HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Appeals court rejects Dis...

Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:33 PM

 

Appeals court rejects District’s request to revisit D.C. gun-control case

Source: Washington Post

A federal appeals court announced Friday that it will not revisit some of the District’s strict gun registration requirements that it struck down last fall.

A majority of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit voted against rehearing the case as a full panel. The decision upholds an earlier three-judge ruling that knocked down the city’s one-gun-per-month law, while upholding the government’s authority to issue gun regulations that promote public safety.

In denying the city’s request, Judge Patricia A. Millett — who has been mentioned as a potential nominee to replace Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia — sought to clarify her vote on a controversial topic. Millett wrote that the city had failed to fully show in court how some of its registration requirements — particularly a 15-question test on local gun laws — were sufficiently related to the government’s interest in promoting public safety.


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/appeals-court-rejects-districts-request-to-revisit-dc-gun-control-case/2016/02/26/d9cee2de-dca4-11e5-891a-4ed04f4213e8_story.html

4 replies, 1644 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 4 replies Author Time Post
Reply Appeals court rejects District’s request to revisit D.C. gun-control case (Original post)
TeddyR Feb 2016 OP
elleng Feb 2016 #1
onehandle Feb 2016 #2
TeddyR Feb 2016 #3
friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #4

Response to TeddyR (Original post)

Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:29 PM

1. 'upholding the government’s authority to issue gun regulations that promote public safety.

In denying the city’s request, Judge Patricia A. Millett — who has been mentioned as a potential nominee to replace Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia — sought to clarify her vote on a controversial topic. Millett wrote that the city had failed to fully show in court how some of its registration requirements — particularly a 15-question test on local gun laws — were sufficiently related to the government’s interest in promoting public safety.'

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeddyR (Original post)

Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:28 PM

2. GUNS! FUCK YEAH!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onehandle (Reply #2)

Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:25 PM

3. You seem inappropriately

 

Enthusiastic

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TeddyR (Reply #3)

Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:49 PM

4. "Online enthusiasm" is pretty much the sum total of gun control advocacy these days

 

That sort don't 'do'

...GOTV

...appearing at political meetings/hearings on their own dime

...spending their own money

They are, however, skilled at waiting for a authoritarian billionaire to decide what to do

The most used 'gun control advocacy device' these days is this:



It's the perfect device for the modern gun control advocate- it costs nothing, and only
requires the double click of a mouse...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread