Scientists Seek Moratorium on Edits to Human Genome That Could Be Inherited
Source: NY Times
DEC. 3, 2015
An international group of scientists meeting in Washington called on Thursday for what would, in effect, be a moratorium on making inheritable changes to the human genome.
The group said it would be irresponsible to proceed until the risks could be better assessed and until there was broad societal consensus about the appropriateness of any proposed change. The group also held open the possibility for such work to proceed in the future by saying that as knowledge advances, the issue of making permanent changes to the human genome should be revisited on a regular basis.
The meeting was convened by the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, the Institute of Medicine, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of London. The academies have no regulatory power, but their moral authority on this issue seems very likely to be accepted by scientists in most or all countries. Similar restraints proposed in 1975 on an earlier form of gene manipulation by an international scientific meeting in California were observed by the worlds scientists.
<snip>
The meeting was prompted by a new genetic technique, invented three years ago, that enables DNA to be edited with unprecedented ease and precision. The technique, known as Crispr-Cas9 and now widely accessible, would allow physicians to alter the human germline, which includes the eggs and the sperm, to cure genetic disease or even enhance desirable physical or mental traits.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/science/crispr-cas9-human-genome-editing-moratorium.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0
Squinch
(50,916 posts)Nitram
(22,768 posts)They try to anticipate and minimize risks. They now have an incredibly powerful tool for curing disease and addressing other issues, but need to assess the downside before proceeding down the road of inheritable changes. Some inheritable changes, such as those related to disease carried by specific genes, would be completely safe. Others could be dangerous or raise ethical concerns.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Nitram
(22,768 posts)They tried to minimize risk and prevent harm.