Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

groundloop

(11,518 posts)
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:20 PM Feb 2016

Deputies: Fla. teen dies after shooting linked to hoverboard

Source: CBS News

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Authorities in Florida say an 18-year-old lost his balance on a hoverboard and accidentally shot his 13-year-old cousin in the back of the head.

The shooting happened Sunday in Orlando. Officials say Lavardo Fisher died Monday night. The Orlando Sentinel reports Fisher was playing Xbox when he was shot..............

Deputies say the cousin told deputies he didn't mean to shoot the gun. He hasn't been charged.

The gun was owned by 35-year-old Walter Morame. He wasn't at the home when the shooting occurred but was arrested later Sunday on charges of possession of a weapon by a felon. Records don't say whether he's hired a lawyer.



Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/deputies-florida-teen-dies-after-shooting-linked-to-hoverboard/



Not a lot of details in the story, but this whole thing smells fishy.

Also, a couple of days ago a 3 year old killed a 9 year old with a weapon that was laying around and no charges were filed. In this case the only reason charges were filed was because the weapon was owned by a felon. I suppose it's a good thing that someone is facing accountability, but damn!

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deputies: Fla. teen dies after shooting linked to hoverboard (Original Post) groundloop Feb 2016 OP
one more day in gun loving America Botany Feb 2016 #1
If you think about it Plucketeer Feb 2016 #4
Xbox and hoverboard, OK. Where does the gun come in on that, and why? hobbit709 Feb 2016 #2
The answer to your question, in just one word... turbo_satan Feb 2016 #3
Was he riding a hoverboard with a loaded gun? William Seger Feb 2016 #29
We've really got to do something about hoverboards. bluedigger Feb 2016 #5
First We Must Ban Swimming Pools & Cars SoCalMusicLover Feb 2016 #26
Why wouldn't the shooting be linked to A FUCKIN' GUN????? valerief Feb 2016 #6
Hush!! padfun Feb 2016 #7
DING!! DING!! DING!! DING!! DING!! groundloop Feb 2016 #8
So sick of the excuses... louis-t Feb 2016 #9
If he's a felon, he's done. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #15
In Other Words He'll Be Out In No Time SoCalMusicLover Feb 2016 #27
Potentially. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #28
Who rides a hover board with a gun left-of-center2012 Feb 2016 #10
Exactly my point ... the story is fishy as hell groundloop Feb 2016 #11
Before we allowed so many guns this type of accident was jwirr Feb 2016 #12
Agreed. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #16
My family also own guns and we have a huge safe that we jwirr Feb 2016 #18
Same. Its such cheap insurance for human life. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #21
The 18 year old should get charged with Manslaughter. Man 2 at least. maxsolomon Feb 2016 #13
Hello gun person who said gun accidents are very rare. lark Feb 2016 #14
I don't think this one will be classified as an accident. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #17
Disagree. lark Feb 2016 #19
I don't think I'm alone in classifying that as negligence. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #22
Yes... because the ultimate consequence was objectively, not intentional. LanternWaste Feb 2016 #23
I would accept 'accident' as a euphamism. AtheistCrusader Feb 2016 #24
Accident , but if you drove your car into another car demigoddess Feb 2016 #25
Perfect! lark Feb 2016 #30
What a shame. mac2766 Feb 2016 #20

William Seger

(10,778 posts)
29. Was he riding a hoverboard with a loaded gun?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:44 PM
Feb 2016

WTF did the kid think he was doing -- inventing a new Olympic sport? Whoever left the gun accessible to such irresponsibility bears equal responsibility for this, IMO.

louis-t

(23,292 posts)
9. So sick of the excuses...
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:06 PM
Feb 2016

Didn't mean to fire the gun? Oh, well then, that makes it all better.
Didn't know the gun was loaded.
Didn't know the kids were coming over so left the gun out.
I was just cleaning it.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
15. If he's a felon, he's done.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:46 PM
Feb 2016

Zero excuses will be accepted.

He won't be charged with the death though. Just 'Felon in possession'. Which is sad. This was negligence ON TOP of being legally ineligible to have a gun.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
27. In Other Words He'll Be Out In No Time
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:39 PM
Feb 2016

Wanna bet the FIRST thing he does when he gets out? Gotta replace that gun right away.

groundloop

(11,518 posts)
11. Exactly my point ... the story is fishy as hell
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:14 PM
Feb 2016

Plus, the 18 year old would be charged as an adult.... I'm astounded that he's not facing involuntary manslaughter at the very least.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
12. Before we allowed so many guns this type of accident was
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:14 PM
Feb 2016

very common. A gun easily accessed by children with the expected results. I do not remember charges being filed back then. It was considered an accident.

I do think that we were wrong back then in the sense of whoever left a gun laying around should have been charged with some type of crime - at the very least negligence.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
16. Agreed.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:48 PM
Feb 2016

There are criminal negligence statutes around, but they are rarely employed in this case, and I do not understand why.

Honestly, as a gun owner, it boggles my mind. Safe storage and criminal charges for incidence like this seems like a no-brainer. Also, seems fully constitutional.

So do it.

maxsolomon

(33,310 posts)
13. The 18 year old should get charged with Manslaughter. Man 2 at least.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:23 PM
Feb 2016

He's an adult; he's responsible for his actions. not meaning to do it isn't an excuse.

Walter Morame needs to go upstate for a decade.

"Enforce the laws on the books" is what the Gunners always say.

This is the America Guns have made. Pew pew!

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
17. I don't think this one will be classified as an accident.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:50 PM
Feb 2016

I'm not sure it should be, either.

Traditionally, 'accident' would involve something like crossing a fence, and dropping your shotgun, or fumbling for it if it fell, etc, somehow causing it to discharge.

Riding on a hoverboard, finger on the trigger, safety off, pointing it at your friend and pulling the trigger doesn't seem like... 'an accident' to me.

lark

(23,091 posts)
19. Disagree.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:53 PM
Feb 2016

Think that's just nitpicking the meaning of the word accident. When someone is driving a car too fast and wreck, it's not called an intentional wreck, it's an accident. The person didn't mean to do it but was taking risks and it backfired on them. Same thing here. While it was very stupid, it wasn't intentional and so it was an accident.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
22. I don't think I'm alone in classifying that as negligence.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:59 PM
Feb 2016

I wouldn't call that an accident either.

an undesirable or unfortunate happening that occurs unintentionally and usually results in harm, injury, damage, or loss; casualty; mishap:
automobile accidents.


That 'unintentionally' suggests to me, operating within tolerance when something bad happens. If you make a deliberate choice to exceed, for instance the posted speed limit, and then something bad happens, is it still 'unintentional'?
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
23. Yes... because the ultimate consequence was objectively, not intentional.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:12 PM
Feb 2016

then something bad happens, is it still 'unintentional'?"

Yes... because the ultimate consequence (death) was objectively, not intentional as contrasted to the subsidiary consequence (riding the board in a negligent manner). Additional adjectives may or course, be applied.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
24. I would accept 'accident' as a euphamism.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:16 PM
Feb 2016

Something we use in conversation. Not as a criminal/accidental public health data classification system.

In that context, this should fall under negligence or criminal negligence. It's a very different thing than a gun that was say, dropped, and went off when it hit the ground, and the round hit someone. Someone is still responsible in that case, but the mechanism and intent is very different than 'I pulled the trigger but I didn't mean for it to go off'.

demigoddess

(6,640 posts)
25. Accident , but if you drove your car into another car
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:31 PM
Feb 2016

you would have to pay for it through insurance or a lawsuit. Why not the same for guns which 'accidentally' go off. As I understand it if I have an accident that results in death, I still have to pay a penalty, either civil or criminal. Especially if I am breaking the law at the time, speeding for example. Cars are considered necessary for life, guns not so much. We don't hunt for our dinner these days.

lark

(23,091 posts)
30. Perfect!
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:00 PM
Feb 2016

What I'd really like to see is registering for guns like you do for a car, along with having to pass a written and target test first. Guns would have to be insured as well, again like cars, and the license would be suspended for any illegal use of the gun.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Deputies: Fla. teen dies ...