth any merit, but hey, it keeps those donations coming in.

Whew, that was close!

Of all.