Papal official denies report Sanders invited himself to Vatican
Source: Yahoo/Reuters
U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was invited to speak at an April 15 Vatican event by the Vatican, a senior papal official said on Friday, denying a report that Sanders had invited himself.
"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.
He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.
A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.
"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.
Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-papal-official-untrue-sanders-invited-himself-vatican-173414032.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw
Just another smear job.
DebbieCDC
(2,545 posts)I wonder if Margaret Archer will be demoted, like the Vatican official who set up the Pope to meet Kim Davis.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)to benefit Clinton, we can ask if she was PAID to say it. You know, in the old fashioned Italian way,
beastie boy
(11,249 posts)She obviously got paid for much more than that. She got paid for derailing Bernie's NY primary bid from a far-away land while keeping Hillary's hands clean.
If Bernie makes good on the already scandalized invitation in the middle of the primaries, he will create the optic of dissing New York voters.
If he declines, he will create the optic of dissing the Vatican and will lose the Catholic vote.
Lose-lose, masterfully orchestrated by Hillary's obedient neo-liberal third way minions in the Vatican.
How devious of her! Of course, Bernie's ego had nothing to do with him taking the bait...
-------
Just had to edit the post:
Bernie is not being set up by Hillary's obedient neo-liberal third way minions in Vatican, Bernie is being set up by Hillary's obedient opus dei Thatcherite minions in the Vatican!
My bad and thanks to forest444!
PatV
(71 posts)create the optic of dissing New York voters. "
How in the world would he be doing that? This has nothing to do with Sanders. It's just another bunch of lies coming from Hillary supporters. Do you think all New York voters are stupid? The guy running the conference says he invited him and that's the end of it.
Please how will that "create the optic of dissing New York voters. "
beastie boy
(11,249 posts)That says I give a shit about your votes like nothing else. No, the NY voters will not find this at all offending.
At least we can keep our fingers crossed and hope they don't.
PatV
(71 posts)pscot
(21,037 posts)Yeah. They'll definitely hate that.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)But we like him a lot in the Bronx too.
TM99
(8,352 posts)I do forget the exact number, how many Catholics are there in NY?
Wasn't it something like 45% and in the top five for number of Catholics per state in the US?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Talk about desperation!
You folks are all in with the desperation, aren't you.
Now fess up to it, you ARE getting totally desperate, aren't you?
Wibly
(613 posts)I knew that story was just more artful smear from the Clinton gang.
The people doing this sort of dirty work for Clinton should be ashamed of themselves. Or maybe they should just join the GOP where that sort of behavior is found acceptable.
The unmitigated gall of blaming Bernie for everything under the sun...
murielm99
(31,472 posts)Brock did it.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)All Clinton had to do, with a commanding lead in delegates, was to be POSITIVE, shrug off any negative attacks, and maintain an attack focus on the republicans.
But the gutter tactics and sleazy campaigningwill doom her chance to be the nominee.
Not that that's a bad thing.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)is NOT a commanding lead. It's a lead all right, but NOT a commanding lead.
You do realize that the superdelegates shall go for whoever gets the most committed delegates. Can you give me one example of one time when they have not?
tabasco
(22,974 posts)I think I can live with that.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I hope that I can see you post that he has a commanding lead!
tabasco
(22,974 posts)and be very happy about it because he is my choice.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)DaveT
(687 posts)I think Rocco is referring to the commanding 50+ point polling lead she started with. I agree that if she had stayed positive, her name ID and brand loyalty would have probably carried the day by now. But the more people get to see them contending with each other, Bernie gains and Hillary loses. If she were not so obnoxious, a lot more people would not even bother to take a look at Sanders.
I think all this haughty passive aggressive bullshit is likely to make her position collapse. Her supposed asset is her "experience" and "qualifications." Whining about how mean this little old Jewish guy is to her does not make her look presidential. It makes her look exactly like who she is -- a presumptuous narcissist who has never been a successful politician.
She is like the old joke that Jim Hightower laid on Bush once upon a Democratic Convention. Hillary was born on third base and thinks she hit a triple.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)If Clinton stood by her views that she has had all along, and did not parrot everything that Bernie states, only a week or so later, she would have lost the nomination by now!
I judge a candidate by what they do, and what they have done over their career, not what they say that they are going to do.
I have heard Bernie for a long time now, something upward of 30 years, and I know what his points of view are. With Clinton that is not the same, because she changes her view, depending on what the polls say, and what audience she is in front of.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)No big deal, either way.
You restated my point very well. Clinton's campaign manager is a dirtbag and his underhanded tactics are back-firing. Clinton does not have the personal charisma or good judgment to maintain a positive campaign.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Sanders "broke the protocol"...he should get in line and change his tone.
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)Bernie invited by Vatican to speak on economic justice (for free).
Hillary invited to Goldman Sachs to speak on Bankster profitability for $225,000 per hour talk.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,167 posts)Bet I'm not alone in believing that either.
SunSeeker
(53,902 posts)Mr. Sanders did not initially correct interviewers who suggested that he would meet with the pope, but he later clarified that he had not confirmed whether the two men would actually meet.
Further confusion about the trip bubbled up on Friday afternoon when the Vatican press office made clear that it had not issued the invitation, but that it had come from the academy. It said that there was no indication that Mr. Sanders would meet with Francis.
Meanwhile, Margaret Archer, the academys president, told Bloomberg News that Mr. Sanders had actively solicited the invitation for political purposes.
Sanders made the first move, for the obvious reasons, Ms. Archer said. I think in a sense he may be going for the Catholic vote, but this is not the Catholic vote, and he should remember that and act accordingly not that he will.
But hours later, Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, a senior papal official and the academys chancellor, denied that Mr. Sanders had invited himself to the event. He told Reuters that it was his idea to invite the senator.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/04/08/bernie-sanders-accepts-pope-franciss-invitation-to-travel-to-the-vatican/
In fact, Pope Francis will be in Greece April 14-15.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0X227F
appalachiablue
(42,980 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)He's the Chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences (its highest authority), and he shot down this nonsense allegation in no uncertain terms.
Margaret Archer (the source of the allegation) is a Thatcherite Opus Dei hussy. As such she'd rather eat a 72-oz Texas steak on Good Friday than see Bernie be elected President.
Her word means nothing - least of all to Pope Francis himself.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)My suspicion though is that she threw this out there at the behest of the Opus Dei itself (to which she belongs).
As you probably know, they represent the Torquemada wing of the Catholic Church. As such, the last person they want to see in the White House is Bernie Sanders - just as Francis was the last man they wanted to see at the Seat of St. Peter.
PatV
(71 posts)www.romana.org
Article printed by: http://en.romana.org/art/45/6.0/1
No. 45 July - December 2007 Page 316
The first day was dedicated to an analysis of present-day culture and the reality of globalization. Taking part, among others, were Alejandro Llano, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Navarra; Margaret Archer, a sociologist at the University of Warwick; Jean-Luc Chabot, Professor of Political Science at the University of Grenoble; and Marcello Pera, former president of the Italian Senate and professor of Philosophy of Science at the University of Pisa.
Romana - Bulletin of the Prelature of the Holy Cross and Opus Dei
Address: Viale Bruno Buozzi 73, 00197 Rome | [email protected]
English edition: [email protected]
http://en.romana.org/print.php?n=45&s=6.0&ID=1
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Where is the news on this? (silly question)
forest444
(5,902 posts)While the truth is still putting its shoes on.
This Archer woman knew what she was doing, and moreover was definitely following orders. There's no way she'd sacrifice her plum job at the Vatican otherwise.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)dchill
(40,628 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)Coincidences do happen, sure; but those who prefer to think that intrigue plays no part in this world of ours only show their ignorance of even basic human history, and are of course only fooling themselves.
'Conspiracy theory', a intelligence official once admitted, is what they themselves call it when someone is getting a little too close to the truth.
SunSeeker
(53,902 posts)Is "slut shaming" acceptable discourse on DU these days?
CarrieLynne
(497 posts)liberal from boston
(856 posts)Interesting to read a comment posted on DU that the Clinton Foundation requested an invitation to the Conference but the request was denied by the Papal Office.
KPN
(16,141 posts)Oh how much I would love that ... and post it every fucking where I can.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... and I say this because I am neither as evolved as Bernie Sanders or Pope Francis...
I wish that all those who tried to smear the truth that Senator Sander WAS invited by the Vatican to GO FUCK THEMSELVES.
I will now continue trying my best to evolve as a human being while watching these fucking jackals try their best to steal the nomination.
If you are a Bernie supporter, you are obviously getting there ... evolving that is.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)And these people are garbage, real garbage. They've ended up looking more than a little deranged today trying to chase this story down and make something bad of it. And the more they try, the more deranged they look.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)This is disgusting politics.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)that they would have asked Clinton to speak, but her speaking fees were too high.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She said that's what Goldman Sachs offered her but then later when sooke at UCLA she tries to negotiate lower fee and SHE REFUSED. Anyone who supports Clinton needs a serious reevaluation.
JesterCS
(1,828 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)are one reason Clinton's road to the White House has been far more of a challenge than expected. Bernie Sanders is not a typical corrupt politician. In their attempts at painting him as such, Clinton's most fervent supporters keep pressing too much and inadvertently highlighting her biggest flaws.
SunSeeker
(53,902 posts)Mr. Sanders did not initially correct interviewers who suggested that he would meet with the pope, but he later clarified that he had not confirmed whether the two men would actually meet.
Further confusion about the trip bubbled up on Friday afternoon when the Vatican press office made clear that it had not issued the invitation, but that it had come from the academy. It said that there was no indication that Mr. Sanders would meet with Francis.
Meanwhile, Margaret Archer, the academys president, told Bloomberg News that Mr. Sanders had actively solicited the invitation for political purposes.
Sanders made the first move, for the obvious reasons, Ms. Archer said. I think in a sense he may be going for the Catholic vote, but this is not the Catholic vote, and he should remember that and act accordingly not that he will.
But hours later, Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, a senior papal official and the academys chancellor, denied that Mr. Sanders had invited himself to the event. He told Reuters that it was his idea to invite the senator.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/04/08/bernie-sanders-accepts-pope-franciss-invitation-to-travel-to-the-vatican/
In fact, Pope Francis will be in Greece April 14-15.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0X227F