Poll of African-American voters gives Rahm 10-point lead over Garcia
Source: Chicago Sun-Times
The poll of 1,003 registered voters, conducted for the Chicago Defender and WVON radio, has Emanuel at 46 percent and Jesus Chuy Garcia at 36 percent, with 18 percent undecided.
Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted March 25-26, with a mix of about 60 percent landline phones and 40 percent mobile phones. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.2 percentage points.
Read more: http://chicago.suntimes.com/chicago-politics/7/71/488681/poll-shows-rahm-10-point-lead-garcia
Yesterday, I was told that the Chicago Tribune couldn't be trusted and that thepoll was intentionally skewed. Can't wait to hear the excuse for today.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)But this denying reality just makes people look stupid.
I wonder if people will claim these are third way Dlc one percenters
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)And whites and just about all demos.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Rahm's huge lead comes from his 3-1 advantage among white voters.
donnasgirl
(656 posts)I believe Sir Rahmington will lose this election, this is the third article I have read this week. At least I hope so
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I might be persuaded if the Chicago Sun Times Poll:
http://chicago.suntimes.com/chicago-politics/7/71/478986/mayoral-runoff-results-little-changed
and the Chicago Defender WVON radio poll didn't show Rahm ahead among all voters and among a crucial demographic:
http://www.wvon.com/wvon-chicago-defender-2015-mayoral-poll-results
donnasgirl
(656 posts)But David Schaffer is saying that the challengers internal polling is showing a Garcia win but anything can happen in Politics I guess.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I don't have a dog in this fight as I have extraordinary limited knowledge of Chicago politics... I can only go by what I observe and my observation suggests Rahm is going to beat Chuy.
donnasgirl
(656 posts)I hope your wrong. LOL
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)"Well if i can hope I hope all the published polls are wrong and very wrong."
donnasgirl
(656 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)in DU's echo chamber.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)They probably think everything is just good...
Because they are too busy drooling, slack-jawed, while playing games or texting.
JI7
(89,244 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I sure can't ...That's why I am refraining from commenting on the choices.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Thread Title:
DUer response:
Because they are too busy drooling, slack-jawed, while playing games or texting.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that's just the way it came out.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I suspect he isn't a bigot, however I strongly believe he quickly saw the title, saw that real people disagree with him and the DU echo chamber, and consequently they must be stupid...
This site is very much an echo chamber as its nutty internet counterpart on the right.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)The age demographics
are the most interesting.
Chuy gets more young votes
and the undecided tend to be young.
But notice also, the poll uses
"Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews"
the least reliable of polls.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If the sample is too small, ergo:
Yawn ;~( 10 points from 1000 people pfft)
-Cosmic Kitten
Why are you even making inferences from them:
The age demographics
are the most interesting.
Chuy gets more young votes
and the undecided tend to be young.
But notice also, the poll uses
"Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews"
the least reliable of polls.
-Cosmic Kitten
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)A poll of a tiny demographic
isn't a valid gauge of
a huge population.
However, of those who
did respond the age
cross tabs are interesting.
No inference,
just an observation
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)And then you further divided the sample the sample you suggested wasn't robust enough thus making it more useless...
All I know is the evidence suggests Rahm is going to beat Chuy and beat him by a comfortable margin and the evidence is becoming cumulative.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)What was the inference?
former9thward
(31,970 posts)And that was when there were AA candidates in the race. No surprise at his lead now.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)If this election can be stolen from Garcia, it will be. Money don't like to lose.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)underestimating the intelligence of the American public." H.L Mencken
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Interesting read on the
Chicago Tribune.
I'm interested in the poll
results from the previous
Chicago elections cited.
Back to the right-wing Tribune for a minute. The brass there have a well-known and well-documented bias against progressive candidates. Its history of so-called "independent polling" reflects that regressive Republican bias. Whether it was the insurgent mayoral campaign of Jane Byrne in 1979 or the revolutionary mayoral victory of Harold Washington over the Chicago machine in 1983 or Pat Quinn's remarkable win over Bill Brady in the face of a Republican tide in the 2010 gubernatorial race-- the Tribune poll never had ANY of these candidates in the lead, EVER!
Each of them-- Jane Byrne, Harold Washington and Pat Quinn, a woman, an African-American, and a progressive independent, respectively-- were, at this point in their respective campaigns, between 20 and 30 points behind their Tribune-backed and endorsed opponent.
That's the pattern-- try to smother the progressive candidate with negative "polls." That's the playbook of the Radical Right. Hide the truth.
brooklynite
(94,490 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chicago_Defender
Now, when Emanuel wins on Tuesday, as EVERY poll has indicated he will, that'll mean the voting was rigged as well as all the polls, right?