HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » D.C. Madam's Attorney Say...

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:52 PM

D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Call Log Bombshell Could Upend 2016 Race

Source: U, S. News & World Report

D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Call Log Bombshell Could Upend 2016 Race

Judges 'are letting people vote blindly,' gagged lawyer says.

By Steven Nelson
March 28, 2016, at 2:55 p.m.

A lawyer who represented the so-called “D.C. madam” says he has phone records that could influence the outcome of the presidential election, and he’s threatening to release one or more names on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court if he’s denied a hearing on his right to distribute them.

Montgomery Blair Sibley, the late madam Deborah Palfrey’s colorful attorney, has been subject to a restraining order since 2007 barring him from releasing the information, which he says includes 815 names, addresses and Social Security numbers of Verizon Wireless customers.

“Time is of the essence because people are casting votes in primaries and caucuses,” he says. “I believe this information is relevant to that political discourse.”

Sibley first said the records could be relevant to the presidential race in January, when there were 15 high-profile candidates. Now, just three Republicans and two Democrats remain – though Sibley won’t say if any are implicated, citing fear of being jailed for contempt.

Read more: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-28/dc-madams-attorney-says-call-log-bombshell-could-upend-presidential-race

124 replies, 13694 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 124 replies Author Time Post
Reply D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Call Log Bombshell Could Upend 2016 Race (Original post)
Judi Lynn Mar 2016 OP
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #1
billhicks76 Mar 2016 #49
Mike Daniels Mar 2016 #88
billhicks76 Mar 2016 #90
wildbilln864 Mar 2016 #108
Bob41213 Mar 2016 #113
Botany Mar 2016 #2
roguevalley Mar 2016 #16
Baobab Mar 2016 #21
dynamo99 Mar 2016 #27
DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #28
840high Mar 2016 #41
floriduck Mar 2016 #44
Amaril Mar 2016 #78
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #114
awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #87
adigal Mar 2016 #107
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #115
DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #117
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #118
liberal N proud Mar 2016 #29
NJCher Mar 2016 #35
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #31
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #119
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #121
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #122
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #123
Angel Martin Mar 2016 #42
6000eliot Mar 2016 #48
Darb Mar 2016 #67
hedgehog Mar 2016 #104
Mr.Bill Mar 2016 #109
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #72
6000eliot Mar 2016 #76
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #85
6000eliot Mar 2016 #96
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #99
hereforthevoting Mar 2016 #102
EllieBC Mar 2016 #120
mahina Mar 2016 #94
Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #116
EllieBC Mar 2016 #47
Democat Mar 2016 #57
Darb Mar 2016 #65
beastie boy Mar 2016 #73
hobbit709 Mar 2016 #97
beastie boy Mar 2016 #110
hobbit709 Mar 2016 #111
beastie boy Mar 2016 #112
Democat Mar 2016 #56
Sunlei Mar 2016 #92
Glimmer of Hope Mar 2016 #3
bluestateguy Mar 2016 #4
Dustlawyer Mar 2016 #7
Wilms Mar 2016 #10
4139 Mar 2016 #11
Contrary1 Mar 2016 #13
billhicks76 Mar 2016 #50
JDPriestly Mar 2016 #59
Scuba Mar 2016 #5
CTyankee Mar 2016 #93
Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #6
Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2016 #14
Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #15
johnfunk Mar 2016 #20
SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #24
liberal N proud Mar 2016 #30
trusty elf Mar 2016 #63
JustAnotherGen Mar 2016 #62
Amaril Mar 2016 #80
restorefreedom Mar 2016 #100
man of few w Mar 2016 #8
Jitter65 Mar 2016 #12
tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #39
4139 Mar 2016 #9
csziggy Mar 2016 #23
DrToast Mar 2016 #17
Post removed Mar 2016 #22
Babel_17 Mar 2016 #34
NJCher Mar 2016 #36
Darb Mar 2016 #68
Babel_17 Mar 2016 #71
vkkv Mar 2016 #18
NJCher Mar 2016 #38
johnfunk Mar 2016 #19
ConservativeDemocrat Mar 2016 #25
Justitia Mar 2016 #26
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #32
Grins Mar 2016 #64
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #70
beastie boy Mar 2016 #74
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #75
beastie boy Mar 2016 #79
Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #86
beastie boy Mar 2016 #95
pnwmom Mar 2016 #33
Firebrand Gary Mar 2016 #37
RandySF Mar 2016 #52
JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #54
enigmatic Mar 2016 #55
Botany Mar 2016 #69
Agnosticsherbet Mar 2016 #40
DebbieCDC Mar 2016 #43
NJCher Mar 2016 #45
Jarqui Mar 2016 #46
Judi Lynn Mar 2016 #51
JDPriestly Mar 2016 #60
Gomez163 Mar 2016 #53
Democat Mar 2016 #58
JDPriestly Mar 2016 #61
Vinca Mar 2016 #66
Octafish Mar 2016 #84
WIProgressive88 Mar 2016 #98
smirkymonkey Mar 2016 #124
RobinA Mar 2016 #77
DebbieCDC Mar 2016 #82
mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2016 #81
Octafish Mar 2016 #83
AxionExcel Mar 2016 #101
ViseGrip Mar 2016 #89
dlwickham Mar 2016 #91
The Second Stone Mar 2016 #103
Turborama Mar 2016 #105
DebbieCDC Mar 2016 #106

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:54 PM

1. Oh I gotta know more LOL

WE know it wont be Bernie or Hillary...so it has to be one of those slime-balls, I dont care if they are still running or not

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:49 AM

49. She Said She Would Never Commit Suicide

 

And then she was found hung in FL. She was obviously murdered but our press is full of cowards who were to afraid to dog for the truth. Just like many of our fellow citizens prefer ignorance. Cheney no doubt or the CIA preserving continuity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to billhicks76 (Reply #49)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:54 PM

88. She actually told a reporter from Time that she would commit suicide before going to prison again

She went to prison previously for prostitution related charges and said she wouldn't relive the process.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mike Daniels (Reply #88)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:26 PM

90. That Reporter Was Discredited

 

I assume you meant that author. The CIA biographer. And she said on national radio she wouldn't kill herself. That authors claim is unsubstantiated and he is an outted CIA informant.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to billhicks76 (Reply #90)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:21 PM

108. thank you. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:47 PM

113. I've got to know more too. Lol

I would never say never in Washington though. I've been surprised plenty by politicians (and people in general). I saw a list that speculated the least likely to most likely. To my recollection it went:

5) Hillary cause she's a woman (I also think it ignored Bill as a possibility)
4) Trump cause he doesn't need to pay for it
3) Bernie
2) Kasich
1) Cruz

FWIW

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:56 PM

2. Wasn't one of the women in the National Enquirer Ted Cruz piece a hooker?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #2)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:07 PM

16. I wonder if this has bill's name in it? If it did it would explode HRC's campaign. I think limiting

it to men might be too small a reach. This guy has major cojones to do this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:25 PM

21. I doubt it

also, as much as i dislike Cruz, i'm even more sick of all the crap thats getting put forward as news to push issues out of the public eye.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:41 PM

27. Nah

If you're the Prez of the USA, you don't need commercial services to get a hookup. As history demonstrates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:56 PM

28. What an awful thing to say...

I wonder if this has bill's name in it? If it did it would explode HRC's campaign.


What an awful thing to say... But I can't say I'm surprised.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #28)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:03 PM

41. With his histiry - not awful.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #28)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:10 PM

44. My first thought was the Donald.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Reply #44)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:07 PM

78. Ditto! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Reply #44)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:59 PM

114. Would get him more votes, though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #28)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:49 PM

87. Why it so awful?

 

We know his past. Hell, if it came out the Sanders was on the list it would shock and disappoint me, but it wouldn't be the first time- my first choice in 08 was Edwards. I know we hate to admit it, but none of these people are perfect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #28)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:40 PM

107. Let's be real, does anyone think he ever stopped cheating on Hillary? I'm sure she said "Be discreet

 

And what's more discreet than a high class madam? I don't think this will hurt Hillary if it comes out though, as much as it would hurt the actual men who may have used this service and are running for office.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #28)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:00 PM

115. And yet we are both afraid of the possibility. The good news is if Hillary had already

been picked, we would have time to switch to Bernie if necessary.

Personally, I would not see any reason for anyone who calls themselves liberal to give a shit who sleeps with who.


EDITED: I wish I had not responded at all...this is nothing more than smearing Ms. Clinton and I dont go for that

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Reply #115)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:02 PM

117. Respectfully, please speak for yourself.

I doubt Bill is putting the wood to escorts so it would be illogical for me to fear it being revealed. And in any case it has nothing to do with his spouse.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #117)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:04 PM

118. Agreed, I shouldnt have responded at all... this is just more bullshit to attack Hillary

too late to delete but I will revise

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:58 PM

29. That horse ran it's race a long time ago.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberal N proud (Reply #29)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:23 PM

35. yep, 'fraid so

Funny, though!


Cher

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:01 PM

31. EXACTLY what I was thinking in my devious mind.

 

Would ANYONE be shocked to learn that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #31)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:06 PM

119. Thinking or hoping?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Reply #119)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 05:05 PM

121. Both. I am rooting for Bernie over Hillary, after all

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #121)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 05:08 PM

122. So you hope President Clinton is exposed to have been involved with this

AND you are hoping the leading Democratic candidate is ruined?

Really?

Even if she wins the nomination?

What then?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jackie Wilson Said (Reply #122)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 05:12 PM

123. She WILL NOT Be the nominee. Any more questions?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:08 PM

42. Hillary doesn't have much margin for error here,

and I am sure she has Bill on a very short leash.

If Bill starts to act up during this campaign, Hillary is liable to phone Joni Ernst and ask for suggestions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Angel Martin (Reply #42)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:45 AM

48. Of course the Bernie-bots have to make this about Hillary.

This line of attack is not sexist in the least.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #48)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:58 AM

67. I've seen it before.

 

In the '90s, on the back of my grandmothers bathroom door, a poster of the Clinton Body Count. The bernies reach a new low every day. One of them should speak up about it, but so far......crickets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Darb (Reply #67)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 12:30 PM

104. Wait - all Sanders' supporters must publicly deny any possibility

that Bill Clinton ever used this call-girl service? IMHO, it may or may not have happened, but it is certainly in the realm of the possible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hedgehog (Reply #104)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:06 PM

109. What Bill Clinton doesn't have a record of

is paying for it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #48)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:09 AM

72. Sexist? How's that? Bill does have a record of philandering.

 

Bernie-bots my ass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #72)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:03 PM

76. And that has exactly WHAT to do with Hillary?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #76)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:25 PM

85. Aren't they kind of related in some way? Marriage, maybe?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #85)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:24 PM

96. Holding a wife responsible for her husband's actions is sexist.

Do I really need to spell this out? Would HE be held responsible for HER infidelities?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #96)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:19 AM

99. OF COURSE NOT!, but he will be roaming the halls of the White House, and I don't want to go back.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #96)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:35 AM

102. In a tight presidential election

You bet your swim trunks it would come up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hereforthevoting (Reply #102)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:07 PM

120. So sexism is ok because it's a primary?

Sexism is never ok, regardless of what the Bros want to believe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #76)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:35 PM

94. Agreed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 6000eliot (Reply #48)


Response to roguevalley (Reply #16)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:29 PM

47. I bet conservatives wonder the same.

It's kind of cute how some on the left have started using the late 90s language of conservatives. And by cute I mean disturbing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to EllieBC (Reply #47)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:45 AM

57. They sound exactly like right wingers because they probably are

The primaries have stopped DU from banning right wing trolls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democat (Reply #57)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:55 AM

65. We get banned instead. Push back and your message gets pulled.

 

Bunch of crybabies. If I were a bagger troll I would hide out in the Bernie crowd for sure. There are so many willing to protect you as long as it helps them get their "democratic" socialist elected. No low is too low.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Darb (Reply #65)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:50 AM

73. A month ago I was banned for saying half as much

Good to know that banning a single poster doesn't shut the community up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beastie boy (Reply #73)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:27 PM

97. So you admit to being banned and now you're back?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #97)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:04 PM

110. You make it sound like a sin in need of confession.

No, I don't "admit". I state.

And if I am being silenced for no reason, you bet I'll be back!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beastie boy (Reply #110)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:09 PM

111. I wonder who the previous incarnation was. Your style reminds me of a couple.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #111)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:18 PM

112. You are welcome to sift through the 232,392 user registrations.

Meanwhile, allow me to proceed with something comparatively productive: watch the grass grow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to roguevalley (Reply #16)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:44 AM

56. You sound like a right wing troll

Go back to the Primaries forum or Free Republic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Botany (Reply #2)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:49 PM

92. yes, the hooker who said Cruz liked her dressed as a schoolgirl.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 07:59 PM

3. Very interesting...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:02 PM

4. Cruz was not in DC until 2013

And the madam died in 2007.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestateguy (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:10 PM

7. When did Cruz clerk for the Supreme Court?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to bluestateguy (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:18 PM

11. He was in the DC area until 2003, worked for DOJ

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestateguy (Reply #4)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:19 PM

13. Cruz worked at the Washington law firm of Cooper, Carvin & Rosenthal in '97 and '98

Also joined Dubya's presidential campaign in 1999 as a domestic policy adviser...so he could have been in DC.

He wasn't yet married, so I don't see much damage, even if it turns out to be him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestateguy (Reply #4)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:50 AM

50. Killed Not Just Died

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestateguy (Reply #4)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:28 AM

59. Wrong.

Cruz graduated from Princeton University in 1992, and from Harvard Law School in 1995. Between 1999 and 2003, he was the Director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, an Associate Deputy Attorney General at the United States Department of Justice, and domestic policy advisor to George W. Bush on the 2000 George W. Bush presidential campaign. He served as Solicitor General of Texas, from 2003 to 2008, appointed by Texas Attorney General, Greg Abbott. He was the first Hispanic, and the longest-serving, Solicitor General in Texas history. From 2004 to 2009, Cruz was also an adjunct professor at the University of Texas School of Law in Austin, where he taught U.S. Supreme Court litigation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz

Then there is Kasich.

Kasich served nine terms as a member of the United States House of Representatives, representing Ohio's 12th congressional district from 1983 to 2001.[5] His tenure in the House included 18 years on the House Armed Services Committee and six years as chairman of the House Budget Committee. He was a key figure in the passage of both welfare reform and the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

He was a commentator on Fox News Channel, hosting Heartland with John Kasich from 2001 to 2007. He also worked as an investment banker, a managing director of Lehman Brothers' Columbus, Ohio, office.[6][7]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kasich

Bernie was also in D.C. in the appropriate period, but I don't see him as linked into the sort of network that would have tipped him off about the D.C. madam. Also it is hard for me to imagine Bernie spending the money or the time on something like that. He doesn't even bother to comb his hair some of the time. I don't think he has the ego for visiting a prostitute but I could be wrong.

The entire story could be bogus. May be that not a one of them is on that list but that this is an opportunity to create a stir anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:03 PM

5. Being in the madam's book would help Trump, hurt Cruz badly.

 

I won't speculate on others.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:56 PM

93. well, Cruz is so creepy perhaps all he could get was a hooker he had to pay and I'll bet

they're not cheap...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:03 PM

6. Teddy on a teddy...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dont call me Shirley (Reply #6)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:42 PM

14. Teddy IN a teddy ... horrors!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #14)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:47 PM

15. Chills, and not good ones either...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #14)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:13 PM

20. … and caught in bed with a dead girl AND a live boy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to johnfunk (Reply #20)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:38 PM

24. Well, that's proof

That picture couldn't have been faked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to johnfunk (Reply #20)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:00 PM

30. Oh, my EYES!

Don't do that to us.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to liberal N proud (Reply #30)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:36 AM

63. How about this?



[img][/img]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to johnfunk (Reply #20)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:32 AM

62. I just

Hate you for this! My eyes! My eyes! Some things can't be unseen.

Psst - thanks for the laugh.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to johnfunk (Reply #20)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:15 PM

80. Ah, geez.........

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to johnfunk (Reply #20)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:28 AM

100. oh man, i will never unsee that lol nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:10 PM

8. HE has phone records?

 

How did Gloria Allred miss this gig?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to man of few w (Reply #8)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:18 PM

12. Maybe he should just turn over the info to Anonymous and let them take it from there? lol

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jitter65 (Reply #12)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:43 PM

39. or accidently leave them on his porch with a 'do not steal these: PRIVATE' on the envelope


not anyone's fault if something gets stolen - was not intentionally handed out

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 08:16 PM

9. While the gossip in me really wants to know, the records really aren't the attorney's...

They are the dead madam's records.

Ted? John? Donald? Bernie? Bill? or Hillary?

Or several of the above???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 4139 (Reply #9)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:32 PM

23. At the end of the article is how he "got {his} hands on them"

From the article linked in the OP"
The records had carelessly been left in Palfrey’s basement, Sibley recalls.

“When the Keystone Kop police came in to seize everything [from Palfrey’s house] they walked by these boxes saying Pamela Martin Associates telephone records, 1996-2006, and they just left them there,” Sibley says. “So I got my hands on them and released a portion of them.”

But about a third of the records were not released, he says. “We held back these 5,000,” Sibley says. “I wanted to have something to negotiate with or surprise people at trial.”

Before trial, U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler authorized subpoenas for cellphone companies requesting personal information. Verizon Wireless returned a list containing the names, addresses and Social Security numbers of about 815 people, Sibley says – a sizable subset of the 5,000 numbers not initially released.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:09 PM

17. Damn it, Hillary!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DrToast (Reply #17)


Response to Post removed (Reply #22)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:18 PM

34. I suspect a hide might be coming your way

As a DU member it's incumbent on me to point that out, before someone alerts on your post. Rough humor is one thing, but there's also a line. I hope this comes across as friendly!

You can edit your post (or not).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Babel_17 (Reply #34)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:36 PM

36. I see your point, but

It made me laugh.

And the selected emoticon was so apropos.




Cher

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Babel_17 (Reply #34)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:02 AM

68. You were right,

 

I missed it. Must have said something about Bernie. You can only say anything vile you want about Hillary, not the beloved "democratic" socialist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Darb (Reply #68)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 09:47 AM

71. Click on the "Show" button next to to "This message was hidden by Jury decision." to see it

It was about Secretary Clinton.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:10 PM

18. Bernie, how COULD you ! !

 




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to vkkv (Reply #18)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:39 PM

38. gasp!

Perfect!


Cher

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:11 PM

19. Grab…

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:39 PM

25. No it won't

Mark Sanford, David Vitter, and Donald Trump all prove that Republican only pretend to care about these sorts of things. It won't hurt them in the general election one whit.

They're Christian in name only.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 09:39 PM

26. I always felt her story (Palfrey) was a very sad story. - eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Justitia (Reply #26)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:06 PM

32. The PTB murdered her, of that I am sure.

 

There must be something pretty big in those records.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #32)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:48 AM

64. Proof, please

Then why wasn't the attorney murdered?

The is no proof at all that Palfrey was murdered.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Grins (Reply #64)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:43 AM

70. Google is your friend.

 

When the government does it, there usually is no "proof".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #70)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 10:58 AM

74. In this case, it was the government that murdered Nicole Brown Simpson...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beastie boy (Reply #74)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:52 AM

75. huh?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #75)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:12 PM

79. When absence of proof is presented as proof, you can claim anything.

Did you ever watch any of those History Channel programs about aliens?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beastie boy (Reply #79)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:35 PM

86. Let me remind you what my original comment was (emphasis is mine)

 

The PTB murdered her, of that I am sure.


I don't need to prove to you that "I" believe she was offed by the gubmint. You're probably one of those that thinks 9/11 was pulled off without Bush/Cheney knowledge. Don't be naïve.

I'm betting you won't look at this link:
http://www.ae911truth.org/gallery/evidence.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #86)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 04:48 PM

95. OK-KAY, now it's 9/11

I am soooo convinced!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:14 PM

33. Releasing SS numbers should never be allowed. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 10:37 PM

37. It's Kasich! BET ON IT!

John Kasich was a member of Congress from January 3, 1983 – January 3, 2001, He was there for the DC Madam era... It's Kasich, the GOP's "convention failsafe" is screwed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Firebrand Gary (Reply #37)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:53 AM

52. It has to be.

Cruz was not in Washington at the time,

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #52)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:13 AM

54. He was, but he wasn't married until 2001.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Firebrand Gary (Reply #37)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:15 AM

55. If it's Kasich, it's not a a female prostitute

He's deep in the closet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to enigmatic (Reply #55)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 08:10 AM

69. +1

n t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:03 PM

40. Damn skippy he should release them all.

I don't give a damn who was doing what to who, but I dislike hypocrisy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:08 PM

43. I'd bet money Bill's in that little black book (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:18 PM

45. why doesn't he just stage a "break-in?"

Somebody breaks in, steals the records....

If he really wants the word out, that's what he'd do. I am suspecting there are other motives here.

OTOH, I am scandal-deprived and would like to believe otherwise. And you know whose fault it is, don't you! That No-Drama Obama. I've forgotten the fun of a good D.C. scandal.

One last comment. This is from Ted Cruz:

“These smears are completely false, they’re offensive to Heidi and me, they’re offensive to our daughters, and they’re offensive to everyone Donald continues to personally attack,”

Now really, look at that statement. A "smear" is "completely false?" Is that not a bit of a redundancy? Or: A completely false smear. Is that not a double negative? So that would mean it's true?

And who cares if they're offensive to Ted, his wife, and his daughters. Duh, Ted. That was the whole idea.



Cher

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Mon Mar 28, 2016, 11:24 PM

46. Montgomery Blair Sibley is wacky

Last edited Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:00 AM - Edit history (1)

He wrote a book on his client DC Madam, who committed suicide in 2008
http://www.whyjusther.com/
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,355,140 in Books (that ranking equates to selling about 1 per year - big failure)
Why Just Her Paperback – April 14, 2009 by Montgomery Blair Sibley

2007 The Colorful Case of A Well-Named Lawyer
DC and Florida suspended his law license for going after judges after his wife took him to court for child support (very roughly from memory)

This outlines what happened with him losing his ability to practice law
http://overlawyered.com/2008/05/montgomery-blair-sibley-suspended/

http://www.dcbar.org/discipline/bpr_report/MontgomeryBlairSibley40806.pdf


While that was going on, he hooked up with this career felon and lost a lawsuit against Obama with him:

2008 Larry Sinclair's lawyer (Sibley) talks about his genitalia
(at a press conference where Sinclair is arrested for passing counterfeit money orders in Delaware while eluding a warrant in Colorado for cashing some else's check and the FBI chasing Sinclair out of Laredo for smuggling illegal aliens)

The press conference was stranger than fiction with two certifiable nuts on display.
Sinclair and Sibley had a falling out and Sinclair alleged Sibley kept his money.

Sibley ran for President in 2012 ... and did his birther thing against Obama
http://montgomeryblairsibley.com/

Last year, he tried to sue Congress:
THURSDAY, APRIL 9, 2015 Montgomery Blair Sibley vs. Congress

He writes these wild briefs (this one pro se example) for his frivolous lawsuits
http://montgomeryblairsibley.com/library/SibleyvDoeInitialBrief.pdf
http://montgomeryblairsibley.com/library/SibleyvDoeRecordExtract.pdf
http://www.foavc.org/reference/Counsel2.pdf
http://www.foavc.org/reference/McConnell_Ryan_Letter_11192015.pdf

He was still working the Obama birther angle a year ago ... trying to nail Obama criminally
Montgomery Blair Sibley Suggests Citizens Nationwide Petition Their Local County Grand Jury to Investigate Obama’s Forged ID Docs

look at all this legal crap he's done fairly recently:
http://www.thepostemail.com/tag/montgomery-blair-sibley/

This example of outcome is typical
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2015/10/no-standing-in-case-for-constitutional-convention.html

The guy is nuts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Reply #46)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:52 AM

51. At least he keeps busy. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jarqui (Reply #46)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:41 AM

60. And this claim may be a complete fiction just to scare the candidates.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)


Response to Gomez163 (Reply #53)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 02:47 AM

58. It's probably a Republican

No need to bash our side when Republicans are more likely.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gomez163 (Reply #53)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:43 AM

61. No. Cruz and Kasich were also in D.C. at the relevant time.

The D.C. Madam may have been kind of a hot tip in certain circles (if this story has any reality to it at all, and it well may not).

I seriously doubt that Bernie would have been on the hot tip circuit when it comes to this. See the Wikipedia articles on Cruz and Kasich and their careers in D.C. at the relevant time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gomez163 (Reply #53)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 07:57 AM

66. OMG - I was going to post that exact same thing. As a joke!

I suppose this will now be the smear du jour for Hillary promoters although the likelihood of there being any truth to it having odds worse than getting bitten by a shark after being hit by lightening after falling off your solid gold yacht in the middle of an ocean of chocolate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gomez163 (Reply #53)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 01:01 PM

84. CIA used DC Madam

You don't think they would run a honey trap or two on US pols?

http://milfuegos.blogspot.com/2009/07/dc-madam-had-cia-ties.html

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gomez163 (Reply #53)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 11:50 PM

98. A number of Hillary supporters lost their shit up-thread when it was (inappropriately, I would add)

suggested that President Clinton may be connected to this "bombshell", and yet those voices are strangely silent at your completely baseless accusation against Bernie. Interesting...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Gomez163 (Reply #53)

Thu Mar 31, 2016, 06:44 PM

124. I'm sorry, but that just doesn't seem like Bernie's style.

Besides, I don't really think he has the money for a high-rent call girl.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:06 PM

77. You Have To Give

your social security number to hire a hooker? Someone would give their social security number to a hooker?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RobinA (Reply #77)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:50 PM

82. The records released by Verizon had their customers' social security numbers included (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 12:17 PM

81. "Montgomery Blair Sibley, the late madam Deborah Palfrey’s colorful attorney,..."

That's putting it mildly.

Montgomery Blair Sibley

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Octafish (Reply #83)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:32 AM

101. Like Trump, he's a freaking embodiment of a standard Repube Value: hypocrisy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:24 PM

89. Tick tock....

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Tue Mar 29, 2016, 03:34 PM

91. If it's Bernie I'll send him a $100 donation

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 12:01 PM

103. Wonder if it's Hillary. Lip flapper should stop teasing us and either release it or shut up

 

Seriously dude. Either spend the time in jail for contempt or shut up about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 12:48 PM

105. Perhaps Trump let her run franchises in his hotels?

Just thinking out of the box.

This may not be it, but I'm sure there's a gigantic skeleton in his closet that's going to pop out sooner or later.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:24 PM

106. According to MSNBC (Tuesday night)

The attorney has jumped over the appellate court and filed a motion with SCOTUS to be released from the order.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread