Obama arrives in Cuba; hopes visit will usher in change
Source: CNN
Havana (CNN)President Barack Obama touched down in Cuba on Sunday, definitively ending a half-century of estrangement in a dramatic personal demonstration of his core foreign policy principle of engaging America's enemies.
It's a shift that the change-minded president hopes will nudge the Communist government here to grant more freedoms to its people and open new economic channels for American businesses. The President and his allies also hope a successful détente will offer something bigger: a lasting example of diplomacy's power in dealing with longtime foes.
Just before Obama stepped from Air Force One -- carrying an umbrella as a persistent rain fell on the tarmac -- he sent a message to Cubans on a platform that until recently would have been unheard of in the repressive regime.
"¿Que bolá Cuba?" he wrote on Twitter, using an informal Cuban greeting. "Just touched down here, looking forward to meeting and hearing directly from the Cuban people."
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/20/politics/obama-cuba-arrival-change/index.html
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)I had those hopes of change eight years ago.
brooklynite
(94,498 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)He has control of distribution of forces.
He could have the detention units assigned elsewhere.
The base would remain open.
Standard military operation.
brooklynite
(94,498 posts)...he can make decisions about the military. He CAN'T make decisions about movement of prisoners to civil authority in the United States if Congress says otherwise.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,826 posts)and move the prisoners, but many on DU think that Article 1 Section 9 Clause 7 doesn't exist -
<Explanation: The departments and agencies of the executive branch may not spend any money that Congress has not appropriated, or use federal money for any purpose that Congress has not specified.>
http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2014/02/article-i-the-legislative-branch-powers-denied-to-congress-and-the-states-sections-9-and-10/
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)I put my time in grade. I know how the Military works. If there was a desire to close Gitmo detention, it would be done. With or without Congress.
BumRushDaShow
(128,826 posts)and know how this damn tricameral government works and have taken far too many Appropriations Law courses to count. In order to completely close that facility, it needs appropriations to move the personnel and equipment, and Congress must authorize and appropriate the funds to do that, otherwise you are in violation of the law. You should know better.