Oops! Aetna discloses political donations
Source: CNN Money
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Insurance giant Aetna inadvertently disclosed more than $7 million in donations to conservative political groups in a regulatory filing made earlier this year, according to a Washington-based advocacy group.
Documents obtained and distributed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington show that Aetna made a $3 million donation to the American Action Network and a $4.05 million donation to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in 2011.
Advocates of campaign finance reform say the disclosures, first reported by trade publication SNL Financial, are extremely unusual, and represent the first known major donations from a publicly traded company to political organizations that are not required to reveal the source of their funding.
American Action Network is organized as a 501(c)(4) group, and has deep roots in conservative circles. Former Sen. Norm Coleman, a Republican from Minnesota, is on the board of directors, as is former Rep. Vin Weber, a member of Mitt Romney's economic team.
Read more: http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/14/news/economy/aetna-political-contributions/index.htm?iid=HP_LN
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)You also have to consider United Health, Blue Cross/Wellpoint, Cigna and others as well. How much for all of them in total?
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)Assholes.
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)It's really YOU who are paying to lobby Congress to block attempts to lower the cost of healthcare.
You're BAD!
BAD!
BAD!
BAD!
Go and spank yourselves! But if you hurt yourself don't expect Aetna to pay for your treatment. They're too busy paying for Ben Nelson's swimming pool.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
datadiva
(1,203 posts)Thanks for posting this.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)health care debate ? Thanks for posting.
Lasher
(27,553 posts)Like the single payer CBO study that Pelosi promised Kucinich.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)Lasher
(27,553 posts)If the nation adopted [a] single-payer system that paid providers at Medicares rates, the population that is currently uninsured could be covered without dramatically increasing national spending on health. In fact, all US residents might be covered by health insurance for roughly the current level of spending or even somewhat less, because of savings in administrative costs and lower payment rates for services used by the privately insured. The prospects for con-trolling health care expenditure in future years would also be improved. (Universal Health Insurance Coverage Using Medicares Payment Rates)
http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-system-cost
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)I would have thought members of the house and senate had interns that could have found that in under an hour.
Maybe I just missed it during the health care hearings, but I don't think so.
Lasher
(27,553 posts)Medicare-for-all doesn't create any billionaire overlords, you see. And those right wing stink tanks aren't gonna just fund themselves.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)joeglow3
(6,228 posts)I am curious about this because it is a GREAT graphic I would like to send out to my family. However, I don't want to get burned.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)the politicians more money. The political system is broken and the only people being destroyed are the "little people".
Overseas
(12,121 posts)bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Sedona
(3,769 posts)I JUST GOT OFF THE PHONE WITH THEIR CLAIMS DEPARTMENT,....IN THE PHILIPPINES !