Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

inanna

(3,547 posts)
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 03:50 AM Dec 2015

Scientists Seek Moratorium on Edits to Human Genome That Could Be Inherited

Source: NY Times

DEC. 3, 2015

An international group of scientists meeting in Washington called on Thursday for what would, in effect, be a moratorium on making inheritable changes to the human genome.

The group said it would be “irresponsible to proceed” until the risks could be better assessed and until there was “broad societal consensus about the appropriateness” of any proposed change. The group also held open the possibility for such work to proceed in the future by saying that as knowledge advances, the issue of making permanent changes to the human genome “should be revisited on a regular basis.”

The meeting was convened by the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, the Institute of Medicine, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Royal Society of London. The academies have no regulatory power, but their moral authority on this issue seems very likely to be accepted by scientists in most or all countries. Similar restraints proposed in 1975 on an earlier form of gene manipulation by an international scientific meeting in California were observed by the world’s scientists.

<snip>

The meeting was prompted by a new genetic technique, invented three years ago, that enables DNA to be edited with unprecedented ease and precision. The technique, known as Crispr-Cas9 and now widely accessible, would allow physicians to alter the human germline, which includes the eggs and the sperm, to cure genetic disease or even enhance desirable physical or mental traits.


Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/science/crispr-cas9-human-genome-editing-moratorium.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scientists Seek Moratorium on Edits to Human Genome That Could Be Inherited (Original Post) inanna Dec 2015 OP
Could be paraphrased as, "Scientists desperately try to put the cat back in the bag." Squinch Dec 2015 #1
Scientists never try to put the cat back in the bag. Nitram Dec 2015 #2
COUNTEREXAMPLE: Nuclear physics regulations and restrictions? (nt) proverbialwisdom Dec 2015 #3
Never even tried to"put it back in the bag". Because you can never do that. Nitram Dec 2015 #4

Nitram

(22,768 posts)
2. Scientists never try to put the cat back in the bag.
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:09 PM
Dec 2015

They try to anticipate and minimize risks. They now have an incredibly powerful tool for curing disease and addressing other issues, but need to assess the downside before proceeding down the road of inheritable changes. Some inheritable changes, such as those related to disease carried by specific genes, would be completely safe. Others could be dangerous or raise ethical concerns.

Nitram

(22,768 posts)
4. Never even tried to"put it back in the bag". Because you can never do that.
Fri Dec 4, 2015, 02:20 PM
Dec 2015

They tried to minimize risk and prevent harm.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scientists Seek Moratoriu...