Putin is 'picture of corruption': US Treasury official
Source: Yahoo! News / AFP
London (AFP) - A senior US Treasury official has directly accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of corruption, in a BBC programme.
The US government imposed sanctions against a number of Kremlin insiders in 2014 after Russia's annexation of Crimea in Ukraine, but did not accuse Putin of direct involvement in corruption.
However, during a Panorama investigation into Putin's "secret riches", Adam Szubin, the acting under secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence at the US Treasury said Putin was a "picture of corruption".
"We've seen him enriching his friends, his close allies, and marginalising those who he doesn't view as friends using state assets," Szubin, who oversees US Treasury sanctions, told the Panorama programme, in an unusually strong statement from the government on Putin's personal finances.
Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/putin-picture-corruption-us-treasury-offical-200629826.html
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)This guy would score high on a psychopathology test, and republicans here love him.
63splitwindow
(2,657 posts)repugs love to believe President Obama is Putin's whipping boy. Scum traitors.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)Bernin
(311 posts)Coming from a "US Treasury Official". Considering the US treasury was drained beyond repair to bail out a bunch of crooked, mostly European, bankers.
When is the last time anyone actually saw some gold in Fort Knox???
This comedy writes itself.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Bernin
(311 posts)ink on paper is not very nutritious and always has a way of becoming worthless.
Fractional Reserve Currency established so each consecutive generation works harder for less.
Hrmmm,
Not sure that's a real Democratic principle that you're pushing there. But if it makes you smile please proceed.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)learned, and start a new society based on libertarian thinking so we can get to the point that we say, "our society sucks so bad and we need regulation."
Even the pilgrims had rules.
Bernin
(311 posts)But, was it not Nixon that abolished the gold standard?
Of what party was he a member???
And what's with the Libertarian tangent you're on? Where did that come from?
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Bernin
(311 posts)If it's there why not let the Senators that have asked to see it, see it?
Since you assume I'm Libertarian I'm going to assume you're a Nixon Republican by your failure to address that a Republican abandoned the gold standard.
See how that works?
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)It was important in ending the Great Depression .
Bernin
(311 posts)FDR issued silver certificates. You could still demand that the bank give you silver for your paper currency.
Edited to add:
It even stated as such on the bills.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Bernin
(311 posts)But, not that old.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)I still have them.
Bernin
(311 posts)The only collectible paper currency I have is a One Deception Note with W's picture on it.
happyslug
(14,779 posts)Technically till 1968 you could trade in Silver Certificates for Silver (Silver only after 1964, Silver Coins before 1964) but since 1968 all you would get is a Federal Reserve Note of the same amount (i.e a One Dollar Silver Certificate will get you a One Dollar Federal Reserve Note).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_certificate_(United_States)#End_of_the_silver_certificates
Sorry, the Courts have long ruled that such bills, Gold Certificates or Silver Certificates, can be only exchanged for the same amount of Federal Reserve Notes.
As of December 2013 the Federal Reserve reported holding $11.037 billion face value of these certificates. The Treasury backs these certificates by holding an equivalent amount of gold at the statutory exchange rate of $42 2/9 per troy ounce of gold, though the Federal Reserve does not have the right to exchange the certificates for gold. As the certificates are denominated in dollars rather than in a set weight of gold, any change in the statutory exchange rate towards the (much higher) market rate would result in a windfall accounting gain for the Treasury.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_certificate
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Yavin4
(35,437 posts)rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Bernin
(311 posts)would not consider camo pants fashionable enough to make one narcissistic.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)It was a beauty picture . The camo pants are macho. If Putin were gay, he would do the same thing. Maybe he is gay. I don't know. He sure acts like he hates gay people.
Bernin
(311 posts)I don't see a horse.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Bernin
(311 posts)Think they are majestic animals. Not going to hate anyone for riding a horse without a shirt. If my shirt gets soaked with sweat I take it off too.
Not sure anyone would want to see a picture of me that way though.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)because anyone with sense would not back a Putin beauty pageant. Well played my friend.
Bernin
(311 posts)Thanks for the volley.
Slow night over here.
Go Bernie!
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Response to Yavin4 (Reply #3)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bernin
(311 posts)the bill boards that had Bushie's picture and the term "Our Leader" on the highways all over the country.
newthinking
(3,982 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)Response to Little Tich (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
HeiressofBickworth
(2,682 posts)surrounding the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, see Vanity Fair, February 2014 article, Putin's Run For Gold.
From the article:
"At $50 billion and counting, the 2014 Winter Olympics, in Sochi, will be the most expensive Olympic Games ever. Intended to showcase the power of Vladimir Putin's Russia, they may instead highlight its problems: organized crime, state corruption, and the terrorist threat within its borders."
"Beneath every modern Russian achievement lies a hidden story that may be more telling. In Sochi, the hidden story is about Putin, and about the small circle around him, who have profited handsomely from the construction."
"Putin has built himself two massive chalets, two helipads, a power station and two ski lifts, servicing surrounding peaks, According to UNESCO, the Russian state built a private dacha on a UNESCO site under the guise of conducting meteorological research."
According to the article, his circle of friends started in St. Petersberg and have followed him to Moscow, all the while, reaping the rewards of government contracts.
It's an interesting read.
KG
(28,751 posts)stonecutter357
(12,695 posts)Nihil
(13,508 posts)Seriously?
What next? A Nigerian Banker calling J.P.Morgan's CEO "corrupt"?
A pot calling the kettle "black"?
> "We've seen him enriching his friends, his close allies, and marginalising
> those who he doesn't view as friends using state assets"
Presumably whilst working for the US administration with his eyes shut?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)similar to that of Putin's regime?
Nihil
(13,508 posts)He decided (or was "encouraged" to retain sufficient numbers of Bush
officials across the board so I would say that, in general, his administration
is as corrupt as his various predecessors - yes, including Clinton, Bush I and
going back as far as the patronage policies ("Oh, that's not corruption" of
the Founding Fathers.
There have undoubtably been worse ones.
There may or may not have been better ones.
Neither of those - nor your specific charge - are my point.
I am saying that a "Senior US Treasury Official" is in absolutely no position
to make comments about corruption as that person has been wading through
it for their entire career - regardless of who is sat in the Oval Office.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"I am saying that a "Senior US Treasury Official" is in absolutely no position to make comments about corruption..."
I see no reason why one person covered in mud would be unable to observe and comment on someone else covered in mud. Unless of course, you predicate all criticism on purity and righteousness of ethics rather than validity of observation, testing and measurement).
("Shooting the messenger" is a subdivision of the ad hominem logical fallacy. Source: Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic)
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)his allies? Of abusing the legal process to persecute political enemies?
pampango
(24,692 posts)A rightwing authoritarian leader who attacks civil liberties, stigmatises lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, indulges in chauvinistic nationalism, is in bed with rapacious oligarchs, and who is admired by the European and American hard right. Leftwing opposition to Vladimir Putin should be, well, kind of an obvious starting point.
Putin has become something of an icon for a certain type of western rightwinger. Donald Trump is a fan: when Putin called the rightwing demagogue a very colourful, talented person, Trump called it a great honour and described Russias strongman as a man highly respected within his own country and beyond. When challenged on the alleged role of Moscow in the murder of journalists, Trump engaged in what is typically known as whataboutery (or the look over there! approach to debate), responding: Our country does plenty of killing also.
Last year, a delegation of French rightwing MPs visited Russia to fight disinformation from western media, and Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front which was given a multimillion-euro loan from a Russian bank is a Putin fan. Our own Nigel Farage assailed opposition to Russias invasion of Ukraine, suggesting Putin was on our side in the war against terrorism, while Ukip MEP Diane James celebrated him as a strong leader and for being very nationalist.
But for universalists those of us who believe democracy, freedom, human rights and social justice are universal principles that all humans should enjoy, irrespective of who or where they are that shouldnt be good enough. We shouldnt have to wait for a possible western-Russian alliance in, say, Syria to speak out. We should express our solidarity with Russias embattled democrats and leftists.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/26/vladimir-putin-russia-oligarch-british-left-speak-out
uhnope
(6,419 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)when talking about Putin and Russia. They both admire and envy him. He's basically a superior version of Bush, but playing for another team.