Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Thu May 31, 2012, 10:35 AM May 2012

In Milwaukee Post, Cardinal Authorized Paying Abusers

Source: NY Times

Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York authorized payments of as much as $20,000 to sexually abusive priests as an incentive for them to agree to dismissal from the priesthood when he was the archbishop of Milwaukee.

Questioned at the time about the news that one particularly notorious pedophile cleric had been given a “payoff” to leave the priesthood, Cardinal Dolan, then the archbishop, responded that such an inference was “false, preposterous and unjust.”

But a document unearthed during bankruptcy proceedings for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee and made public by victims’ advocates reveals that the archdiocese did make such payments to multiple accused priests to encourage them to seek dismissal, thereby allowing the church to remove them from the payroll.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/31/us/cardinal-authorized-payments-to-abusers.html?_r=1&hp

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Milwaukee Post, Cardinal Authorized Paying Abusers (Original Post) SecularMotion May 2012 OP
X-posted in religion. :) nt daaron May 2012 #1
Paying for contraception...NO atreides1 May 2012 #2
u r so right! april May 2012 #13
Both the Cardinal and the Priest Should be in Jail dynasaw May 2012 #3
Doland is an obnoxious, obese slob run of the mill example of today's hierarchy. olegramps May 2012 #4
Isn't Dolan the guy running around whining about being "forced" to take birth control pills? gratuitous May 2012 #5
Ah, is it so bad a thing? malthaussen May 2012 #6
WT everlovin' F??!! Pat Riot May 2012 #7
Name me a time *any* institution has admitted to a wrong. malthaussen May 2012 #9
$20,000 hush money vs $60,000 on a watch for a cardinal? classic false choice logic fallacy. yellowcanine May 2012 #12
Actually, not malthaussen May 2012 #14
And that is exculpatory how? The fact that institutions may not admit wrongdoing - and actually yellowcanine May 2012 #18
The money was not to "get them away", it was to get them to agree to defrocking. yellowcanine May 2012 #11
That's the point malthaussen May 2012 #15
No they could have defrocked them without their permission as well as removed them. yellowcanine May 2012 #17
But as you already said, they couldn't defrock them without a scandal. malthaussen May 2012 #19
And avoidance of scandal is not an acceptable reason for doing the wrong thing. We have a term yellowcanine May 2012 #20
The difficulty here, yellowcanine malthaussen May 2012 #22
I wouldn't say you were excusing the conduct so much as enabling it. yellowcanine May 2012 #23
Oh, I see your objection now. malthaussen May 2012 #25
Rapists will still find a way to rape. Removing them from the church won't stop their predations riderinthestorm May 2012 #35
Great - don't try them for there criminal behavior - turn them loose on the public. Very Christian. jwirr May 2012 #8
Sure they found other kids, easy when they're not on the sex offenders registry, either. freshwest May 2012 #24
I just read another post that one of them in now working for TSA doing body searches. jwirr May 2012 #26
Okay, you're pulling my leg here... Aren't you? freshwest May 2012 #27
No, it was in either the front page here or GDiscussion. I do not know how to link things so did not jwirr May 2012 #28
Oh, okay, I just figured these guys would be too old to make the schedule, you know. freshwest May 2012 #29
We are all doing fine. Warm weather is finally back. Tired of cold spring weather here in NE MN. jwirr May 2012 #31
Same weather here. Had to turn the heat on and up the lights. Dark day again. freshwest May 2012 #32
I hate turning the heat back on. Cost too much. Oh, well I suppose I will be complaining when it is jwirr May 2012 #33
Fortunately, electric is the lowest of all my bills, but I conserve as much as possible. freshwest May 2012 #34
Dolan is indeed a leader on the misogenous team of the catholic church's evil organization. hue May 2012 #10
It made me sick Worried senior May 2012 #16
The "Faithful" atreides1 May 2012 #21
I would like to see the Vatican and all it's corruption bulldozed to the ground Marrah_G May 2012 #30
Look up "Hypocrite", and there's Dolan in 3-D jumping out at you. nt DCKit Jun 2012 #36

atreides1

(16,046 posts)
2. Paying for contraception...NO
Thu May 31, 2012, 10:54 AM
May 2012

Paying off child raping Priests...YES.

I guess we see where the good Cardinal's preferences are, and who he supports!

dynasaw

(998 posts)
3. Both the Cardinal and the Priest Should be in Jail
Thu May 31, 2012, 11:16 AM
May 2012

The cardinal should have turned the offending priest to the police not paid him off. He didn't and in essence abetted in a crime.

Men of god indeed . . .

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
5. Isn't Dolan the guy running around whining about being "forced" to take birth control pills?
Thu May 31, 2012, 11:27 AM
May 2012

I wonder if the good Cardinal will still be making the rounds of the teevee shows now that this has come out? I suppose he will; it's not like any of the blow-dried puffheads would dare to interrupt his compulsive eating of birth control pills by asking him about paying hush money to pedophiles.

malthaussen

(17,065 posts)
6. Ah, is it so bad a thing?
Thu May 31, 2012, 11:44 AM
May 2012

Think about it. In the absence of justice being administered to these people -- and let's be grownups, they will never see justice in this world -- is $20,000 so much to pay to get them away from more victims to rape? I suppose the counter-argument to that would be that the diocese would just put another child molester in their place...

-- Mal

Pat Riot

(446 posts)
7. WT everlovin' F??!!
Thu May 31, 2012, 12:12 PM
May 2012

You're out of your mind. Wrong in too many ways to list.

For one thing, they don't have to agree to dismissal. Just defrock 'em, excommunicate 'em, the end.
It's all about the church's inability to admit they're at fault. Spending all the money on crazy shit like this, as well as the legal defense of these god damned rapists of children ( which has led to the closing of many neighborhood, small ethnic churches which actually do some good in communities) instead on spending it on helping the victims. All because they won't admit to the crime, or as they call it, sin.

I am a grown up, and I have thought about it a lot.

malthaussen

(17,065 posts)
9. Name me a time *any* institution has admitted to a wrong.
Thu May 31, 2012, 12:26 PM
May 2012

Admitting to institutional error is incompatible with being an institution. Do you really need examples multiplied? Nothing would make me happier than seeing these people hanged, drawn and quartered in the public square. Or preferably imprisoned in a glass cage in front of their church, where they slowly and publicly starve to death.

It ain't gonna happen.

Waste of good money? Yeah, but I'd rather waste $20,000 to get a child rapist out of a position where his victims are supplied to him, than $60,000 on a watch for a cardinal. My priorities must be screwed up.

-- Mal

malthaussen

(17,065 posts)
14. Actually, not
Thu May 31, 2012, 01:05 PM
May 2012

I'm not claiming that the dichotomy is a necessary one. Perhaps I should have said "The church wastes so much money on stuff that doesn't matter, it's nice to see them waste it on something that might have a collateral good effect."

-- Mal

yellowcanine

(35,692 posts)
18. And that is exculpatory how? The fact that institutions may not admit wrongdoing - and actually
Thu May 31, 2012, 01:47 PM
May 2012

they do - The Catholic Church itself has apologized for the Inquisition, among other things - is no excuse for failure to do the right thing.

yellowcanine

(35,692 posts)
11. The money was not to "get them away", it was to get them to agree to defrocking.
Thu May 31, 2012, 12:39 PM
May 2012

It circumvented the process, kind of like a plea bargain. Had the church gone ahead with the defrocking, the result would have been the same BUT - this is important, the information about the crimes would have been more likely to come out.

malthaussen

(17,065 posts)
15. That's the point
Thu May 31, 2012, 01:07 PM
May 2012

Obviously, the idea was to keep things quiet, there's nothing shocking about that. But defrocking the priests and removing them from their positions would have the byproduct of removing them from their pool of victims.

Point being, unintended good is still good.

-- Mal

yellowcanine

(35,692 posts)
17. No they could have defrocked them without their permission as well as removed them.
Thu May 31, 2012, 01:39 PM
May 2012

Same result without paying any hush money. Anyway, as I understand it the priests were already removed, the point of the defrocking is that it is much harder to come back as a priest ever again. But keeping things quiet is shocking, at least it should be. Because by doing that the ex-priest will be more likely to be able to move on and quietly take a position in another field that again allows access to children. Not all employers are as careful as they should be and by voluntarily giving up the priesthood the ex-priest may be able to hide the real reason he left. Not being a priest anymore is not going to stop him from trying to game the system to find more victims.

By not alerting the public to these pedophiles the church commits a sin of omission, which is every bit as much of a sin as the rest of the cover up.

malthaussen

(17,065 posts)
19. But as you already said, they couldn't defrock them without a scandal.
Thu May 31, 2012, 01:49 PM
May 2012

The institution will not admit to error. That is -- excuse me -- the cardinal point. It cannot, must not, will not admit to the error. Such being the case, there must be no scandal -- that is not "shocking," just terrible. Or it should not be shocking, I say, if one is a grownup. It's just the way things work. Now, if you want to change the way things work, I'm behind that all the way.

Sure, the priest can find his victims elsewhere, but at least he will not have them readily-supplied by virtue of his position as priest. I agree, it would be so much better if reality allowed for these people to be exposed and brought to justice. But under the existing circumstances, which would you rather: that they remain the spiritual advisors of their communities, and continue to predate on their charges, or that they be forced to the street to find their own way?

Sadly, this argument is much the same as the one used to defend the President when he makes a bad deal with the Republicans: he got the best he could get. That really stinks, if you're an idealist.

-- Mal

yellowcanine

(35,692 posts)
20. And avoidance of scandal is not an acceptable reason for doing the wrong thing. We have a term
Thu May 31, 2012, 02:04 PM
May 2012

for that. It is called a "cover up". And as has been said many times, a cover up is as much a crime as the original crime.

"But under the existing circumstances, which would you rather: that they remain the spiritual advisors of their communities, and continue to predate on their charges, or that they be forced to the street to find their own way?"

Again, a false choice. And please don't split hairs - when you propose two alternatives without mentioning the other possibilities as a solution to a problem it is a false choice.

The notion that "institutions will not admit to error" is not a convincing argument. Of course they don't want to. And they certainly will not if we give them a pass every time they quietly pay someone off rather than admitting error. Sorry, it is not acceptable. Hush money is wrong. Avoiding scandal by paying up and allowing a pedophile to proceed his merry way is wrong. And where do the victims fit in to this little scenario? They get no justice because the scandal is hushed up. That is error, whether the institution wants to admit it or not.

malthaussen

(17,065 posts)
22. The difficulty here, yellowcanine
Thu May 31, 2012, 02:23 PM
May 2012

... is that you appear to think I'm trying to excuse the conduct. I'm not, I'm saying it is not wholly without benefits.

If the institution had moral courage, honesty, a commitment to what is right... we wouldn't be having this conversation. But these features are not, usually, present in institutions. That is the fundamental flaw of institutional thinking.

It is not a flaw confined to a particular institution: Pennsylvania State University has displayed much the same courage, honesty, and commitment to what is right. But as it is a much less powerful institution than the Catholic Church, it has been forced to find scapegoats to blame for its scandal. Should the Church also be forced to submit to public disapprobation, I'll be the first to cheer. But I doubt it will happen. The Church appears to be as isolated from public opinion as the Republican Party.

-- Mal

yellowcanine

(35,692 posts)
23. I wouldn't say you were excusing the conduct so much as enabling it.
Thu May 31, 2012, 02:46 PM
May 2012

Which would not be so much of a problem if there were not victims. Victims deserve more consideration than this regardless of how inconvenient it is. And getting justice for current victims will make it less likely there will be future victims, not more. The Church took the easy way out with little regard for the victims, current or future.

malthaussen

(17,065 posts)
25. Oh, I see your objection now.
Thu May 31, 2012, 03:15 PM
May 2012

Yeah, that would piss me off, too.

I'm not saying "That's the way it is, we should just let it go." I'm saying "That's the way it is -- it shouldn't be shocking to anyone with eyes to see." What bothers me is the appearence of amazement -- as if such behavior were not unthinkable. It is not just not unthinkable, it is common. It is not just common, it is regular practice. I believe (this is opinion) that it is a necessary consequence of the concept of institutionalization, and I mean "necessary" in the sense of logical necessity. People in institutions behave in a certain way because that is how they have to think to succeed.

If Congressman Anthony Wiener had, at the outset of the scandal, freely admitted what he had done, and challenged the people and the party with the question "what's so bad about it," do you think he might not have gotten more sympathy, even approval, from the masses? But instead he did what every politician, every priest, every corporate spokesman has done since time immemorial: lied, lied, and lied, and when the truth came out, was treated with derision and disdain. Now, wouldn't you think an intelligent human would have seen that coming? Wouldn't you think an intelligent human would have considered trying another tactic, just because history has shown that cover-ups don't work? But he went the route everyone else always does. Pourquoi? Because he's a coward and a fool? Possibly, but isn't it just as possible he acted that way because he was conditioned to do so by the environment in which he operates? All of which is a long-winded digression to illustrate the idea that it is not the particular institution (or individual) who is wholly to blame, but the idea of institutions altogether. (Of course, this could be seen as some kind of apologia for the individuals involved, which it is not intended to be: a man acts, and by his acts you shall know him. It would be great if more people showed moral courage. But then, if it were common, it would hardly be courage anymore, would it?)

I'm all for our justice system exerting every sinew to bring these criminals to book. I'm just not holding my breath.

-- Mal

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
35. Rapists will still find a way to rape. Removing them from the church won't stop their predations
Thu May 31, 2012, 07:07 PM
May 2012

it simply removes the church's responsibility for the predator.

The child rapes will still go on.

Honestly, the thought that the church paid these guys to get them off the Vatican rolls but did nothing about prosecuting or punishing them is even worse imho. They completely abdicated their responsibility to society by releasing these guys onto the population at large.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
28. No, it was in either the front page here or GDiscussion. I do not know how to link things so did not
Thu May 31, 2012, 03:38 PM
May 2012

even try. Sorry. At 70 years old I am glad I know how to do what I can on a computer.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
29. Oh, okay, I just figured these guys would be too old to make the schedule, you know.
Thu May 31, 2012, 03:47 PM
May 2012

You're a bit older than me,. I get tired of being on the computer when people just seem to want to fight over minutiae. Hope you're doing okay over there and the family's okay as well, if I'm talking to the same person I think you are.


jwirr

(39,215 posts)
31. We are all doing fine. Warm weather is finally back. Tired of cold spring weather here in NE MN.
Thu May 31, 2012, 04:14 PM
May 2012

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
32. Same weather here. Had to turn the heat on and up the lights. Dark day again.
Thu May 31, 2012, 04:23 PM
May 2012

It will likely carry on through the 4th of July, it generally is chilly then.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
33. I hate turning the heat back on. Cost too much. Oh, well I suppose I will be complaining when it is
Thu May 31, 2012, 04:40 PM
May 2012

80 degrees.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
34. Fortunately, electric is the lowest of all my bills, but I conserve as much as possible.
Thu May 31, 2012, 04:53 PM
May 2012

We don't seem to be able to get very warm right now, it's been cool and dark for a long time. I hope at least you are getting plenty of sunshine.

hue

(4,949 posts)
10. Dolan is indeed a leader on the misogenous team of the catholic church's evil organization.
Thu May 31, 2012, 12:33 PM
May 2012

See how they systematically lie, care more about $$ than people, and protect/cover their own child raping a$$es:


Worried senior

(1,328 posts)
16. It made me sick
Thu May 31, 2012, 01:23 PM
May 2012

when Dolan was in WI to say mass at holy hill. The faithful were there like sheep to the slaughter.

atreides1

(16,046 posts)
21. The "Faithful"
Thu May 31, 2012, 02:22 PM
May 2012

Faithful to the church, a man made institution...the world can do without that kind of "Faith"!

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
30. I would like to see the Vatican and all it's corruption bulldozed to the ground
Thu May 31, 2012, 04:03 PM
May 2012

I would like the his highness the pope and all his little noblemen have to TRULY take vows of poverty instead of living in splendor, wanting and working for nothing while pillaging the earnings of millions of sheep.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»In Milwaukee Post, Cardin...