Thu Dec 3, 2015, 01:42 PM
Rose Siding (32,623 posts)
Harry Reid On Gun Violence: Congress Is ‘Complicit Through Our Inaction’
Source: Huff Po
WASHINGTON -- Just as he did two months ago, after a mass shooting in Oregon, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) took angrily to the Senate floor Thursday to once again advocate for gun control legislation. He asked his colleagues to “take a long, hard look this morning, maybe in the mirror, and ask themselves, 'Where do I stand?'" after Wednesday’s mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that killed 14 people. “We as the legislative body of this country do nothing. So I have a question for every member of this body: How can we live with ourselves for failing to do the things we know that will reduce gun violence?” Reid said. “Will it get rid of all of it? Of course not. But will it reduce it? Yes. We're complicit through our inaction, and if we continue to fail to act, we'll be complicit today and every day into the future," he added. We'll keep ending up right where we are, mourning innocent victims in San Bernardino, California, or Charleston or Newtown. When the victims turn to us for help, we'll have nothing to show but empty hands and a few empty gestures. It's despicable.” ... "Now, there was a time in my legislative career that I tried to work with the National Rifle Association. But the NRA today is a far cry from a sportsman's organization that I once supported. The NRA once called mandates for background checks reasonable," Reid said. "I'm not making this up. Now they are transformed in a quasi-militant wing of the Republican party." Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/harry-reid-gun-violence-nra_56605e55e4b08e945fee3ad9 I'm going to miss Harry.
|
5 replies, 950 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Rose Siding | Dec 2015 | OP |
patsimp | Dec 2015 | #1 | |
Dont call me Shirley | Dec 2015 | #2 | |
flamingdem | Dec 2015 | #3 | |
question everything | Dec 2015 | #4 | |
houston16revival | Dec 2015 | #5 |
Response to Rose Siding (Original post)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 01:45 PM
patsimp (915 posts)
1. They definitely are.
Response to Rose Siding (Original post)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 01:50 PM
Dont call me Shirley (10,998 posts)
2. The gun manufacturer's lobbyists are the connivers who buy the congresscritters (and they are
too virtuously weak to refuse)
Those responsible for this mess are the gun manufacturers, gun dealers,p their lobbyists and lawyers, the legislators they purchase, the nra-their bullhorn, the "little people" who believe their propaganda, the ones who are addicted to violence. |
Response to Rose Siding (Original post)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:09 PM
flamingdem (38,861 posts)
3. "Now they are transformed in a quasi-militant wing of the Republican party"
Wow, go Harry!
|
Response to Rose Siding (Original post)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 02:15 PM
question everything (45,040 posts)
4. What I don't understand is about police officers
and, do they have a lobby?
I would think that most police officers are against the easy availability of assault weapons. Also, I think that in general police officers tend to the conservative side. Yes, I know, two assumptions. Thus, why don't they press Republican members of congress to reinstate Feinstein's ban on assault weapons? The one from the 90s that for only 10 years and expired during the Cheney administration? |
Response to question everything (Reply #4)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 08:12 PM
houston16revival (953 posts)
5. Perhaps
because the status quo is good for business?
Budgets grow every year. Need more manpower, more armor, more training, more consultants, more drills, more strategic planning. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ |