Clinton Edges Sanders for Nevada Win, NBC News Projects
Source: NBC
Hillary Clinton will win Nevada's Democratic caucuses, NBC News projects, scoring a much-needed boost in the nomination race and depriving rival Bernie Sanders of a victory in a racially diverse state.
The loss is a blow for Sanders, who hoped to use the state's contest to prove himself as a viable candidate in a state with an electorate made up of more minority voters and fewer self-described liberals than the race's earlier contests in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Days in advance of the notoriously unpredictable contest Saturday afternoon, the former secretary of state's team had tried to downplay the significance of the Nevada results amid concerns that Sanders would pull off a win. But Clinton ultimately gathered a coalition of minority voters, self-identified Democrats and union workers to fuel her victory.
Unlike in the race's earlier primary elections, campaigns and the press were flying relatively blind going into the day's caucuses, with little reliable polling available for the state's quirky weekend mid-day caucuses.
Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/clinton-edges-sanders-nevada-win-nbc-news-projects-n522536
ericson00
(2,707 posts)SC will help put it out for good.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Big fan of low expectations, hunh?
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Your candidate wouldn't stand for anything anymore.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)In the spirit of the first post here I will say I am now looking forward to her indictment with renewed gusto.
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)Are nothing in comparison to the Heavy hitters down the Road....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1177749
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)trillion
(1,859 posts)Name 3 please.
UpInArms
(51,280 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,443 posts)Whitewater!
George II
(67,782 posts)GOLDWATER GIRL!
Kingofalldems
(38,443 posts)Fox news says she is bad!
BlueMTexpat
(15,366 posts)"partial birth abortion" which was a deal breaker for a voter in OK I spoke with this past week.
trueblue2007
(17,203 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,443 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Oh wait...that's real. Wonder what she will sell if she is POTUS?
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And if guest workers have never been protected under U.S. labor law, they never will be.
Bernie's votes was anti-exploitation.
(He carried latinos 54%-43%, btw).
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)He even went on Lou Dobbs and repeated the ridiculous claim that immigrants are taking good jobs like "lifeguard jobs."
http://www.vox.com/2016/2/12/10981234/bernie-sanders-lou-dobbs
I assume you are relying on that jacked up NBC exit poll for those Latino numbers. That same poll found that Hillary carried nonwhite voters 56% to 42%.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/primaries/NV?hootPostID=93fcba49e9326c663d378b5df0b9a011
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It proves POC(the term "nonwhite voters" is racist, btw...implying that the only thing that defines POC is a lack of white skin).
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)In any case, 42% proves Bernie is demonstrating diverse appeal.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)We'll see how much "diverse appeal" Bernie demonstrates in South Carolina.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Losing Iowa and Nevada, and with what's to come - the final race won't be nearly as close as the media would have you believe.
However, with a few days left in February, I expect folks like Andrea Mitchell to continue with their "momentum" schtick.
George II
(67,782 posts)....that toward the end of March "we'll be looking at how we can united the Party".
THAT tells me a lot!
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)the young people who are supporting Bernie in droves will not be lining up behind a candidate owned by Wall Street who promises not much more than that they might be able to refinance their student loans and they'll probably never be able to afford health insurance. Bernie voters in general don't much like her policies, and she's definitely not going to generate a whole lot of enthusiasm. I live in California and can vote for Dems down the ticket without worrying about the state's electoral votes. I guarantee voter turnout on the Dem side will be low with Clinton and some other boring moderate as her VP choice though. That coupled with the intensity with which Republicans hate her and will be looking forward to voting against her no matter which turd they nominate will spell disaster for us in November.
George II
(67,782 posts)LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)houston16revival
(953 posts)Sometimes there are not perfect choices in life. Or only seemingly bad
choices we do not like. But one must choose the least of all evils, lest
the devil wins.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)Thanks!
houston16revival
(953 posts)as rigid as any Republican. Shades of gray are very important in life
because there are very few choices which are only black and white.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)to vote for anyone closer to FDR. It makes me extremely sad to see that choice being compromised. Any of my union brothers or sisters who think the Clintons were good for unions is sadly mistaken.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)pointed out that young people supporting Bernie have little reason to get behind Hillary and that she'd have a tough time generating much enthusiasm among Bernie supporters in general. That was intrepreted as a threat by at least one Hillary voter here. No threat at all. Simply an observation based on how this primary season has shaped up. Bernie offers hope that if we band together change is possible. Hillary offers same old same old Republican lite which throws a few stale crumbs our way. Meh is right.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)everything I've thought about those young people. They're entitled, petulant children who can't think past their own noses. They don't understand what an earthquake the death of Scalia is and how important it is to make sure a Democrat replaces him. To hell with them.
mpcamb
(2,870 posts)Uh, ok, Hillary guy, but I think that's a bad call.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)ALL young people are completely ignorant of how our government works and don't realize how important this election has become? They want to put healthcare, immigration, choice, privacy, civil rights, voting rights in the hands of a republican president? And you support these people and their childish petulance?
mpcamb
(2,870 posts)" That'll just confirm everything I've thought about those young people. They're entitled, petulant children who can't think past their own noses."
If that's taken out of context, ok, but sounds to me like that's writing off the youth vote.
Likewise, saw your 'H' thing. Hillary isn't drawing well from that demographic. If I misread it, well, still looks ambiguous to me.
"...ALL young people are completely ignorant of how our government works and don't realize how important this election has become? "
Nope, quite the contrary. They'll decide the election and it'll soon be their country, not ours.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Off those voters who will skip this incredibly important election by only voting down ticket or stay home completely just because they dont get the candidate they want. I hardly ever get my candidate, I have never missed adding my voice to who nominates federal judges. It's the only thing that can't be undone. Scalias death has made this mountains more important. That the young will get off their asses and vote with any consistency still has to be proven to me. They were VERY absent in the last two off year elections.
FloridaBlues
(4,007 posts)Yes there will be unity don't kid yourselves
It happened in 2008 and no one thought it would.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)If you don't get your way, you're going to stay home and sulk. We get it.
This type of an attitude will only help the Republicans, and if you're not here to get a Democrat into the White House, then I have no interest in reading your whining.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)Yes - it looks cautiously good for her on Super Tuesday. Today is a good start in the right direction. However, Sanders still has several primaries that look good for him - Mass, Vermont (of course), and I'd expect him to do well in the Pacific Northwest.
trillion
(1,859 posts)have you ever stuck Hillarys name into google with the word fracking or monsanto after it?
That would be called vetting and voter integrity.
After that you could put her name after every progressive issue you support. Bet you wouldn't support her within an hour.
Let's try. If you go do that and come back with links, in an hour I'll put Hillarys mug on my tag for the weekend, if you still support her. Come on, integrity. Go see what you are supporting. Start with fracking. Then try monsanto, fossil fuels, climate change, for profit prison, insurance industry, and keep just googling for an hour and read what you find to get an idea of who your gal is.
You vet like this
1. bring up google
2. type in Hillary Clinton Fracking
It's easy to vet.
Tsar 1
(5 posts)Hometown Girl makes good!
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Because Bernie's Populists message of bringing the Democratic Party back to it's FDR roots scares the FUCK OUT OF THEM! Of course I would pick Hillary over a Republican in November, but face it: Hillary is the easier opponent.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)Old Vet
(2,001 posts)talk about low expectations.
George II
(67,782 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)A win is a win I grant you that
But please.
The Clinton supporters sold this as a state where Sanders would do poorly because it had a large minority population
The meme was Sanders will not do well in states will large numbers of Hispanics and African Americans
I've seen that on the news, at various websites - including this one
Don't go out and re-write history
For months Nevada was sold as a state where Clinton would win big
It was only in the last week or so that it changed to 'It maybe close'
Celebrate the victory, but at least be honest about it
question everything
(47,462 posts)Way to go Madam Secretary
ananda
(28,856 posts)Still, it's not a bad result considering what the odds were
and the way the Clinton machine works.
However, I don't think it will help him build momentum
for SC. That's a shame.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...the internets that this is what happened.
LS_Editor
(893 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)How many more deals with the Republicans do the corporate Democrats have to make? How much more suffering for the most vulnerable members of our society? How long will it take until collaborating with the right won't be tasteful anymore?
Response to George II (Original post)
CTyankee This message was self-deleted by its author.
CTyankee
(63,900 posts)ananda
(28,856 posts)... I will vote for whoever is running against any Republican!
CTyankee
(63,900 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)calguy
(5,304 posts)Us older folks have been saying the way it's going to go for quite some time now. We're not any smarter, just been around longer and have seen more elections.
In my younger years I was a hard fighter for the McGovern campaign. Reality hit between eyes when Noxin won 49 states. While I've always loved Bernie the Senator, I just can't see the viability of Bernie the presidential candidate.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)One thing Hillary will do as the nominee is fire up the Republican base who'll come out like never before to vote against her. There isn't a politician more hated by Republicans than Hillary.
And I'm in your age bracket and have seen it all, too. Bernie's straight talk, no bullshit populist message has the potential crossover appeal Hillary's tepid "no we can't" talk lacks. Good luck winning a general election when you've turned off half the voters in your own party during primary season and the opposition despises you.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Nixon won re-election on the China trip, not because people disagreed with McGovern's platform.
And if one fairly trivial Nixon dirty trick in NH was enough to destroy Ed Muskie, Muskie would have been roadkill in the fall as the nominee(I say that as someone who, at age eleven, originally preferred Muskie, btw).
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)and the caucusoidal complex. I think we've all been embiggened by this exercise.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)next clearly she seems to be a total devider . nevermind Queen Hillary is being given billions from the DNC that has nothing to do with the party anymore . Meh. not a good day for Hillary it looks like. Media spin alert
George II
(67,782 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 20, 2016, 08:54 PM - Edit history (1)
...have already voted.
He'll lose SC big, and he may win three of 11 states on Super Tuesday. By the close of the polls on March 1 he'll be more than 100 delegates behind. From that point, there is no "path to victory".
ananda
(28,856 posts)I don't know if he'll be able to do that, but I keep hoping.
The South is a huge hurdle for Sanders. Black voters love
the Clintons, and I understand why. The economy was
good for them when Bill Clinton was president.
But as things are NOW, the Clintons have moved so far
towards big money and corporate interests, that Sanders
would actually be MUCH better for Black people!
Go Sanders!
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)get excited about in the GE. Her supporters live in a fantasy world if they think that after all the dirt she and her minions have thrown at Bernie, Bernie's supporters are going to offer their enthusiastic support and financial contributions. There will instead be plenty of people going to the polls holding their noses -- voting yet again for the least objectionable candidate rather than the candidate who has their back. There will also be millions who are already licking their chops in anticipation of voting against her. No politician is more hated by Republicans than Hillary Clinton.
FloridaBlues
(4,007 posts)On to victory in March !
William769
(55,144 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)They're heavily invested in Hillary.
Gore1FL
(21,120 posts)That's about the same pyrrhic win for her that happened in 2008.
George II
(67,782 posts)Gore1FL
(21,120 posts)riversedge
(70,182 posts)GreydeeThos
(958 posts)As for delegates, Bernie has 67 while Hillary only has 483.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)that the Nation doesn't want another Clinton Either.
Don't get me wrong, I'll vote for her if she is the Nominee, But she will lose.
Hillary doesn't move or inspire anyone who doesn't already like her.
Flame away folks