Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 05:00 PM Mar 2015

Satellite Explodes After 'Catastrophic Event'

Source: Sky News

A Navy satellite used to provide real-time weather reports has exploded in space.

The US Air Force confirmed that the 20-year-old Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Flight 13 (DMSP-F13) suffered a "catastrophic event".

It shattered into 43 pieces following a sudden temperature spike which triggered the loss of its altitude control.

The event happened on 3 February but the incident has only just came to light following questions from website Space News.

<snip>

Read more: http://news.sky.com/story/1436965/satellite-explodes-after-catastrophic-event

61 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Satellite Explodes After 'Catastrophic Event' (Original Post) bananas Mar 2015 OP
Meteor strike? OnlinePoker Mar 2015 #1
There's lots of space junk out there. More likely it hit the junk. sakabatou Mar 2015 #2
A picture speaks a thousand words mrdmk Mar 2015 #5
Someone should design a large flying magnet Flying Squirrel Mar 2015 #11
I'll call the Vogons... IthinkThereforeIAM Mar 2015 #45
That is not to scale. The satellites should be utterly invisible in that pic. nt Lucky Luciano Mar 2015 #18
If something hits something else.......... nolabels Mar 2015 #35
Wow! Delphinus Mar 2015 #56
Well, now there's 43 more pieces of junk out there. n/t OnlinePoker Mar 2015 #7
I wonder how they could count all the pieces? Art_from_Ark Mar 2015 #28
NORAD has a division specifically tasked with tracking debris over a certain size. DRoseDARs Mar 2015 #38
I was thinking christx30 Mar 2015 #6
And the skeptic in me wants to say: forest444 Mar 2015 #23
Our funding of Israel has lent a new meaning to davidpdx Mar 2015 #50
Temperature spike rules out didact Mar 2015 #58
Um... a Kessler syndrome in the making? El Supremo Mar 2015 #3
"Gravity"? Hestia Mar 2015 #10
Is that how Saturn got it's ring? Binkie The Clown Mar 2015 #24
Where's Wall-E when we need him? Nihil Mar 2015 #57
Borg? Sancho Mar 2015 #4
Putin. DocMac Mar 2015 #8
I'm also going with Putin 7962 Mar 2015 #9
hmmmm angrychair Mar 2015 #12
Like, duh. Obviously. closeupready Mar 2015 #16
So the crappy rechargeable batteries we paid for blew up. Big shocker. n/t jtuck004 Mar 2015 #13
Huh. Another example of "We don't need to tell anyone" elias49 Mar 2015 #14
"Real-time weather reports" for the Navy..yes...that is what it did..just that; or The Weather Channel? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #15
It's raining missles Renew Deal Mar 2015 #17
Mmm. You're not suggesting that this satellite was something else? erronis Mar 2015 #19
Going out on a limb here, VWolf Mar 2015 #20
Yes - original report, written by someone who knows satellites, here: muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #25
You know your stuff (nt) PosterChild Mar 2015 #40
Well, you really can't control altitude VWolf Mar 2015 #41
Yep.. PosterChild Mar 2015 #44
If one has sail area in a wind and you want to stay pointed at something Thor_MN Mar 2015 #49
Sounds like a Photon Torpedo to me. bvar22 Mar 2015 #21
*See below. DeSwiss Mar 2015 #31
Khan? itsrobert Mar 2015 #22
> ------------ @ Alkene Mar 2015 #26
^^^^^^^^^WINNER Blue_Tires Mar 2015 #34
The temperature spike is curious Android3.14 Mar 2015 #27
Or bearings seizing on a gyro, or malfunction of a thruster. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #47
Yours sounds better than my hypothesis Android3.14 Mar 2015 #52
Very good question. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #53
Gyroscope siezes up --> possible flywheel explosion ? eppur_se_muova Mar 2015 #61
HIllary shot it down....... Cryptoad Mar 2015 #29
The cause has been found! DeSwiss Mar 2015 #30
If it had been Klingons there would have been toilet paper left behind davidpdx Mar 2015 #51
43 pieces? Earth_First Mar 2015 #32
More specific than counting returns on a RADAR system? Thor_MN Mar 2015 #48
Paraphrasing Lenny Bruce, If the Jews didn't do it, it must have been the Puerto Ricans. Hoppy Mar 2015 #33
Obviously destroyed by space-aliens nikto Mar 2015 #36
Okay DU Submariner Mar 2015 #37
It was likely attacked. zappaman Mar 2015 #39
Could be a tin whiskers short Zorro Mar 2015 #42
I'm not saying that it was aliens..... Nye Bevan Mar 2015 #43
Space Junk... GReedDiamond Mar 2015 #46
The Teamsters did it seveneyes Mar 2015 #54
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #55
Must have used cheap Chinese parts. roamer65 Mar 2015 #59
Death Star father founding Mar 2015 #60

mrdmk

(2,943 posts)
5. A picture speaks a thousand words
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 05:21 PM
Mar 2015


It is a major problem! Even more of a problem if somebody needed to clean it up...
 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
38. NORAD has a division specifically tasked with tracking debris over a certain size.
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 09:24 PM
Mar 2015

This, in order to better protect both functioning satellites, prevent or at least predict collisions, and most importantly protect Human lives in-orbit.

Edit: Seems other agencies, both US and foreign, are doing this. The more, the better.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
6. I was thinking
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 05:22 PM
Mar 2015

some kind of ground based anti-satellite weapon. The OP did mention a sudden temp spike. The scifi fan in me wants to say a laser

forest444

(5,902 posts)
23. And the skeptic in me wants to say:
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 06:38 PM
Mar 2015

Last edited Mon Mar 2, 2015, 10:09 PM - Edit history (1)

Spy satellite, probably directed against one of our major adversaries.

Or perhaps even Israel - which under Netanyahoo's tutelage is quickly becoming a major adversary. The problem, of course, is that Israel was almost the same counterintelligence capabilities we do, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer. Given the timing and considering Bibi's attitude, I certainly wouldn't put it past Israel to have zapped this satellite.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
50. Our funding of Israel has lent a new meaning to
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 06:29 AM
Mar 2015

We created a monster.

I think you are right and we are going to regret having funded so much of their military capability.

didact

(246 posts)
58. Temperature spike rules out
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 09:59 AM
Mar 2015

orbital debris or meteor IMO, old DMSP satellite - I'm thinking we used it as a targeting drone.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
24. Is that how Saturn got it's ring?
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 06:39 PM
Mar 2015

Maybe Earth will end up with a glittering metallic ring system to rival Saturn's.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
9. I'm also going with Putin
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 05:35 PM
Mar 2015

since one of his paid trolls over on Discussionist always touts Russia's ability to bring them down

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
14. Huh. Another example of "We don't need to tell anyone"
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 06:01 PM
Mar 2015

What the Dept of Offense does is none of our biz?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
15. "Real-time weather reports" for the Navy..yes...that is what it did..just that; or The Weather Channel?
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 06:08 PM
Mar 2015

erronis

(15,219 posts)
19. Mmm. You're not suggesting that this satellite was something else?
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 06:14 PM
Mar 2015

Than yet another weather monitoring box? Actually, most of the stuff that is shot up into orbit has multiple roles - civilian and military. And yes, the US as well as other countries are looking for in-orbit measures to disable other satellites (or missiles).

VWolf

(3,944 posts)
41. Well, you really can't control altitude
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 10:06 PM
Mar 2015

Usually satellites don't have enough fuel on board to kick into another orbit. What they do have is a small amount of "station keeping" fuel, which is used to control attitude (orientation).

PosterChild

(1,307 posts)
44. Yep..
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 10:26 PM
Mar 2015

.... one amazing trick to conserve fuel (delta v) while maintaining attitude control is to use solar pressure on the solar panels by differentially adjusting them.

In fact the Kepler telescope has been kept operational after losing two reaction wheels using this technique. Completely mind boggling !

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
49. If one has sail area in a wind and you want to stay pointed at something
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 06:23 AM
Mar 2015

the options are to balance the sails or use energy to counteract the wind.

They traded peak solar power (all panels perpendicular to the sun) for not being blown around (angling the panels to balance solar wind).

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
27. The temperature spike is curious
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 07:12 PM
Mar 2015

It would seem to indicate it was not a collision or a kinetic weapon. Satellite killer perhaps (laser, fresnel lens or mirror, or smaller explosive device.

A collision seems unlikely.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
47. Or bearings seizing on a gyro, or malfunction of a thruster.
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 06:10 AM
Mar 2015

They reported that the temperature spike occurred after loss of attitude control, which implies an intended attitude change failed.

A temperature spike not related to a system change would indicate an outside event. If one makes a change in a system and an error occurs, it's highly likely the change caused the error.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
52. Yours sounds better than my hypothesis
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 07:18 AM
Mar 2015

Especially the gyro. But the breaking up into so many sizable pieces is curious. Is there enough fuel to cause that big of a break-up, I wonder.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
53. Very good question.
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 09:02 AM
Mar 2015

Although I don't know what is considered a sizable piece. I'd have to assume observation by RADAR as visual would require the sun, remains and observer to be in favorable positions as opposed to being over the horizon to any of the numerous tracking stations.. I wonder what is size limit for resolution of a object in orbit.

I'd think that any process that would create in excess of 40 pieces would either need to be on the violent side, scattering them rapidly, or be due to brittleness from cold possibly.

It is kind of hard to imagine a fuel/oxidizer explosion not simply rupturing the weakest spot then rocketing the intact remainder in the opposite direction.

eppur_se_muova

(36,257 posts)
61. Gyroscope siezes up --> possible flywheel explosion ?
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 12:13 PM
Mar 2015
Tensile strength and failure modes

One of the primary limits to flywheel design is the tensile strength of the material used for the rotor. Generally speaking, the stronger the disc, the faster it may be spun, and the more energy the system can store.

When the tensile strength of a composite flywheel's outer binding cover is exceeded, the binding cover will fracture, followed by the wheel shattering as the outer wheel compression is lost around the entire circumference, releasing all of its stored energy at once; this is commonly referred to as "flywheel explosion" since wheel fragments can reach kinetic energy comparable to that of a bullet. Composite materials that are wound and glued in layers tend to disintegrate quickly, first into small-diameter filaments that entangle and slow each other, and then into red-hot powder, instead of large chunks of high-velocity shrapnel as can occur with a cast metal flywheel.

For a cast metal flywheel, the failure limit is the binding strength of the grain boundaries of the polycrystalline molded metal. Aluminum in particular suffers from fatigue and can develop microfractures due to repeated low-energy stretching. Angular forces may cause portions of a metal flywheel to bend outward and begin dragging on the outer containment vessel, or to separate completely and bounce randomly around the interior. The rest of the flywheel is now severely unbalanced, which may lead to rapid bearing failure from vibration, and sudden shock fracturing of large segments of the flywheel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage#Tensile_strength_and_failure_modes

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
32. 43 pieces?
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 07:25 PM
Mar 2015

Seems like an awfully specific number to know for certain...

Sorry nothing to add to the commentary -that number as definitive just stands out as odd in my opinion.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
48. More specific than counting returns on a RADAR system?
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 06:16 AM
Mar 2015


Take something, break it, count the pieces... The actual number is probably higher as there's bound to be some pieces too small to track.
 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
36. Obviously destroyed by space-aliens
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 08:12 PM
Mar 2015

"The perfect organism, unclouded by conscience or delusions of morality"...etc etc


zappaman

(20,606 posts)
39. It was likely attacked.
Mon Mar 2, 2015, 09:43 PM
Mar 2015

By the same aliens who have been creating crop circles and kidnapping humans just to put things in their butts.

Response to bananas (Original post)

 

father founding

(619 posts)
60. Death Star
Tue Mar 3, 2015, 11:40 AM
Mar 2015

Was it emitting the high frequency radio waves that are causing the exploding glass phenomenon ?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Satellite Explodes After ...