Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:02 PM Feb 2016

Judge orders four more Hillary Clinton email releases

Source: Politico

A federal judge has ordered the State Department to make four additional releases of Hillary Clinton's emails between Saturday and the end of February.

U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras issued an order Thursday requiring State to release batches of the still-undisclosed portion of Clinton's emails on February 13, 19 and 26 with "all remaining documents" released by "the close of business" on February 29.

Contreras had publicly discussed the possibility of releasing some of the messages directly to the Freedom of Information Act litigant whose case the judge is overseeing, Jason Leopold of Vice News. However, the judge's order Thursday directs State to release the records on its website, as the agency has done at least once each month since May of last year.

The release schedule stretches the emails disclosures out through two upcoming contests where Clinton is competing for delegates in the Democratic presidential race: the Feb. 20 Nevada caucuses and the Feb. 27 South Carolina primaries.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/02/judge-orders-four-more-clinton-email-releases-219134

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge orders four more Hillary Clinton email releases (Original Post) Senator Tankerbell Feb 2016 OP
All this piddly crapola will be forgotten when Hillary is President. onehandle Feb 2016 #1
Depends on the FBI. If they reccomend charges she is toast. Akicita Feb 2016 #6
include the judicial system and the FBI into the 'hater' category roguevalley Feb 2016 #8
Choice to indict comes from DoJ... TipTok Feb 2016 #24
Not hardly Bernin Feb 2016 #12
It's just getting started. earthshine Feb 2016 #18
violating national security laws is ' piddly crapola'???? bowens43 Feb 2016 #32
More and more "wait and see". Duval Feb 2016 #2
She is getting less and less 'electable' by the day Senator Tankerbell Feb 2016 #3
I wish the Clinton legal problems would come to a head sooner rather than later. Vinca Feb 2016 #4
I don't think it matters at this point. Senator Tankerbell Feb 2016 #5
Very true. You notice they're saying very little about her legal woes right now. Vinca Feb 2016 #7
A very very Conservative friend of mine says they are salivating at these things right now. glinda Feb 2016 #9
Your conservative friend is salivating that our Top Secrets really were put on an unsecure server Akicita Feb 2016 #10
He is a hard core Republican. And glinda Feb 2016 #21
It's part of the plan... DUbeornot2be Feb 2016 #11
you know...that is an excellent point. glinda Feb 2016 #22
I know... DUbeornot2be Feb 2016 #31
Bernie's GE. umber are better than hers karynnj Feb 2016 #35
That she is plagued by scandal... DUbeornot2be Feb 2016 #36
The numbers I referred to are on pollingreport.com - pretty traditional karynnj Feb 2016 #39
i can't stop mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #13
Do you think the GOP won't campaign on this? Senator Tankerbell Feb 2016 #14
well no mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #15
Fair enough. Senator Tankerbell Feb 2016 #16
She better pray to her gods that there is a DEM in the WH come 2017, otherwise a GOP DOJ will dog Purveyor Feb 2016 #17
It's ugly that is how the system works... TipTok Feb 2016 #25
Hillary is safe Abouttime Feb 2016 #19
I agree. Senator Tankerbell Feb 2016 #20
I don't think any of us knows the true nature of the relationship between Clinton and Obama CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #29
The Clintons are the consummate political pros Abouttime Feb 2016 #23
She is not nearly as good as Bubba. She already lost one national election. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #26
Ummm, no. LisaM Feb 2016 #28
National election for Dem nomination in 2008. nt thereismore Feb 2016 #30
This makes a lot of sense, . . . snot Feb 2016 #33
I think the scandal will be used to justify Hillary bowing out after she is shellacked in NV and SC CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #27
^ A most likely scenario StandingInLeftField Feb 2016 #34
I don't see her suspending her campaign unless and until it's mathematically winter is coming Feb 2016 #37
I don't think she'll suspend her campaign ever. Yo_Mama Feb 2016 #38

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
8. include the judicial system and the FBI into the 'hater' category
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

heaven forbid she take the blame for her behavior

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
24. Choice to indict comes from DoJ...
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:43 PM
Feb 2016

... which has a political appointee at the head.

She'll limp through or sacrifice an aide to take the hit...

 

Bernin

(311 posts)
12. Not hardly
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:58 PM
Feb 2016

This is a glaring example of HRC's poor judgement again.

And you can bet your bottom dollar that should the DOJ refuse to indict that the first thing on the agenda will be impeachment.
HRC has no coat tails so the House and Senate will fall farther into Republican hands.

This will be the first female presidents legacy. She wont even make it to the midterm.

 

earthshine

(1,642 posts)
18. It's just getting started.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 05:30 PM
Feb 2016

If Hillary becomes president, the repubs will hound her on everything, incessantly, whether justified or not.

She will get nothing done, except that on which she and repubs agree.

 

bowens43

(16,064 posts)
32. violating national security laws is ' piddly crapola'????
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:57 PM
Feb 2016

if somehow she manages to steal both the nomination and the GE (not likely) impeachment proceedings will start on day one, as they should.

she is either criminally negligent or criminally stupid

Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
3. She is getting less and less 'electable' by the day
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:14 PM
Feb 2016

If anyone thinks the GOP isn't going to hammer on these issues, they are incredibly naive.

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
4. I wish the Clinton legal problems would come to a head sooner rather than later.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:17 PM
Feb 2016

If she ends up being the nominee and an indictment actually does come down, what the hell happens then? I wish they would either clear her or charge her and get it over with.

Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
5. I don't think it matters at this point.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:19 PM
Feb 2016

The GOP will use this as a campaign issue regardless of whether she is cleared or charged.

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
7. Very true. You notice they're saying very little about her legal woes right now.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016

If she's the nominee it's going to be like an atomic bomb blast with the Benghazi/email/whatever-else-they-can-dig-up ads.

glinda

(14,807 posts)
9. A very very Conservative friend of mine says they are salivating at these things right now.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:41 PM
Feb 2016

He does not care of for any of the Conservatives Candidates right now but is talking to political people he knows and this is for front to them. This will really be the whole Campaign for them going into elections it sounds like.

Akicita

(1,196 posts)
10. Your conservative friend is salivating that our Top Secrets really were put on an unsecure server
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:50 PM
Feb 2016

where they could be compromised and damage our national security? Does he/she consider themselves a patriot?

glinda

(14,807 posts)
21. He is a hard core Republican. And
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 01:59 AM
Feb 2016

yes...he does consider his self that but in reality he is nuts so.....like quite a few of them actually but this is how many of them think.

DUbeornot2be

(367 posts)
11. It's part of the plan...
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:51 PM
Feb 2016

...to keep Americans distracted by Hill vs. gop as the corporate overlords steal what's left... Their polling shows ratings are better with her than the socialist...

Social security, the ACA, usps, buh bye!



DUbeornot2be

(367 posts)
31. I know...
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016

...it seems far fetched but the fact is campaign finance is all based on what the broadcasters get to charge campaigns to advertise... They drive those rates up with their inflated ratings based on all the false controversies... Seems to be the root of the problem...

Talk about an artful Ponzi scheme...!

I'm sure they're busy with projections of the kind of scratch the socialist movement could bring in through targeted programming... Just like msnbc pretends to lean left when the dems are in power... It seems it all comes back to ad revenue...



karynnj

(59,498 posts)
35. Bernie's GE. umber are better than hers
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:32 PM
Feb 2016

The question I have is why TPTB made it clear this was her year. The email problem was known by the public for a year. My problem is the emails themselves are not the full problem - the entire set up was.

There had to be someone who could have been a better choice.

DUbeornot2be

(367 posts)
36. That she is plagued by scandal...
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016

...must be beneficial or they wouldn't push her so hard.

That Bernie is getting more votes doesn't necessarily relate to potential ratings seeing as his base gets their info from non traditional sources... Not necessarily people the broadcasters are interested in. We don't equal ratings and are certainly not the affluent consumer demo they cherish...

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
39. The numbers I referred to are on pollingreport.com - pretty traditional
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 06:00 PM
Feb 2016

She is plaguted by two types of scandals - made up ones, that quickly disappear and ones because she feels she can set her own rules - ie the email..

Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
14. Do you think the GOP won't campaign on this?
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:27 PM
Feb 2016

Or do you think it won't be effective if they do? I know that Democrats don't see this as an issue, I don't either, but isn't it problematic in a general election?

mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
15. well no
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:33 PM
Feb 2016

being old enough to be through a few election cycles...the problem the GOP are having is that the campaign is just going on so long and the echo chamber clanging for so long about the same things...yes the GOP campaigns on this but the voters have heard it all before and so many times that it's just meaningless campaign drival cranked out of media/superpac/campaign war rooms....unseen of course except on line...that it's just endless hot air sound and fury without meaning...etc....I am amused by the republican trolls tho...I seem to upset them...

Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
16. Fair enough.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:48 PM
Feb 2016

I'm just not as optimistic about voters tuning it out. You can already see some effect if you look at polls. Maybe it won't matter. I hope you're right. But I really I hope that we won't need to find out...

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
17. She better pray to her gods that there is a DEM in the WH come 2017, otherwise a GOP DOJ will dog
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 04:10 PM
Feb 2016

the Clintons to the end of the earth.

Senator Tankerbell

(316 posts)
20. I agree.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:25 AM
Feb 2016

But as a political matter, I think this makes her a weaker general election candidate. That is my concern.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
29. I don't think any of us knows the true nature of the relationship between Clinton and Obama
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:37 PM
Feb 2016

We can never know. We weren't there.

Clinton seems to have gone rogue in her SOS position. She made all sorts of untoward, quid-pro-quo deals with her Clinton Foundation and her corporate buddies. I doubt Obama sanctioned any of that. I think she did what she wanted.

There are countless stories in which Obama calls Libya, "Hillary's project" as if she was going rogue again. We all know that one of her closest foreign-policy advisors while she was SOS was Robert Kagan, the founder of the neocon movement.

We can look at the facts, such as these and we can guess. But we don't know.

I don't think they're as chummy as the narrative that Hillary has crafted.

 

Abouttime

(675 posts)
23. The Clintons are the consummate political pros
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:24 PM
Feb 2016

The private server was set up as a well calculated risk. Hillary knew when she became sos that she would be running for President in the future, she couldn't take the risk of having all her communications on a government system that could later be scrutinized for conflicts of interest with the Clinton Foundation. I have no doubt this move was approved at the highest levels of the Obama administration, in other words it was 'part of the deal' in Hillary signing on as sos.
Long before Hillary becomes our nominee in Philadelphia this 'scandal' will be wrapped up with Hillary coming out smelling like a rose.
President Obama controls the Dept. of Justice, look for Loretta Lynch sometime in March behind a podium absolving Hillary of any and all guilt. At that point it's game over, when asked Hillary will say "the justice dept looked into it and found no wrongdoing" end of argument.
I'm not saying i agree, I support Bernie but Hillary is on the inside track for the nomination. I'm afraid we as Democrats are just going through the motions this primary season, it's going to be Hillary, get used to it, accept it.

LisaM

(27,794 posts)
28. Ummm, no.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016

She was not the nominee. She did not lose a national election. What are you talking about?

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
27. I think the scandal will be used to justify Hillary bowing out after she is shellacked in NV and SC
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:34 PM
Feb 2016

I don't think she'll ever concede defeat to Sanders.

I think she'll suspend her campaign due to the email scandal.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
37. I don't see her suspending her campaign unless and until it's mathematically
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 04:48 PM
Feb 2016

impossible to win. Even if that FBI investigation brings forth an indictment.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
38. I don't think she'll suspend her campaign ever.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 05:52 PM
Feb 2016

I guess what happens happens. I really don't know what to think of this.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge orders four more Hi...