Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,872 posts)
Mon May 21, 2012, 12:56 PM May 2012

Supreme court rules for government on immigrants' residence

Source: Reuters

By James Vicini

WASHINGTON | Mon May 21, 2012 11:20am EDT

(Reuters) - The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the length of lawful residence in the United States by immigrant parents cannot be considered by the federal government in deciding whether their children should be deported.

The justices unanimously handed a victory to the Obama administration and overturned a ruling by a U.S. appeals court that immigrants who entered the United States as children may count their parents' years in this country to satisfy the residency requirements.

Under federal immigration law, people who have been lawful permanent residents in the United States for at least five years and have lived continuously in the country for seven years can seek leniency from the government when facing deportation.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/21/us-usa-court-immigration-idUSBRE84K0T920120521

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
1. So, the parents can come here legally to work, but the kids have to stay at home?
Mon May 21, 2012, 02:33 PM
May 2012

Sounds a bit unfair to me. The parents are here paying taxes that support schools, the government etc. but their children can not benefit from this.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
6. No--the kids do not have to stay home. But when the kids commit crimes, and removal proceedings
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:26 PM
May 2012

begin, they do not get a stay based on the status/time of their PARENTS.



 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
5. Note it's the second opinion today that relies heavily on Chevron deference?
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:15 PM
May 2012

You have Kagan and Ginsburg, taking the 9th and 3rd to task, respectively, and calling for judicial restraint.

Something's coming.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
7. Why should criminals get a pass based on their parents' time in this country?
Mon May 21, 2012, 07:31 PM
May 2012

This applies to adult criminals who are in removal proceedings post-conviction. Why should their parents' time in this country impute to them?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme court rules for g...