Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:14 PM Apr 2016

Papal official denies report Sanders invited himself to Vatican

Source: Yahoo/Reuters

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was invited to speak at an April 15 Vatican event by the Vatican, a senior papal official said on Friday, denying a report that Sanders had invited himself.

"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.

He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.

A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.

"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-papal-official-untrue-sanders-invited-himself-vatican-173414032.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Papal official denies report Sanders invited himself to Vatican (Original Post) azurnoir Apr 2016 OP
K & R Mbrow Apr 2016 #1
Oooo somebody went off the grid here DebbieCDC Apr 2016 #2
If Archer said what she did RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #3
C'mon, don't sell Archer short! beastie boy Apr 2016 #10
"If Bernie makes good on the already scandalized invitation in the middle of the primaries, he will PatV Apr 2016 #14
Dropping the campaign so he can get some selfies in St Peter's square? beastie boy Apr 2016 #22
Oh brother. Never mind. PatV Apr 2016 #25
A guy from the Bronx addressing a Vatican conference? pscot Apr 2016 #26
Brooklyn. He's from Brooklyn. Smarmie Doofus Apr 2016 #57
So please tell me again, because TM99 Apr 2016 #34
OMG! RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #29
Artful smear Wibly Apr 2016 #4
+1 phazed0 Apr 2016 #5
Yeah, we all know murielm99 Apr 2016 #58
Artful? More like crude, sleazy and stupid. tabasco Apr 2016 #20
A 220 committed delegate lead at this point RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #31
I suppose we have different definitions of "commanding" tabasco Apr 2016 #35
So when Bernie is ahead by 220 committed delegates RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #39
I will do that tabasco Apr 2016 #42
Glad to hear it! n/t RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #44
I think you are mis-reading Rocco. DaveT Apr 2016 #38
I believe you are mis-stating my point of view Dave. RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #43
Um, no. I specifically stated delegate lead in my post and so did Rocco. tabasco Apr 2016 #45
More desperation by those supporting the Desperate Candidate? SoapBox Apr 2016 #6
Who is the real democrat? Geronimoe Apr 2016 #7
DINO Hillary Clinton. She as neither earned nor deserves the nomination, up to this point, imho. SammyWinstonJack Apr 2016 #13
Bernie wasn't invited by the Vatican. The Pope won't even be in town. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #48
+5 appalachiablue Apr 2016 #54
It's worth noting that Msgr. Sánchez Sorondo, who's also from Argentina, has known Francis for years forest444 Apr 2016 #8
Veeeerrrrrrry Innnnteresting. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #9
It only remains to be seen if this woman, Marge Archer, was in cahoots with Hillary's people. forest444 Apr 2016 #12
Proof that she's Opus Dei connected PatV Apr 2016 #21
Always interesting to see how some religious people cannibalize themselves MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #23
A lie travels halfway around the world, it's been said. forest444 Apr 2016 #28
I would hope that she didn't accept payment in Euros... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #37
Proving that not all conspiracies are just theories. dchill Apr 2016 #24
People do indeed conspire. forest444 Apr 2016 #27
Why did you choose to put down this woman with the sexist epithet "hussy"? SunSeeker Apr 2016 #51
I knew that wasnt bernies style.... CarrieLynne Apr 2016 #11
Go Bernie liberal from boston Apr 2016 #16
Any substantiation with that post? KPN Apr 2016 #52
This never gets old. CharlotteVale Apr 2016 #15
Oh boy! That didn't take long to debunk yet another LIE n/t 99th_Monkey Apr 2016 #17
Here's my great wish... MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #18
Kaboom! KPN Apr 2016 #53
The only people saying otherwise are lowlife types for whom the truth is alien. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #19
So those posting the debunked story are falling over themselves apologizing now, right? nt abelenkpe Apr 2016 #30
Then why did they say otherwise earlier? scscholar Apr 2016 #32
That's funny, because someone told me RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #33
Clinton Lied Again billhicks76 Apr 2016 #41
But Hillary supporters are honest! JesterCS Apr 2016 #36
Another Clinton Opus Dei Supporter Caught Lying? billhicks76 Apr 2016 #40
K&R myrna minx Apr 2016 #46
Glad to hear this clarified. The constant dishonesty over very petty things Bradical79 Apr 2016 #47
The Vatican did not invite him. The Academy did. SunSeeker Apr 2016 #49
. Teamster Jeff Apr 2016 #50
knr nt retrowire Apr 2016 #55
it's a tempest in a teapot in any case. yurbud Apr 2016 #56

DebbieCDC

(2,545 posts)
2. Oooo somebody went off the grid here
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:36 PM
Apr 2016

I wonder if Margaret Archer will be demoted, like the Vatican official who set up the Pope to meet Kim Davis.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
3. If Archer said what she did
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:47 PM
Apr 2016

to benefit Clinton, we can ask if she was PAID to say it. You know, in the old fashioned Italian way,

beastie boy

(11,249 posts)
10. C'mon, don't sell Archer short!
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:23 PM
Apr 2016

She obviously got paid for much more than that. She got paid for derailing Bernie's NY primary bid from a far-away land while keeping Hillary's hands clean.

If Bernie makes good on the already scandalized invitation in the middle of the primaries, he will create the optic of dissing New York voters.

If he declines, he will create the optic of dissing the Vatican and will lose the Catholic vote.

Lose-lose, masterfully orchestrated by Hillary's obedient neo-liberal third way minions in the Vatican.

How devious of her! Of course, Bernie's ego had nothing to do with him taking the bait...

-------

Just had to edit the post:

Bernie is not being set up by Hillary's obedient neo-liberal third way minions in Vatican, Bernie is being set up by Hillary's obedient opus dei Thatcherite minions in the Vatican!

My bad and thanks to forest444!

 

PatV

(71 posts)
14. "If Bernie makes good on the already scandalized invitation in the middle of the primaries, he will
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:50 PM
Apr 2016

create the optic of dissing New York voters. "

How in the world would he be doing that? This has nothing to do with Sanders. It's just another bunch of lies coming from Hillary supporters. Do you think all New York voters are stupid? The guy running the conference says he invited him and that's the end of it.

Please how will that "create the optic of dissing New York voters. "

beastie boy

(11,249 posts)
22. Dropping the campaign so he can get some selfies in St Peter's square?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:02 PM
Apr 2016

That says I give a shit about your votes like nothing else. No, the NY voters will not find this at all offending.

At least we can keep our fingers crossed and hope they don't.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
34. So please tell me again, because
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:37 PM
Apr 2016

I do forget the exact number, how many Catholics are there in NY?

Wasn't it something like 45% and in the top five for number of Catholics per state in the US?

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
29. OMG!
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:21 PM
Apr 2016

Talk about desperation!
You folks are all in with the desperation, aren't you.
Now fess up to it, you ARE getting totally desperate, aren't you?

Wibly

(613 posts)
4. Artful smear
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:49 PM
Apr 2016

I knew that story was just more artful smear from the Clinton gang.
The people doing this sort of dirty work for Clinton should be ashamed of themselves. Or maybe they should just join the GOP where that sort of behavior is found acceptable.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
20. Artful? More like crude, sleazy and stupid.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:01 PM
Apr 2016

All Clinton had to do, with a commanding lead in delegates, was to be POSITIVE, shrug off any negative attacks, and maintain an attack focus on the republicans.

But the gutter tactics and sleazy campaigningwill doom her chance to be the nominee.

Not that that's a bad thing.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
31. A 220 committed delegate lead at this point
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:23 PM
Apr 2016

is NOT a commanding lead. It's a lead all right, but NOT a commanding lead.
You do realize that the superdelegates shall go for whoever gets the most committed delegates. Can you give me one example of one time when they have not?

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
39. So when Bernie is ahead by 220 committed delegates
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:53 PM
Apr 2016

I hope that I can see you post that he has a commanding lead!

DaveT

(687 posts)
38. I think you are mis-reading Rocco.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:02 PM
Apr 2016

I think Rocco is referring to the commanding 50+ point polling lead she started with. I agree that if she had stayed positive, her name ID and brand loyalty would have probably carried the day by now. But the more people get to see them contending with each other, Bernie gains and Hillary loses. If she were not so obnoxious, a lot more people would not even bother to take a look at Sanders.

I think all this haughty passive aggressive bullshit is likely to make her position collapse. Her supposed asset is her "experience" and "qualifications." Whining about how mean this little old Jewish guy is to her does not make her look presidential. It makes her look exactly like who she is -- a presumptuous narcissist who has never been a successful politician.

She is like the old joke that Jim Hightower laid on Bush once upon a Democratic Convention. Hillary was born on third base and thinks she hit a triple.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
43. I believe you are mis-stating my point of view Dave.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:01 PM
Apr 2016

If Clinton stood by her views that she has had all along, and did not parrot everything that Bernie states, only a week or so later, she would have lost the nomination by now!
I judge a candidate by what they do, and what they have done over their career, not what they say that they are going to do.
I have heard Bernie for a long time now, something upward of 30 years, and I know what his points of view are. With Clinton that is not the same, because she changes her view, depending on what the polls say, and what audience she is in front of.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
45. Um, no. I specifically stated delegate lead in my post and so did Rocco.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:04 PM
Apr 2016

No big deal, either way.

You restated my point very well. Clinton's campaign manager is a dirtbag and his underhanded tactics are back-firing. Clinton does not have the personal charisma or good judgment to maintain a positive campaign.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
6. More desperation by those supporting the Desperate Candidate?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 04:59 PM
Apr 2016

Sanders "broke the protocol"...he should get in line and change his tone.

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
7. Who is the real democrat?
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:08 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie invited by Vatican to speak on economic justice (for free).

Hillary invited to Goldman Sachs to speak on Bankster profitability for $225,000 per hour talk.

SammyWinstonJack

(44,167 posts)
13. DINO Hillary Clinton. She as neither earned nor deserves the nomination, up to this point, imho.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:32 PM
Apr 2016

Bet I'm not alone in believing that either.

SunSeeker

(53,902 posts)
48. Bernie wasn't invited by the Vatican. The Pope won't even be in town.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:12 PM
Apr 2016
The Sanders campaign made the announcement on Friday as the Vermont senator made the rounds on the morning television news shows. Mr. Sanders, a Democratic presidential candidate, said he would take a break from campaigning in New York, just days before the April 19 primary there, to attend a conference hosted by the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, a scholarly association in Vatican City that was established by Pope John Paul II in 1994.

Mr. Sanders did not initially correct interviewers who suggested that he would meet with the pope, but he later clarified that he had not confirmed whether the two men would actually meet.

Further confusion about the trip bubbled up on Friday afternoon when the Vatican press office made clear that it had not issued the invitation, but that it had come from the academy. It said that there was no indication that Mr. Sanders would meet with Francis.

Meanwhile, Margaret Archer, the academy’s president, told Bloomberg News that Mr. Sanders had actively solicited the invitation for political purposes.

“Sanders made the first move, for the obvious reasons,” Ms. Archer said. “I think in a sense he may be going for the Catholic vote, but this is not the Catholic vote, and he should remember that and act accordingly — not that he will.”

But hours later, Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, a senior papal official and the academy’s chancellor, denied that Mr. Sanders had invited himself to the event. He told Reuters that it was his idea to invite the senator.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/04/08/bernie-sanders-accepts-pope-franciss-invitation-to-travel-to-the-vatican/

In fact, Pope Francis will be in Greece April 14-15.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0X227F

forest444

(5,902 posts)
8. It's worth noting that Msgr. Sánchez Sorondo, who's also from Argentina, has known Francis for years
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:15 PM
Apr 2016

He's the Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences (its highest authority), and he shot down this nonsense allegation in no uncertain terms.

Margaret Archer (the source of the allegation) is a Thatcherite Opus Dei hussy. As such she'd rather eat a 72-oz Texas steak on Good Friday than see Bernie be elected President.

Her word means nothing - least of all to Pope Francis himself.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
12. It only remains to be seen if this woman, Marge Archer, was in cahoots with Hillary's people.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:29 PM
Apr 2016

My suspicion though is that she threw this out there at the behest of the Opus Dei itself (to which she belongs).

As you probably know, they represent the Torquemada wing of the Catholic Church. As such, the last person they want to see in the White House is Bernie Sanders - just as Francis was the last man they wanted to see at the Seat of St. Peter.

 

PatV

(71 posts)
21. Proof that she's Opus Dei connected
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:02 PM
Apr 2016

www.romana.org
Article printed by: http://en.romana.org/art/45/6.0/1


No. 45 • July - December 2007 • Page 316

The first day was dedicated to an analysis of present-day culture and the reality of globalization. Taking part, among others, were Alejandro Llano, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Navarra; Margaret Archer, a sociologist at the University of Warwick; Jean-Luc Chabot, Professor of Political Science at the University of Grenoble; and Marcello Pera, former president of the Italian Senate and professor of Philosophy of Science at the University of Pisa.

Romana - Bulletin of the Prelature of the Holy Cross and Opus Dei
Address: Viale Bruno Buozzi 73, 00197 Rome | [email protected]
English edition: [email protected]

http://en.romana.org/print.php?n=45&s=6.0&ID=1

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
23. Always interesting to see how some religious people cannibalize themselves
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:02 PM
Apr 2016

Where is the news on this? (silly question)

forest444

(5,902 posts)
28. A lie travels halfway around the world, it's been said.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:17 PM
Apr 2016

While the truth is still putting its shoes on.

This Archer woman knew what she was doing, and moreover was definitely following orders. There's no way she'd sacrifice her plum job at the Vatican otherwise.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
27. People do indeed conspire.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:15 PM
Apr 2016

Coincidences do happen, sure; but those who prefer to think that intrigue plays no part in this world of ours only show their ignorance of even basic human history, and are of course only fooling themselves.

'Conspiracy theory', a intelligence official once admitted, is what they themselves call it when someone is getting a little too close to the truth.

SunSeeker

(53,902 posts)
51. Why did you choose to put down this woman with the sexist epithet "hussy"?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:17 PM
Apr 2016

Is "slut shaming" acceptable discourse on DU these days?

16. Go Bernie
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:56 PM
Apr 2016

Interesting to read a comment posted on DU that the Clinton Foundation requested an invitation to the Conference but the request was denied by the Papal Office.

KPN

(16,141 posts)
52. Any substantiation with that post?
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 01:18 PM
Apr 2016

Oh how much I would love that ... and post it every fucking where I can.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
18. Here's my great wish...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:58 PM
Apr 2016

... and I say this because I am neither as evolved as Bernie Sanders or Pope Francis...

I wish that all those who tried to smear the truth that Senator Sander WAS invited by the Vatican to GO FUCK THEMSELVES.

I will now continue trying my best to evolve as a human being while watching these fucking jackals try their best to steal the nomination.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
19. The only people saying otherwise are lowlife types for whom the truth is alien.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:00 PM
Apr 2016

And these people are garbage, real garbage. They've ended up looking more than a little deranged today trying to chase this story down and make something bad of it. And the more they try, the more deranged they look.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
33. That's funny, because someone told me
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 06:24 PM
Apr 2016

that they would have asked Clinton to speak, but her speaking fees were too high.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
41. Clinton Lied Again
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 07:55 PM
Apr 2016

She said that's what Goldman Sachs offered her but then later when sooke at UCLA she tries to negotiate lower fee and SHE REFUSED. Anyone who supports Clinton needs a serious reevaluation.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
47. Glad to hear this clarified. The constant dishonesty over very petty things
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:43 PM
Apr 2016

are one reason Clinton's road to the White House has been far more of a challenge than expected. Bernie Sanders is not a typical corrupt politician. In their attempts at painting him as such, Clinton's most fervent supporters keep pressing too much and inadvertently highlighting her biggest flaws.

SunSeeker

(53,902 posts)
49. The Vatican did not invite him. The Academy did.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:13 PM
Apr 2016
The Sanders campaign made the announcement on Friday as the Vermont senator made the rounds on the morning television news shows. Mr. Sanders, a Democratic presidential candidate, said he would take a break from campaigning in New York, just days before the April 19 primary there, to attend a conference hosted by the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, a scholarly association in Vatican City that was established by Pope John Paul II in 1994.

Mr. Sanders did not initially correct interviewers who suggested that he would meet with the pope, but he later clarified that he had not confirmed whether the two men would actually meet.

Further confusion about the trip bubbled up on Friday afternoon when the Vatican press office made clear that it had not issued the invitation, but that it had come from the academy. It said that there was no indication that Mr. Sanders would meet with Francis.

Meanwhile, Margaret Archer, the academy’s president, told Bloomberg News that Mr. Sanders had actively solicited the invitation for political purposes.

“Sanders made the first move, for the obvious reasons,” Ms. Archer said. “I think in a sense he may be going for the Catholic vote, but this is not the Catholic vote, and he should remember that and act accordingly — not that he will.”

But hours later, Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, a senior papal official and the academy’s chancellor, denied that Mr. Sanders had invited himself to the event. He told Reuters that it was his idea to invite the senator.

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/04/08/bernie-sanders-accepts-pope-franciss-invitation-to-travel-to-the-vatican/

In fact, Pope Francis will be in Greece April 14-15.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0X227F
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Papal official denies rep...